Pudgy

You are not in Kansas, anymore.

Your bluster is irrelevant.

HERE IS WHAT YOU ACTUALLY POSTED!!!

YIKES!

First of all, I have no criminal record which is immaterial and irrelevant to a discussion of quantum physics.

You are trying to attack my credibility with ad-hominem attacks to deflect from your colossal incompetence.

If I was a Nazi mass-murderer chained to a wall in Spandau Prison, what I stated here would still be true … and if you were an angel from God your irrelevant bullshit would STILL be irrelevant bullshit.

You have PROVED here you havn’t got the SLIGHTEST clue what you are talking about … with every sentence.

This is NOT the JW open club … we are NOT discussing theology, we are discussing the physics of light, which your statements and bluffs CLEARLY show you have no understanding at all … None Whatsoever!

I wii have to admit, you got balls the size of an elephant to try an backup your complete drivel about Quantum Electrodynamics with that bogus book on intimate relationships, and ad-hominem attacks. 

If you were a cow, that cowboy with the rifle might advise you to wipe that foam off of your mouth!

Whew!

Even your own explanation above shows you know NOTHING about the subject being discussed, Georgie.

…. but …. but … your command of bullshit is unparalled! 

Even surpassing Bill Clinton’s ability to razzle dazzle.

The problem is that your garbage is based on the assumption that everyone else BUT YOU is stupid, and can’t tell the difference.

HAHAhahaaahaaHaHAHAAaa !!!!

What a FAKER!

Did you think I was  not going  to check it out?

Without your being able to describe the ideas here, I reject them outright.

So far they are vague, nebulous, convoluted, and wrong.

The photo of a book cover only shows that you have a photo of a book cover. From the text on the cover it may be about office management.

If you are going to throw fogballs, at least put rocks in them.

How would that solution address light entering a black hole if quantum tunneling does not exist?

Light is absorbed by the black hole.

It’ BLACK.

The same principle applies to zero distance. Now, the greater question is, how can light illuminate from inside a black hole where there is no illumination?

WHAT principal? What “zero distance”?

There is no light inside a black hole. Gravity sucked it in, and it turned into heat!

Both principles result in a zero distance cancelation.

What “both principles”?

What cancelled out what????

The same concept applies to creation.

What concept? and how would it apply to creation???

How can science demonstrate the beginning of creation from nothing, including light?  

Because creation of the Universe BY DEFINITION was …. created!

Since nothing is known  by anyone what the physics was before the Big Bang, “science” does not even TRY TO demonstrate ANYTHING before the BB.

Space and time is only ONE THING … Spacetime, and in this Universe time started somewhere around 13.7 billion years ago

Then the light wave and or a particle cannot be introduced.

I have no idea what that means but It’s a really safe bet it’s wrong. 

According to the zero distance principle, for the Big Bang Theory to occur …. 

What is this “zero distance principle”?There is no such thing as a zero distance. And theorys do not occur …. events occur.

… there must have been some form of existence prior to the collision that generated the effect.

I suspect on the other side of the BB is what we refer to as “Heaven”, where there is no entropic “arrow of time”, and because of that, Jehovah living “from everlasting to everlasting”, always having been and always will be, is the way that dimension’s physics work.

What collision? No theory I have ever read presupposes a collision of anything to generate the BB.

 At least not anything that has any evidence of any sort.

Quantum tunneling does exist

Quantum tunneling diodes are available commercially.

Absolutely NOTHING is known by anybody about the physics before the Big Bang.

Black holes will eventually evaporate through Hawking Radiation, in very deep time. At least “the math” says they will. Stick around and see!

In reality there is no such thing as “zero distance”.

The Planck length is approximately \(1.616229(38) \times 10^{-35}\) meters. far beyond the reach of any current experimental technology, and is considered the smallest theoretical length in physics/reality.

Light cannot propagate across zero distance unless there is quantum tunneling.

The theory had been around since 1945 as the “Wheeler-Feynman AbsorptionTheory” but was proved by experiment only a few years ago.

Recent experiments have proved the concept of “advanced” and “retarded” light, which means that each photon emitted from any source, at any frequency is FIRST triggered by the return  signal which goes backwards in time FROM whatever WILL ABSORB IT, at the other end., be it nanometers away, or at the edge of the Universe.

The “trigger”, signal is called the “Advanced Photon”

You know that as you approach the speed of light, time slows down. AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT, time stops.

ON A PHOTON …. time is completely stopped, so a trillion years travel time does not affect it at all.

Travel time of a photon from point “A” to point “B” may take 30 billion years, and the return photon (the “Advanced Photon”) Photon that allows it to release may take negative 30 billion years, but to EITHER photon it’s almost instantaneous, except for a few nanoseconds where the photon traveling backwards in time arrives at the local source BEFORE the light leaves the local source.

The local photon generated (… say from a candle …) is called the “retarded photon”.

Cool, huh?

…. merely a cartoon dog sitting on a cartoon sofa, watching a cartoon guy cartoon choking on the floor, because whenever the guy is challenged to prove anything … anything at all … on any subject ….  that’s the only thing he can do.

Hmmmm…. reminds me of you, Georgie!

The only thing you can do is choke.

47 minutes ago, George88 said:

When scripture requires open repentance, private repentance is not enough. It is vital to demonstrate your change to yourself and others. At this point, it is important to deepen your understanding of scripture.

…. and of course you are the arbiter of this, continually making judgments on this for people you do not know, have never met, and might live on the other side of the planet.

With TOTAL IGNORANCE of what may or not be going on beyond your view, you judge everybody as inferior to you, and that they are scum. 

The presumptiousness of this is staggering to behold.

8 minutes ago, George88 said:

By the way, I suggest not deflect on your incorrect statement regarding King David's Courts.

I never mentioned King David’s Courts AT ALL!

“Given that I have consistently demonstrated numerous proofs countless times …” 

Saying that is not the same as doing that.

EVERY TIME I have asked you prove some delusional slander you have choked. 

The count is now holding at 42 times.

Oh … and on that last one I am still waiting for that ONE EXAMPLE ….

…. and for your last response, just ONE VALID reference from Biblical or Secular history would prove you are not making everything up out of thin air.

Got Milk?

15 minutes ago, George88 said:

Once again, you're mistaken. To make that true, I would need to show any concern for the dorks in this place. I believe that's the term Tom utilized. In essence, my focus lies solely on the public.…

I find it strangely satisfying to be able to prove your delusions WITH YOUR OWN WORDS.

Once again, you are pontificating in vague generalizations …

What specific statement did I make that was not correct? 

Your comments are on your own state of mind … NOT anything I stated.…

.... there is a difference.

What I find simply amazing, Georgie, and reprehensible, is that you have appointed yourself the Vicar of Warwick AND the vehement arbiter of who has repented and who has not.

During King David's time, there's no mention of prisons in the biblical texts.  Punishment for crimes was carried out through various means such as fines, exile, or physical punishment rather than prisons.

If it had not been published in the Bible that King David repented of adultery AND first degree murder …. you would NEVER know.

There is NO WAY for you to know either way about private conversations between a penitent and God.

…. and frankly … it is none of your business.

… George88 is experienced in such nuances.

9 hours ago, Manuel Boyet Enicola said:

Any comments, thoughts or otherwise? 

well … if I got paid five cents a word, this would make seventy cents.

…years ago, I helped build a Bethel Complex in Lima, Peru, during a civil war where the Sendero Luminiso (“Shining Path” ) was blowing up power transmission line towers in Lima, and the Presidente Belaunde regime was replaced by communists.

The Kingdom Hall was half underground as a precaution against gunfire, and even it had windows.

Most locations do not need that level of security. 

When I make wild-ass guesses, I clearly label them as such. When you do it, for you, it redefines reality.