Pudgy

14 minutes ago, Fausto Hoover said:

You seem to only seek sympathy from your apostate friends. It is ironic how you compare yourself to Adolf Hitler, as the facts seem to align with that comparison. Concerning the pressing duty to protect apostates at any expense, that is a matter to be settled between you and God. The poster consistently and relentlessly pursues his driven agenda to defend apostates. How do you compare?

I don’t defend apostates … I defend Truth and Hard Irrefutable Facts, irregardless of the source.

Things which you consistantly downvote because they do not fit your agenda.

This has been proven many times, using your own words against you.

1 hour ago, Fausto Hoover said:

Your reference holds no significance and only serves to reveal the true nature of the man behind the dog to the public. That's just the way it is. This individual appearsy to constantly seek confrontation, showing a lack of reform. It is a striking illustration of a character that only resonates with former members, who exhibit similar behavior.

PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHAT I JUST POSTED!

Opinion without a rational basis … driven ONLY by your WDS Agenda.

3 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

CSA is a different type of action that your friend here is part of in an indirect way. So, please refrain from complicating the matter with misplaced empathy, as it only tarnishes your image. 

3 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

I attempted to show kindness to a malevolent individual, only to be repaid with such ingratitude from that evil man. Not again. The person who has been disfellowshipped lacks any compassion for what is right and instead only shows self-serving indignation.

One “sad” vote does not compensate for 68 irrational agenda driven “down” votes.

Even Adolph Hitler liked dogs.

In the science of Hydrology there is something called the “Manning Formula”, which is used to predict how much rainfall will fall on a certain piece of land. With this information, a designer can have a rational basis for designing pipes, ditches, canals, etc. In fact, it is also called “The Rational Formula”. And of course, rain doesn’t always behave as one might expect, historically.

You may not LIKE my analysis of you, but it DOES have a rational basis.

Or what?

I have been disfellowshipped twice in my life, the latest I initiated, and it was quite the experience to see family and friends cut “love” off,  and back on, and back off again, like a light switch.

I have come to believe, by actual real life test, not some theory, is that “love” that can do that …. isn’t.

Of course, such fantasies are sometimes useful, so we don’t drown our ugly children at birth.

Someone who tends to clutter a conversation with self-evident facts and unnecessary verbosity might be described using words like:

1. Pedantic
2. Verbose
3. Redundant
4. Long-winded
5. Circumlocutory
6. Prolix
7. Wordy
8. Repetitive
9. Rambling
10. Tautological

These words emphasize various aspects of someone's communication style that involves excessive or unnecessary elaboration on self-evident points.

Too much of that makes you want to scream and run down the hallway with your hair on fire, just to ease the pain.

… DUH !

Oops …. 2007 - 2023.

It’s a sad day of tears in our house tonite, Barkey our 16 year old little chihuahua, who had cataracts and eye ulcers, and only three teeth, and has been really sick for two months, has died.

I know there is no scriptural basis for it, but I pray to Jehovah to remember him, and show mercy for this little dog, when our loved ones are resurrected.

He was a very mild tempered and affectionate member of our family

Tomorrow I will build a wooden funeral pyre in the front yard for him.

The Universe is big enough for many “Rainbow Bridges”.

I hope and pray that Jehovah will entertain the idea.

And yet …. HERE YOU ARE !

HahahaHAHaa !

…. and except for your sock puppets, NONE  of them like you ….

As I have proven over and over and over, year after year, your attacks on me are ONLY your opinion, and also as I have proven, many times with your own words used against you, are slanderous lies.

What audience are you playing to, anyway?

There is probably not ten people following this debate. 

The difference between my ad hominem attacks on you, and your ad hominem  attacks on me,  is it that mine are based on solid established facts, usually proven by your own words, over and over and over again …… and yours are based solely on your opinions, which are goofier than the Disney dog Goofy.

Always…. when you are beaten … you revert to ad hominem attacks. 

… but even those fail. 

.

1 hour ago, Errikos Tsiamis said:

What reason could be someone from the exclusive club have to support such a claim?  …

…. It would be quite offensive if that person were to upvote.

Simple biology, Sherlock Holmes.

A perfect man who does not have the ability to father children is BY DEFINITION, defective …. therefore cannot be perfect.

…. and with THAT, you and Freddie's entire chains of logic and liberal tree hugger theological arguments of the last three days and several pages here collapses.

If Jesus did not have the ability to father a child, he would have been defective.

8 minutes ago, Fausto Hoover said:

The best part is that you'll go first and without any chance for redemption. Good luck, apostate, and enjoy life to the fullest while you still can.

If you were not a naturally evil person, you would have phrased that differently.

5 minutes ago, Fausto Hoover said:

The confusion arises from a combination of ignorance and a strong desire to win a debate. Commentators persist in muddling the concept of imperfection, and now they aspire to limit its reach for their own advantage. Nevertheless, the ongoing discussion has been derailed by apostates who are distorting its original purpose, and the same distortion continues in this forum.

Your logical reasoning is so twisted when you die, they are going to have to screw you into the ground.

I had to think about it for a while, because my first thought was that if Jesus had a child it would be a hybrid and not be perfect…… Better than many or  most, but not perfect.

But then again I thought about the example of Jehovah God being a father Of Jesus, and Mary was an imperfect woman, so I guess you can have a hybrid birth and the offspring still be perfect.

This whole discussion reminds me of a satire on the Golden Age of Comics, which was during the 1930’s and 1940’s.

Yep.

…. and Eric, you are confusing two entirely separate things. 

By not being perfect, Adam and Eve lost any advantages of the natural consequences that being perfect brings.

Eternal life

Superior genetics

The ability to have two way conversations with the Creator

… and many others.

It’s like when an employee is just “not working out” and is belligerent, disobedient, insubordinate, lazy, or just refuses to “get with the program”.

I have had to fire, or recommend that they be fired, and they had to pack up their stuff in cardboard boxes, and be escorted off the property.

Not having employment, many lives fell apart, and were ruined.

But as “unsuitable” as they were, and denied the “blessings” of a good job, THEY WERE NOT MY ENEMIES.

An ENEMY is someone marked for death and YOU ARE the one that actively seeks to KILL THEM.

If the fired employee takes his cardboard box home, and dies of a a stroke or heart attack, “Stuff Happens”. 

But, he is NOT THE ENEMY.

An ENEMY is someone you seek out and cut their throat with a sharp knife when they are sleeping, because they are a real, clear, and present danger.

Babies are not a real, clear and present danger.

Jehovah has the Sovereign right to kill any of us at any time for any reason, or no reason at all, even babies, as he did in Egypt so long ago.

That does NOT MAKE babies natural enemies of God.

Perfect common sense rebuttal!

And the logic and reasoning is theologically sound, reasonable, and the logic is solid, Srecko Sostar.

.