Jump to content
The World News Media

JOHN BUTLER

Member
  • Posts

    1,653
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Witness in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    From @TrueTomHarley A personal letter to Billy the Kid. So why not in a personal folder 
    And I still find it funny how you compare yourself to GB / JW rules when you say you've been a 'bad boy'.  
    You go on about what the GB might have said and what the Elders said and how you 'justified yourself to men' (Elders), but no mention of Almighty God or Jesus Christ at all. 
    You keep saying this is not a congregation on here. Every sentence is about the JW Org.
    Tom please start thinking about GOD and JESUS CHRIST, not about pleasing men such as the GB and Elders. 
    One good thing about being outside of the Org is that it gives a person a closer relationship with God through Christ.  And you have just proved that through your own writings. 
  2. Haha
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to TrueTomHarley in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    You know, @BillyTheKid46, having written what I just did, there's a part of me that wants to take it all back. it is very hard to address a dozen different points of view expressed here at once and I think I overestimate my ability to rise to the occasion.
    It may be that everything is exactly as you say. At any rate, I'll keep mulling over the verses you have spotlighted.
     
  3. Haha
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to TrueTomHarley in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    Now now now. You threw this in as an afterthought and you should have left it out. Why not just say: “I am wise. Everyone else is stupid.”? It comes across as judgmental, Billy. And it serves no purpose. You have been at this for some time now, trying to make people behave on this worldly site as though they are in the Kingdom Hall. How’s that project going, anyway? If you choose to write on this forum, you must not write with only brothers in mind. You must write primarily for the non-Witnesses that might be lurking about. The brothers get their counsel at the Kingdom Hall.
    It cannot be done--converting the worldnewsmedia into a congregation. You only shoot yourself in the foot when you try and you leave a not-so-hot witness by saying things like the above. The internet is not the congregation and cannot be made to behave like one. From where did you receive the commission to declare: “Only 40 days more and the worldnewsmedia forum will be destroyed for its great badness”? You didn’t.
    It could be argued that you are the most hypocritical one here. I have made no bones about being a bad boy in certain respects. Were I obedient to all aspects of counsel, I would not be here. That is equally true of you, but you don’t acknowledge it. Do you think the GB says: “There are a lot of yo-yos on that ‘out there’ website, but thank God, we have our man Billy to straighten them out”? No. They say: “Oh, man, that TTH is a screwball and now that gunslinger Billy is also carrying on! How come they don’t listen to us and stay on better channels?”
    I am encouraged, Billy, and probably you are too, that ‘loyal’ ones seldom appear on this open club. If they come online, they stay in the closed club, which is spiritually more healthy. I like that. Don’t you? It shows an obedience on their part that neither you nor I display.
    I have explained to you more than once my reasons for disregarding counsel on internet association. You don’t accept it, but they are still my reasons. I am a brother neither servant nor elder, though I have served in those capacities previously. I am universally liked in my circuit because I am a peacemaker and I am not wound up too tight, though there are probably a few who think I am a windbag. What am I going to tell them—that I’m not? Recently two elders approached me to say they would like to use me more in the congregation, but was there anything to the rumor that I associate with apostates? I told them that there was not, however what I did came close enough that it might easily be taken that way, and if we apply the direction given young people to all adults, then it clearly was that way, so for that sake we all decided it better to leave things just as they are.
    I told them why I did what I did—that I learned a reporter who wrote several bad articles about us used a certain apostate Internet forum as his sole source. ‘If that’s the case, maybe others do as well. Maybe I can go there and plant some things that are more balanced,’ I told myself. I have put several long posts there, but afterwards I do not hang out. Each post produces a flurry of protests and I briefly answer a few, but after that I disappear. It is not a course that I recommend for others, and brothers usually get their heads handed to them on a platter when try, being severely outgunned and unprepared for the sheer onslaught that they trigger. It is being disobedient to counsel for me to do it, and I do not try to spin it otherwise. I would not presume to do it but for senior years, a long honed ability to write—if you do anything long enough, you tend to develop a knack for it—and enough humbling circumstances in life that I am not likely to become overly full of myself, much less go the way of these characters.
    The rules are different here, Billy. It is not the congregation. If you knocked on a householder’s door who was a known ne’er do well and when he answered you saw some brothers inside, you might say to them: “Um, guys, do you really think that you should be here?” But if they did not respond, what would you do? Would you feel it your place to barge into that householder’s home and make those brothers behave as they ought? It is kind of what you are doing here.
    We must respect our hostess here and abide by her rules--the Librarian, that old hen.
    Given that I have chosen to be online, I commit no wrong in whatever association I have with @JW Insider. He has committed an extraordinary indiscretion, in my opinion, and I have done my duty as a brother in exhorting, even rebuking him, in the way that is most effective for me—by a skit painting him as the friendly but incredibly naïve poker player who fans out his full house for all to see. That’s about all I can do but it is what a brother should do. It will all be lost on him, most likely, because he sings the "theocracy dies in darkness" mantra more fervently than Jeff Bezos. Do you think that he ought to be disfellowshipped? If so, note that he is not, or at least if he is we don’t know about it, and can therefore with good conscience treat him as in good standing. And why is that the case--that he is not or that we don't know? Because this is the internet, and the internet cannot be made to behave as the congregation. Persons ought not be here if they cannot get their heads around that.
     
  4. Haha
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to TrueTomHarley in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    This is the second time you’ve mentioned annointed in addressing me. I hope you don’t think that I claim to be annointed.
    You will know the day that I am annointed when you read a Going Out of Business sign in heaven.
  5. Upvote
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to Witness in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    In reference to scriptures used by Billy the Kid:
    1 Cor 1:10 – “no divisions among you”.  Paul was teaching the new anointed members of Christ’s Body, who were “sanctified in Christ” and “called to be his holy people”, to be one under Christ. No divisions were to occur in the Body of Christ. 
    Again, Watchtower’s take on the anointed ones today:
    "In addition, anointed Christians do not view themselves as being part of an elite club. They do not seek out others who claim to have the same calling, hoping to bond with them or endeavoring to form private groups for Bible study. (Gal. 1:15-17) Such efforts would cause divisions within the congregation and work against the holy spirit, which promotes peace and unity."  Wt/16/1 pp. 22-27
    Paul didn’t consider the anointed members bonding together as one body, an “elite club”.  He taught it was absolutely necessary for them to bond as one Body.  1 Cor 12:21-26
    Together, through successfully surviving all that Satan would throw at them, they would be the Bride of Christ; and together, they would know truth as long as they remained in Christ. Together, they would reign on the earth as "kings and priests".  Rev 5:9,10
    “As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain in him.”  1 John 2:27
     Who has the authority to divide Christ’s Body? 2 Cor 11:1-4   Who has the authority to transgress the Word of God and demand the Temple priests to remain separate from each other?
    The elder body has been given this blasphemous authority, under the direction of the GB.  Rev 13:4-6,11,12
    There is no scriptural validation for this, unless one has built his own "temple". In that case, he can authorize whatever he wants.  It will not be recognized by God, though, as worthy to receive His blessing.   Rom 1:25; Matt 7:21-23
    Eph 4:11-13 also applies to the anointed.  1 Cor 12:27-31; Eph 4:1-4
    There should be no division within the anointed body. Since it is obvious that there IS a determined division by decree of the GB, and what is promoted is unification of all members instead, there is no distinction made between what is holy and what is common; who comprise the holy priesthood and who do not.  There is no understanding of what God’s priesthood is assigned to do.  Lev 10:8-11; Ezek 22:26; Mal 2:7; 1 Pet 2:5,9  And, they have submitted themselves to this falsehood; they have allowed those who rule over them to keep them divided.  1 Cor 12:25  Division causes desolation to what should be a united people, a special possession of God.  1 Pet 2:9
    The Watchtower quotes from the October 2017 magazine that I gave early, state that “Jehovah’s spiritual temple” is the entire organization.  Within that idolatrous “temple” there is to be no division among its members. 
    Does God recognize it and bless it?
    ARE ALL JWS, NOW PRIESTS?
    ARE ALL JWS, CHRIST’S BRIDE?
    When the Man of Lawlessness is “set up” in God’s Temple, (2 Thess 2:4) it “exalts himself” above the Temple priesthood.  He ‘opposes’ the Temple of God,  by dissolving the defining element between the  holy and common. 
    2 Thess 2:4 – “set up”:  “sitteth” – “to set, appoint, to confer a kingdom on one, to fix one’s abode”, “to seat oneself”   
    It has been accomplished by the elder body "representing the royal priesthood".  
    JWs, the Temple of God in the anointed priesthood has been replaced by an idol – “Jehovah’s spiritual temple” called the Watchtower organization. 
    It is the accomplishment of “false christs” and a destructive “Beast”/organization/elder body.  Rev 13:1,11
    "For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect."  Matt 24:24
    Matt 24:15 - When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand)
    “the holy” - most holy thing, a saint
    “place” – “place, any portion or space marked off, as it were from surrounding space, an inhabited place, as a city, village, district”
    Addressing the saints:
      1 Cor 3:16,17 - Do you not know that you (the saints) are the temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwells (an inhabited place) in you?
    The only “holy place” Jesus recognizes is the Temple of God built on his Body.  If anyone can discern this, if anyone can visualize the desolation of God's Temple, they are to flee.  Matt 24:16
    Pearl Doxsey - "The Disgusting Thing", 4womaninthewilderness blogspot
  6. Like
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to Srecko Sostar in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    Nature is great. 
  7. Haha
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to TrueTomHarley in Showdown at the Chilean Corral   
    Yeah, it isn’t entirely clear, is it.
    Think Franz Kafka and you will have a better idea of where I am going with this.
    It isn’t for everyone, and there are no demerits for not going there. It is just as likely to be an utter waste of time if you do.
  8. Like
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to James Thomas Rook Jr. in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    Each one has to obey the dictates of his own individual conscience ....  that is what makes us,  US ... and not merely, only, and very, very sadly ..... just  animals.
    NOTHING MORE
     
  9. Like
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to Srecko Sostar in "STANDING WHERE IT DOES NOT BELONG"   
    Job 14:4 King James Version (KJV)
    4 Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one. .......perhaps only God can do this? Question is, would He using for such task; some of JW, some of Waking JW, some of ex-JW, some of Elders? .... and so on.
    Dear JW Insider, to set good example and shining - with good, proper, kind, truthful and loving deeds and words are necessary  in all and every thing in our life. But would that be enough, would that be possible in Environment of JW Society and their Culture how to deal with Different even Opposite?  
    Perhaps spirit of God can give such strength to some individual to Stay and to Survive in Such State, in such Organization. But...?!  Recall Elijah 1 Kings 19. Israel people want to kill him because of his shinning. Is it different in "Spiritual Israel" today? Some JW made suicide, some was cut off socially/spiritually from other JW by Elders Judicial Judgement and suffer. Not me, i not suffer, because i decided to left. I suffer in other ways :)) 
     
  10. Like
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Srecko Sostar in Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. IICSA   
    No. But I gave them enough details in one message that it should have got some sort of response. 
    They have my name and email address. They have the KH address. They have all the information I have. 
     
     
  11. Downvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from ASF-37 in Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. IICSA   
    From the email I received. " In June 2015 it issued a retention order covering documents of interest to the Inquiry to the leaders of 18 prominent religious organisations, including the Jehovah's Witnesses. " 
    18 different religions, apart from all the government departments and other institutions. So give them a chance.
    It doesn't say that the JW Org is not worth investigating does it ? It's just not top priority. 
    It is sad for the victims of JW Org sexual abuse here in the UK to have to wait longer, but I think the investigation will happen in time.
    As for me despising any religion well those are your words Tom not mine.  
  12. Upvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from James Thomas Rook Jr. in Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. IICSA   
    https://www.iicsa.org.uk/investigations
  13. Upvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from James Thomas Rook Jr. in Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. IICSA   
    No. But I gave them enough details in one message that it should have got some sort of response. 
    They have my name and email address. They have the KH address. They have all the information I have. 
     
     
  14. Like
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Srecko Sostar in Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. IICSA   
    From the email I received. " In June 2015 it issued a retention order covering documents of interest to the Inquiry to the leaders of 18 prominent religious organisations, including the Jehovah's Witnesses. " 
    18 different religions, apart from all the government departments and other institutions. So give them a chance.
    It doesn't say that the JW Org is not worth investigating does it ? It's just not top priority. 
    It is sad for the victims of JW Org sexual abuse here in the UK to have to wait longer, but I think the investigation will happen in time.
    As for me despising any religion well those are your words Tom not mine.  
  15. Downvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from ASF-37 in Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. IICSA   
    I was having a discussion on here somewhere with someone, concerning the IICSA investigation into JW Org in the UK. 
    I've just received this email from them so thought I'd put it up on here for people to look at. 
    It doesn't copy and paste exactly as it looks on my email, but here it is anyway :- 
    Our reference: IICSA-0013979

     
    Dear Mr Butler
    Thank you for contacting the Inquiry on 3 February.
    As you may be aware, the Inquiry is investigating institutional failure to protect children from sexual abuse in the Anglican and Roman Catholic Churches. In June 2015 it issued a retention order covering documents of interest to the Inquiry to the leaders of 18 prominent religious organisations, including the Jehovah's Witnesses.  
    The Inquiry has received correspondence from a considerable number of individuals raising concerns about child sexual abuse within Jehovah's Witnesses organisations. At present the Inquiry is committed to delivering its existing programme and is not currently launching any new investigations. However, as our work progresses, we will consider calls for a Jehovah's Witnesses specific investigation carefully.
    Any updates on our investigations, including scope and hearings can be found on our website at www.iicsa.org.uk/investigations
    Investigations The Inquiry has launched 13 investigations into a broad range of institutions identified on the basis of the Panel’s criteria for selection of investigations. The investigations will give a voice to victims and survivors of child sexual abuse, enable the Inquiry to understand how institutions have failed to protect children from sexual abuse and make practical recommendations to ensure better institutional protection for children in the future. www.iicsa.org.uk  
    I am sorry for the delay in responding to you and I hope that you have found this information useful. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this email, please do not hesitate to contact the Inquiry again.
    Yours sincerely

    Jodie Yarborough
    Head of Correspondence & Engagement Team
    Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse
     
  16. Upvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from James Thomas Rook Jr. in Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse. IICSA   
    I was having a discussion on here somewhere with someone, concerning the IICSA investigation into JW Org in the UK. 
    I've just received this email from them so thought I'd put it up on here for people to look at. 
    It doesn't copy and paste exactly as it looks on my email, but here it is anyway :- 
    Our reference: IICSA-0013979

     
    Dear Mr Butler
    Thank you for contacting the Inquiry on 3 February.
    As you may be aware, the Inquiry is investigating institutional failure to protect children from sexual abuse in the Anglican and Roman Catholic Churches. In June 2015 it issued a retention order covering documents of interest to the Inquiry to the leaders of 18 prominent religious organisations, including the Jehovah's Witnesses.  
    The Inquiry has received correspondence from a considerable number of individuals raising concerns about child sexual abuse within Jehovah's Witnesses organisations. At present the Inquiry is committed to delivering its existing programme and is not currently launching any new investigations. However, as our work progresses, we will consider calls for a Jehovah's Witnesses specific investigation carefully.
    Any updates on our investigations, including scope and hearings can be found on our website at www.iicsa.org.uk/investigations
    Investigations The Inquiry has launched 13 investigations into a broad range of institutions identified on the basis of the Panel’s criteria for selection of investigations. The investigations will give a voice to victims and survivors of child sexual abuse, enable the Inquiry to understand how institutions have failed to protect children from sexual abuse and make practical recommendations to ensure better institutional protection for children in the future. www.iicsa.org.uk  
    I am sorry for the delay in responding to you and I hope that you have found this information useful. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this email, please do not hesitate to contact the Inquiry again.
    Yours sincerely

    Jodie Yarborough
    Head of Correspondence & Engagement Team
    Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse
     
  17. Thanks
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to TrueTomHarley in Serena Williams confirms she will not celebrate daughter’s first birthday due to Jehovah’s Witness beliefs   
    Okay. Good answer.
    I thought that you might get sanctimonious about it, but you didn’t. 
    Following sport can be a religion in itself. It’s amazing the degree to which people get into it.
    It is even like when the Witness organization tries to sell everyone that kicking around the soccer ball at a picnic is the equivalent of being on the school sports team, and the kids roll their eyes because they don’t think it’s that way at all. In this regard, they should look to you.
  18. Haha
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to Shiwiii in Leah Remini Tackles Jehovah's Witnesses for 'Scientology and the Aftermath'   
    you keep bringing this up, but you know what? No one has mentioned it but you. Seems like you want a discussion on the topic. Do it. 
     
    This is straight up comedy.   Since you failed at expanding on the "mainstream Christianity" thing, you've had to resort to fourms and private clubs. Keep going sm, tell us about the knitting circle that won't allow cross stitch and how that ties back to your statement that Christians shun. 
  19. Upvote
    JOHN BUTLER reacted to James Thomas Rook Jr. in Leah Remini Tackles Jehovah's Witnesses for 'Scientology and the Aftermath'   
    TTH was in LlOYD's  HOUSE.
    The "homeowner" sets the rules about what speech is permitted.
    That is also true at the Kingdom Hall, and at my house.
    It is also true with The Librarian, and admin, here.
  20. Upvote
  21. Upvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Shiwiii in Was the Bible written and compiled for everyone to understand fully or only for a 'chosen few' to fully understand   
    Yes Anna but, did the Governing Body give themselves the name 'Faithful and discreet slave' and if so what gave them the right to do so ? 
    And then the GB said only they, those 8 men, are that 'slave', not all of the anointed. How can they judge this ? You are saying they are not inspired and there is no direct communication from 'above'. 
    Plus all the things I've spoken about previously, which erk some folks, seem to make it clear that the GB are not treating the congregants in a loving way. Remember 'By their works you will know them'. 
    It would have probably been easier for me to stay in the Org, keep my head down, and not to think, just obey.. That is how i see JW's acting. But is that what Jehovah and Jesus Christ really truly want people to be like ? Blind obedience ?
     
     
  22. Upvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Shiwiii in Was the Bible written and compiled for everyone to understand fully or only for a 'chosen few' to fully understand   
    I entirely agree with your last sentence and that is what I am hoping will happen very soon. 
    Remember that the scripture says at Luke 12 v 45 & 46. :-
    But if ever that slave should say in his heart, ‘My master delays coming,’n and starts to beat the male and female servants and to eat and drink and get drunk,o 46  the master of that slave will come on a day that he is not expecting him and at an hour that he does not know, and he will punish him with the greatest severity and assign him a part with the unfaithful ones.
    I am hoping that the GB will be removed from the JW Org and replaced by honest hearted ones. 
    But your illustration concerning Jesus and his disciples brings up other issues. In that case the people could easily see who Jesus was using to help him feed the crowd. It was clearly visible to the eyes. And the food was proven to be good food too.
    However, it is not so easy for anyone to see who is chosen to distribute the spiritual food at this time. And also to know if the food distributed actually is approved of by God or Jesus Christ. 
    Add to this that those who give themselves the title of 'Faithful and discreet slave' actually judge others of the anointed. And that the food they give is often withdrawn by them later, because it is not good food at all. It is proved to be poison. 
    'The important thing for "the domestics" is that the food is distributed'
    Is it ? Or is it that the food is truthful and correct and that it does actually come from the Master and not men's own thinking. 
  23. Downvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Foreigner in JW Canada: Judge authorizes class action for Jehovah's Witnesses sex abuse victims   
    No James, it is fake. Fake interpretation of scriptures. Fake F&DS. Fake love. Fake authority. 
    Even the number of JW's is now fake. Made up of five year olds, and fake baptisms. 
  24. Downvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Foreigner in JW Canada: Judge authorizes class action for Jehovah's Witnesses sex abuse victims   
    But if God wiped out the Nation of Israel or at least allowed it to be wiped out, because it didn't meet the mark, then do you think God wants another 'failure' of an organisation ? 
    (The Nation of israel didn't fail completely of course as it did its job of bringing forth God's son as a human, but it failed in its service to God)
    So, is God going to accept a fake organisation in which people are only interested in saving themselves ?  It's obvious there is not much love in there as it wouldn't be in such a mess. It's obvious that there is dishonesty and lack of understanding of the scriptures. It's obvious too that the Anointed are being mistreated by the GB, and i would say it's obvious that the GB have given themselves a false title of the F&DS. 
    Do you honestly believe that God is satisfied with the JW Org as it is ? 
  25. Downvote
    JOHN BUTLER got a reaction from Foreigner in JW Canada: Judge authorizes class action for Jehovah's Witnesses sex abuse victims   
    Oh dear Billy is throwing his toys out of his prama gain. 
    I have no interest in what worldly governments led by Satan are doing.  The JW Org is supposed to be NO PART OF THE WORLD.... 
    My interest is in ordinary people. Mainly working class and lower class people. People that have not got money or power nor a good education, and basically have to do as they are told by secular laws, police, big business bosses, et al. 
    Jesus was interested in those people that were down trodden and poor. Those people that were 'walked over' by the religious leaders of the Nation of Israel. 
    I see you've given me another title. It must make you feel so grand being able to dish out titles to people. 'Oh yes we'll just put another label on him'... So funny Kid. 
    But with all all the worldly info' you spout, it does not detract from the truth about JW Org. JW Org is rigged and it's faulty according to James. I would call it a lot worse, but being polite I'll just say it is, hypocritical and disgusting, and full of lies and false teachings, and run by men that think they are important. 
     
     
     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.