Space Merchant

@JW InsiderYep, and that is just a couple of things he worked on concerning Pastor Russell, outside of hit YouTube crusades he tends to deal with should someone go too far. The last time I saw him he was dealing with someone who was justifying that the Lord mentioned in Jesus in Acts 2:21, and Romans 10:13, even Joel 2:32 is Jesus, even going as far as to use a Lexicon to prove it, and Reslite made a response to the person. There was someone else similar to him, who may be a JW who also speaks of the pastor, but is more neutral.

@Srecko Sostar Seems as though you need to read up more on what is constitutional and or anything similar to it, as is with data tracking within an AD or anything similar to that effect. within said fields.

There was a lot that took place in Russia around the time the JWs got banned prior, during and after. Essentially, it is like that of someone lighting a match to a flame. So a lot of things took place, cooled down slightly after Putin won..... (by a landslide.) then you have the events of Alexei Navalny and his allies, Homosexuals disappearing off the streets and sent to camps, and the emergence of the FSB and hacker groups using FindFace to track not only Alexei Navalny allies, but falsely brand anyone associated with him, including Religious people. Moreover, it has nothing to do with politics, but the claim of them being extremist more of a push to remove them even, in addition, to many things mentioned by Kremlin controlled media. It was technically a Triad in Russia that ultimately caused these things.

This alone shows the unawareness of what is constitutional and what is not. Even those in Law can make a mistake in anything related to and or equal to things in the realm of Constitutional like restrictions. Actually when it comes to all religious institutions under such a thing, they're identical, it only becomes complex the bigger and more sensitive the data is in institutions that have very little to do with religion, as is, vs the individual who seeks said data of where they are position, i.e. a common working man vs a doctor, police officer, someone in government, FBI seeking data from someone's phone, device, etc. That being said, critical and sensitive data can't really be requested by someone to a degree, i.e. an Ex-Employee (out of the company for 6 years) cannot ask for his data on the active directory and or anything pertaining to it on the server, it is held by said cooperate business.

I found some of Reslite's work, regarding his defense of 1914, he has a lot to say about it, as well as defending Pastor Russell from ExJWs sources. The first quotation below was his response to an EXJW blog post which is connected to JW Facts. The second quotation is a bit lengthy, for his focus was people taking things out of context in relation to 1914

They can still hold records even if you are no longer in their faith community, you may have said or done something that resulted in grounds of excommunication if they had you listed as such, also depends on those involved. Granted this is private data, it is still stored by them. Due to under such constitutional like arrangement. This is the same with all institutions, mainly businesses, even schools, for anyone removed from said institutions, their record is still there. In IT you cannot delete a former employee's record, be it if they left on their own accord or they are disgruntled against an institution and got themselves terminated. Religious institutions hold records for the main reason of keeping excommunicated folks out of their community if they pose a problem. Records most of them usually hold is equal to that of a school record to some degree, person's name, address, birth date, age, sex, etc, even email and with it various notes and or accolades, if so and so got injury at some point, etc. Usually the bigger and higher the institution, the more complex these records get, and the more sensitive they are. Even more complex if the institution in of itself has the legitimate data in it's heart, so to speak, meaning if the heart is compromised, with even a small KB of someone's data being leaked or given out, outside of what is deemed constitutional, the institution can be essentially brought to ruin and or damaged badly. Moreover, even those in Law sometimes do not realize they are fighting against or going around the constitution itself and or anything similar to it, i.e. the events of January 6th in the United States whereas Leftism attempt to break constitution to enact an end game.

BSB is literal word for word/easy to read, there isn't a study source for it, granted it was produced by Bible Hub, however, Bible Hub instill takes in commentary and notes from others such as Thayer, etc. However, the notes are mixed, therefore, you would still need to study outside of Bible Hub for better understanding. The BSB and the NWT are among the few Bibles that is said to follow the sources, whereas BSB is literal word for word easy read format and the NWT is a modern revision, more evident to them following the earliest source can be seen in verses like 1 Timothy 3:16, Acts 7:59, Revelation 1:11, etc. That being said, as long as there is no affiliation with TR and if there is, there has to be a notation. This is one of my issues with KJV Onlyist, even during a time I use to deal with them in person.

The verse still applies to people today, be it chosen or not, JB, as with those before us.

To be fair LORD in all caps refers to the God of Israel - Strong's 3068. In some translations it is Yahweh or Jehovah/YHWH. It is only a violation if something other than the Strong's itself is there and or something not related to it. The only people who get fooled are those who do not know why LORD is all caps or it's connection to Tetragrammaton. But to be honest, if the people back then simply put YHWH or equivalent and left it as is, a lot less confusion by others later on, then you also have the fear of those who invoke the name of God.

But you are an individual. Works differently with institutions and or cooperate, and or those within, etc. There are records that are specific of which you as an individual cannot obtain in the United Kingdom. Therefore, some data you won't be able to obtain, mainly sensitive critical data, i.e. they won't give you the history of and or medical records of child A, B and C to you directly, but they will give it to someone who is of a higher authority or position in that Children's Home because they are the ones manage these records, and keep it private, even in the respects of that child's guardian. This goes for other forums of data, even in the realm of media. Likewise with any Data in connection to you, in the wrong hands if given out can destroy your life and the live of those in the crossfire. That being said, when it comes to Data, passing of Data, it can prove to be useful or destructive leaving some type of scar regardless of which direction it takes.

I made this point, they are not unified, there are different groups who are independent, different views, even those who hold 1914, or that similar to it, to some significance be it Jesus being crowned as King or the latter. The CSE thread brought up the 1843 chart because the question was asked if anyone outside of JWs hold this 1914 view, identical or similar, and the groups were brought up, some who held the view, others who may have shared the view or had something different, reasons why those 2 groups were mentioned because they were listed. JWI added others of which not related to any of the mentioned Bible Student groups, for it was always assumed others outside of JWs and Bible students viewed 1914 in some light, but not many can bring forth the name of said groups. Also true, Reslite is the type to constantly profess that he, along with those on his side to be compared to the original Bible Student group. There are other Bible Students who profess the same thing in regards to comparisons to the original, but on the other side of the spectrum, some do not, even to the point they do not wish to be called Russellites because they see it as Sectarian to a degree. The pastor was indeed different, some would say even unique. Then you have the constant conspiracy people profess about him, hence some of the students, even JWs enact a defense to misinformation.

Because it is. In that discussion you continuously professed a conspiracy theory as a truth, in that discussion, it was your 3rd attempt in doing so despite the fact your conspiracy was proven to be false. I even told you in that same discussion, why continue to speak of the UN when you had no idea how they operate and you simply said you do not wish to know. But we see that you continued with the conspiracy soon afterwards. Again, conspiracy theories at a level similar to Qanon, and their equals, cannot be assumed as truth. That verse can be used against you here, not the smartest quotation in regards to the United Nations. That being said, I have many issues with the UN already, and this is concerning Jaysh Al-Islam, which the United States and their allies had connections to, and a list of things. So being able to see a conspiracy such as in regards to a DPI Status, can easily be seen. Likewise with gun collector JW bunkers. Once again be careful with conspiracy theories. Exodus 23:1 - You shall not spread a false report. You shall not join hands with a wicked man to be a emalicious witness. Numbers 32:23 - But if you will not do so, behold, you have sinned against the LORD, and be sure your sin will find you out. Proverbs 19:5 - A false witness will not go unpunished, and he who breathes out lies will not escape.

People can still sin against the holy spirit, chosen or not. Jesus gave this warning to those under opposition, for he said that one who sinned against the Holy Spirit would not be forgiven in the current day and or things to come. A person whom God judged as having sinned against the spirit in would therefore not be in the book of life, no hope for a resurrection, since his sins would never be forgiven. This is why the best option is to be neutral with some mainly due to the fact of root origin from then to now. That being said, it is a line between forgivable sin and unforgiveable sin, and not being placed in front of the white throne in regards to judgement.

Again, names have reasoning, do not disrespect it by saying a fake name, for if you do not like it, do not speak of it at all. You are mistaken. You told me directly you had no platform, merely called you out for it, for if it was this of a serious case to you, then you would have shut down the JW teenager who called you Frida several times in the past, even pointing out where he found you, even much later on that same teenager asked you about platforms, yet here your tunes has changed willfully. I had since stopped talking about platforms, you were the one who continued to bring it up after being exposed. That being said, in regards to such, if one can be vocal about something, on for instance, Facebook, they can use said platform to educate people on child abuse, and I do not see why the effort isn't made by those who speak of child abuse repetitively. Granted, you brought up awareness in regards to the IICSA. There is nothing to debate about concerning Child Abuse via Sex and or Violence. These aren't my level of standards, this is in relation to CSA prevention. The information you provided have guidelines to such things, so as I told you before, the source itself is from CSA prevention, perhaps you should apply what you are proclaiming The link provided, which you probably didn't look into, gives numerous guidelines on how to play your part in Child Sex Abuse aside from their investigations. - https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports-recommendations/publications/investigation/cp-religious-organisations-settings Surely if you took it seriously, you'd express more on said guidelines on protective measures regarding child sex abuse instead of deviating. As you can see the IICSA used the Twitter Platform, not only to show awareness, but offer a link to said information of various things regarding child abuse in the United Kingdom, and they are one of several groups, this excludes community efforts. Actually you posted a link for the IICSA, it isn't JW focused only, but The United Kingdom itself. Look at your own link. I had made known evidence to this in the past, therefore confirmed. even those who were looking for the CSA information I posted here, of which they converted into Spanish because, even in the Latino community, this is problematic. I do not praise myself nor do I glorify others. I mention because you didn't know as to why I have the name I have now. Do not jumble yourself. That being said, I encourage you to look at the guidelines of IICSA instead of simply reading a Twitter heading. You can start with the below concerning Religions in England/Wales: https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports-recommendations/publications/investigation/cp-religious-organisations-settings/part-introduction/a2-religion-england-and-wales 8.1 in the introductory references the faith in question.

This is Totalitarian Authoritarianism. We knew it was going to happen, likewise with the situation in France, Canada and Germany. Under Authoritarianism, expect people to become opportunists and enact crimes. Knowing with what I learned about what is going down a few days ago, things are going to get bad.

They're not lies, nor do I twist things, granted me knowing how the enemy operates, that is, the UN, of which you do not know because you made the claim you do not wish to know; being unaware of a lion that is in the weeds. If they were indeed lies, then it would not have stopped you from showing a UN Charter and or Resolution written and or made like all DPI/NGOs. If I recall, you were not able to provide anything the last 2 times it was discussed: As I told you before, a DPI status only with no Resolution and or Charter isn't part of the UN. There are steps and approvals. Therefore, you professed a lie in regards to the United Nations and it's inner workings. You also had no idea what ECOSOC was. You never dealt with anything UN related, therefore, you using a conspiracy to justify a truth is, in of itself, a lie, therefore, my hatred for the UN does not even enable me to twist things, let alone culture, as mentioned to you before. That being said, best to stay your blade regarding the United Nations because all it will take is one quote. For someone who is Christian to ignore something hidden in the weeds and tall grass, only makes you a target, like all MSCs, such as yourself.

I believe this was addressed in another forums. I didn't use the wiki. More so, there are a few connections that I know of who are Bible Students, mainly the neutral ones like Reslite. That being said, those 2 Bible groups of which you quoted from my command, are still existing, but have minor activity, some of their members, although not organized, are lone Bible Students - Hence my remarks. EDIT: Just realized I made a response to you already. As for Wiki, it is a mixed bag of apples in of itself. Some information true, others not. What people do not may attention to is the citations. Other then that, it is best to look for the actual source instead of a wiki. This may be unknown to you, but wiki has been manipulating information for the past several months now.

Yep, and I had sent this before. Around that time there was another person who spoke about 1914, but had his own blog post who went by the name Reslite. Reslite is most likely still a Bible Student, and stated to have studied Pastor Russell for many years. He at times, blames JWs for things, but often finds himself defending Russell from ExJWs. Ironically enough if you catch him at a good time, he is willing to speak to anyone regardless of their faith. As with the mention Reslite, who he himself talked about 1914. So far, it isn't always easy to find his information, he might know something, probably some info on the Canadian Minister. The below is one of his comments, but similar.

Seems you cannot bear of what is being asked of you. Did you bother to check the cases, or the exhibits? No? Not yet still? Why? I mean, if you posted that video but can't bring what was mentioned in a response to said video, clearly something is being ignored. The information you put is technically the introductory to Jehovah's Witnesses on ARC. Surely you can do better than that. I linked you ARC for a reason, if I had asked you for an introductory, I would have asked. So I wait until to speak on what was asked of you pervious concerning Child Abuse among Jehovah's Witnesses from a couple years back. That being said, IICSA has an interest P.O.I, as mentioned. This is why I mentioned Status. Concerning CSA people of Status are not really pressed on.

Exactly, and I deal with this person to call her bluff. To this day, I haven't seen a JW church with weapon bunkers in their basement. I haven't seen a charter/registration singing regarding the UN. I haven't see any Bible Information on churches existing in Ancient Israel, let alone a leader of the opposite sex who holds religious office. Even when you correct such one, they go around with something else. When you give a question, they do not answer it, and go around it, and when you tell them the truth, such one quickly turns into a feminist and calls you by assumption misogynistic for quoting Paul, and not putting a capital "W" for women. Sometimes you wonder how lost such one is. So in that regards, I call them out on the misinformation and conspiracy. That being said, you won't get an direct answer for a very long time, and the latter prays that people do not remember what you said to them.

Whether you use your real name or not, people can find you via IP and or otherwise. Your picture can also be used by others and or ads, even the degusting ones, granted some people's pictures were used, adults and children for nefarious things, I've already mentioned the Dark Web. You can only sort of escape that with your security is good. Regardless, if you have the ability to log in and make a comment, like/dislike something, you are tied to a platform via device, email, IP, etc. You can't post here, in this specific thread as a guest. That isn't out forums work and Admin made that clear, although I mentioned him, I didn't quote him. I don't know if you are saying something that is concise, or you stumbled upon your words and lost all sense. What does the Internet have to do with parallel universes and "3rd space-time reality"? You aren't making a whole lot of sense, perhaps to avoid talking about the cases in ARC. Understandable because you clearly take CSA seriously, as always on this forum, this is why I pointed out if you knew Red Flags but you did not, so you wouldn't be good at detecting abuse. Such is strange to a man who shows ignorance and dances in his own folly. On the contrary, all names and pictures have a meaning behind it, you were told this, Butler was told this, but I guess the strawberry cake that is placed at the Tableau des anges déchus is too good for the both of you. The name "Space Merchant" with a "Storm Trooper" picture has a reasoning by behind it, as I always allauded to it, even mentioned it briefly. Marchand de l'espace (Space Merchant) derives from short stories of my mother when she was in her country, Haiti. She was a fan of super heroes as a child, and she created a name for herself, Space Merchant, which she made from a mix from her interest in The Green Lantern and Space Ghost since that and JSA was usually aired in Haiti to those who had access to a Television, created her own hero name. She did this in order to not think about the badness, the killings, even threats of practitioners of Black Magic (Voudou) to her and others; this mentality helped her to stay sane because being in constant fear can take toll on people, thus assuming herself to be like that of a hero of some kind, and she, even as a child back then, helped people her age and, culturally older ones, while being pressed with all that stuff around her, as with her nearly losing her life a few times, granted, those of Black Magic often go for children and teenagers for their blood, that is why some are superstition and or do not give/take blood, the old generation and some of the new, onward today. So I take up that name, Space Merchant aside from what I am originally called BSGT_ Jean-Baptiste or simply Steph. I was even told it would be good to take up that name since I mentioned the story elsewhere. I referred to myself as Space Merchant prior to joining CSE whereas I was already an avid preacher of the gospel, as with being quite logical, and this earned me a lot in the debate space at CSE and in public. In the Truther community, although I am called SM there, people who are aware of me call me Space Merchant. I told Butler this already a while back in regards to this but was brief about it after he attempt to joke about why my name is such, mocked it even. The lost soul does not know when it comes to some people, even Islanders, there is a name behind everything and there is a reason as to why people choose or have such names, be it a title name, alias, etc. Unfortunately some folks in the United Kingdom are unaware of this or being hypocritical, granted their history. Like she did to help others, I do the same, hence why I have been involved with children, and helped out elsewhere. Storm Trooper picture derives from 2 things. A child who I knew who liked Star Wars, his parents were Star Wars fans themselves, to this day (however not open about it as much because they lost their son). The child was an only child (their only child) and because of his interest in Star Wars, he drew the characters from it a lot, and favored Storm Troopers, he even called me a Storm Trooper. Unfortunately, this child passed away despite being a few months away from the being age 11, and what took his life was an infection, the Flu, for young children are more at risk for the Flu. Although he sleeps in death, and God through Christ Jesus will raise him soon, every since then I maintain a Storm Trooper picture everywhere, and it seems it is suitable for my name, more so, it is a constant reminder for that child, this is the reason I am not the type to forget things and often bring them up; granted as people age, they lost their memory in some cases. The other part of that originated with the picture is the fact I was called a Biblical Storm Trooper. This was when I was debating a lot, so much so, I can recall most of my debates, even my early ones when I was a newbie in the debate space, this is also what led me to many things connected to other people, The Speaker's Corner in London, Kel, UK Truthers, The Restorationists, Ezekiel the Goldfish (Sunrise Ezekiel), Kathgar The Arabic JW who survived a terror attack, The late [who some alleged to have disappeared] Souja of God (anointed), FAKT Russia, Steven Gern, Venti, The Truther Community, as is with those who are Anti-Agenda (dislike for opposition groups), etc. The Bible knowledge came from my Father of course, as is principle, the very reason I call out falsehood, aside from being a Truther. Although not mentioned, The Islander part should be obvious, my culture derives from it, mainly due to the fact we were Scripture heavy. This also led to my growing in knowledge at a very young age, even baptized at the island. As I grew, I saw first hand what sin can do to a man, for I mentioned my brother who got himself addicted to pornography, as is with a late friend of mine, who was persuaded to do pornographic films and eventually she took her life after what the adult industry and the bullying that followed; this resulted in groups like Anonymous going after cyber bullies, including the one regarding my late friend. At least I am aware that there is a reasoning behind everything, even names. This is why I called you a pretender. St least now this time you learn; compared to the latter who knows who he is, and pretends he is not said person because he fears the admin when many people called him out. You can mock all you want the name and picture, but the fact there is reasoning behind such, the name even the picture itself, I hold true to those convictions, and that is why I am how I am, even I speak like I do in this manner to people, mainly when it comes to call their bluff, as I did to you, as is, I don't flinch to people, even former JWs on the dark side of the moon. Kind of hypocritical to attest to Child Abuse Awareness if this is how you act and response, for if the thread was in regards to such, you didn't have to do all that shoehorning. As I told @ApostaBabe Linda James the story of Sarah, I hope this time you remember her name (for the mugshot of the pedophile should have been recognizable to someone who us posting about CSA in the UK). Therefore, choose your next response carefully, for, if you can't talk about CSA to drive interest in conversation and or additional solutions, they you simply made this thread for no reason. That being said, as are my convictions, unlike you, I am very serious about CSA, so much so, I believe I was among the few who spoke about CSA on a grounded level form of discussion, a couple times actually.

Snoopers for what? He lied, and he was corrected. But it seems now you ignore the lie. That being said, it didn't stop you and the latter from doing the exact same thing, calling things of this nature out. And please, to insult one is a hit on many, do not insult the Truther Community, for them, even in the UK, they've been doing a lot concerning CSA, they knew the story of Sarah, and you, living there, being born there, I find it surprising you didn't know her story since you said it yourself, you are focusing on CSA in United Kingdom. Ironic how I know more of the UK's innerworkings, but you do not, likewise with the situation that IICSA had with Teresa May. I don't snoop, platform remark was a lie, simply called it out. @Srecko Sostar lied twice actually. A man of God you claim to be, but when one of your own lies, you see no reason to speak. Therefore, you proved my point. You said you used Facebook and YouTube, so that is not unknown to me or anyone else. None of you are doing anything about CSA in regards to helping child via platforms, and that can be seen. Likewise, you are among many who do not realize pedophiles access such platforms, some people stamp them out. Twitter is an interesting one because we found something in relation to your camp. Facebook is indeed a platform... If it is this useful as you claim, what is stopping you from discussing child sex and violence abuse on a grounded discussion? That gang you mentioned before who stop child abuse, they do this to an extent to, what is stopping you, or perhaps the JW teen was right about you and Srecko. But you shy away from discussion child abuse yet you whine about it here with no positive resolve. But you defended someone lying regarding platforms. How is that Christian? Cherry picking the trees, are you? That being said, this alone shows that the both of you are not serious at all when it comes to child sex abuse. You prove my point many, many times whenever CSA it brought up. Some of those gang bikers are Truthers as well, hence their connection to BACA. I will gladly see their reaction to how some people claim they are serious about CSA... Because this can be seen here.

Guests cannot comment in this club, you logged in using a email. It was not a poor choice of words. The fact you can leave a comment, in your name, with a profile, also proves hit as fact. And? you still have an account on this forums. Nice try tap dancing over that, and clearly it did not work. I do not care about OCD, I care about people stating misinformation as a truth, which you did. And yet you continue to avoid the case studies, the question is why? What you referenced is the opening, but you, like the guy in the video, avoid speaking about the case studies, the reason is already known. I already made comment to that regarding posting on official sites. Some JWs posted several links in this club in regards to discussion, even JWI had something to say. They have actually, ARC was talked about several times here by others, specifically @Anna and @JW Insider. In Anna's case, she checked you "hard" several times, and to this day you do not even realized you were corrected, similarly to how The Black Knight in the film Monty Python and the Holy Grail, who didn't realize how bad his injury is. That being said, I ask again, there was a specific note in the case studies I adhered to before you started to tap dance. Why ignore it? Also, among all faith institutions who had CSA issues and were in ARC, the JWs were pretty low. If I remember correctly, out of all institutions/clubs, the Catholic Church was the highest, mainly due to the fact they have a large presence in Australia.

Granted I am in IT, I can tell you some, not all, people purposely sound technical in the IT field to [A] show off to employers and vendors and or others and or [B] Make a client feel like they do not know anything. No one RTFM apparently, resulting in them getting into problems, mainly when dealing with specifics in servers. That is also true for some. People tend to quote a verse and or passage out of context and or without context, other times, they will sacrifice the context itself, be it from a verse and or passage to prove a point or a non core kidology or remark; not giving straight answers or pretending to not even read what you say, a tactics often used by MSCs and or Trinitarians. Your comment also reminds me, as of right now, a debate I am in with a Trinitarian Christian who claims the following: 1. Catholics came before Christians therefore all Bishops were Catholics. 2. Attempt to say Easter has no pagan origins 3. Justifying that Jesus is God by quoting a small passage from Thayer's Lexicon to prove Jesus is YHWH via Joel 2:32, Acts 7:59, 60, Acts 2:21 and Roman 10:9-13. All this because he is misusing Scripture and relying on a small note from Thayer and BDAG 3rd edition, and being snarky about it at the same time.

What is stopping you from going to ARC to even read it? It was said many times here, ARC's information is open to the public. Other then that, that is quite a baseless remark; with a bit of reaching, and for reason. That being said, you coined ARC, do yourself the favor and look into the findings themselves, the same ones that your video source has withheld from you. Other then that, cease the reaching. Here is the link for ARC - https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/ You can find Jehovah's Witnesses and all things pertaining to them from a 2 second search, not difficult as you make it out to be. I'm pretty sure every single JW who has access to the internet are found on multiple platforms. Also seeing your history elsewhere, you are not a grounded person, as it is true here as well. Sure. But you're no quest, you logged in with an email, from a device tied to an IP Address via ISP on an open forum. One thing for certain, this proves that birds do not provide you internet access hence our last discussion regarding that. I thought you said you do not have a platform? Yesterday you said you do not have such things, now here you revealed to hypocritical state you have access to YouTube (logged into via email, from a device, tied to an IP via ISP). You leave comments, yet, nothing grounded or impactful to encourage a neutral discussion and or conversation about sex abuse.... Therefore your remark from yesterday was not true, let alone what you told the teenager. Here we go again... Access to someone's blog, using an email from a device, tied to an IP via ISP.... Yesterday remark is starting not to age well.... A poor choice of words at best. It isn't about a freedom to profess elsewhere. You deliberately stated you only have this open forum as a platform.... Yet now you expose yourself without me saying anything. Even if you did counsel such things, you can easily be found out. The club isn't a platform, the forum is, hence the provider mentioned way at the bottom. Probably because you can talk about child sex abuse. In your other platforms, you post links and post things about awareness, mainly because of animals even advocate of aiding animals and the like, which I know because the teenager referred to you as Frida a few times, which confused me. But for some unknown reason you often speak about JWs from one sided sources, yet never used the opportunity to speak about child sex abuse from both sides of the spectrum or at a neutral setting. Clearly not. But I am not unwise to say having access to the internet, therefore only remaining on a single forum. I would not say something absurd to hide hypocrisy either. Devices and internet majority of the time 99.99% equates to access to other platforms, as long as you have an email (also derives from a platform, G+, Outlook, Yahoo, etc.) That being said, the Information Tech infrastructure is what I dwell on, so I can see through the farce, even yours. I only called you out, nothing more. Srecko, this is why I said you pretend not to know, I hate theories, mainly conspiracy theories, I am Anti-Agenda, and I have a total dislike for the Left and Right Paradigm. Truthers hate theories for the fact that is results in misinformation, even getting people killed, i.e. Serena Shim, Seth Rich, Beck going into hiding (washed) etc and what revolved around their deaths; and how the MSM spins things. The only reason you can easily be found out in regards to platforms because all someone has to do is look up "Srecko Sostar" and everything is shown, as with your remarks. I need not do anything because your own name puts you in the spotlight. Just google yourself, see what comes up, you are everywhere on many platforms. Conspiracy Theories found it's way into Child Sex Abuse and Missing Persons cases, and that in of itself is damaging, I see it all the time, mainly when pedophile is weaponized. More so, JWI may not see what I see, but pedophilia seen as normal to some is a problem, people seeking to normalize it exist and you see how much of a problem that would be, hence my issue with the New York Times' agenda, which Butler did not see. Other than that, continue to kid yourself because the JW teen said the same thing, if you have a platform, you can use it in this manner, in fact, I can quote him My friend, we aren't talking about Activism, or to make change. The issue of morality stems from Scripture even, for if there is a danger, counsel can be given in a discussion about the subject matter. It does not matter if someone is young or if someone is old - you are on a platform where child abuse is openly discussion even at random, it shouldn't stop you or anyone from providing insight. Perhaps now would be the best time to do so. Like I said, there was only one thread that was Bible heavy on the matter because of discussion, if that can be done, you can do the same, after all, you can create threads as someone on this forum, since you did nothing, you can do something now. Therefore, you can do something. Does not have to be anything major either. I say this because for some ExJWs they don’t really cover these things. That being said, the fact you didn't know the mugshot results question of how well you are aware of sex and violence abuse crimes done to children and teens in the UK. The story of Sarah was a major story which can be felt to this day; to make a thread about CSA in the UK, but not knowing this, shows that you aren't really into any discussion about child sex abuse, even the ones taking place in the JW churches.