-
Posts
4,676 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
93
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
World Wiki
Events
Everything posted by Pudgy
-
Oh, by the way … boyle says I insulted his family. Another paranoid lie from someone who deliberately misunderstands most things. I challenge you to prove or disprove that lie by quoting what I actually said.
- 171 replies
-
- flood
- true science
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
It’ simple math! 1.2.3.4. 1.) if Eduardo = Edward, then 2.) Albert = Alfred, and 3.) Edward = Alfred, and therefore 4.) Alfred Einstein was the Batman’s Butler! Seeee ? … it’s all about relativity! ( …. and reducto ad absurdism, for those in Rio Linda …) … so you can see that Eduardo is not the same thing as Edward, nicht wahr?
- 171 replies
-
- flood
- true science
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
- 171 replies
-
- flood
- true science
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
…. Just “rattling your chain” boyle, checking to see if you have a sense of humor ….
- 171 replies
-
- flood
- true science
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
yeah … I remember Eddie. Always pretending he was not Eddie Haskell, from “Leave it to Beaver”. When he grew up he became. LAPD cop, so he could still bully people around.
- 171 replies
-
- flood
- true science
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Soon enough … perhaps too soon … WE WILL ALL KNOW. Every day I enjoy being alive … but having been “dead” for 13-1/2 billion years before I was conceived didn’t seem to inconvenience me at all !
-
All that you mentioned above I can look out my window and discern … if I am there. Knowing …or not knowing is completely irrelevant , to me …. BECAUSE …. If I know, or don’t know, because soon I will be dead, and get a real test.
-
Much like the profound unintentional observations in the first episode of “Star Trek - Deep Space Nine”.
- 171 replies
-
- flood
- true science
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Audrey: it’ just that I try never to say anything without solid reference-able proof, as I expect to be challenged on every word , as I and everyone should be. Basic rule: If any supposition or reference can’t be independently verified, it can be ignored. As an example, I almost never quote scriptures, except from memory, and I always add (paraphrased), indicating it’s the general idea if I don’t give a citation.
-
EXJWs Are Going to the U.S. Capitol
Pudgy replied to Witness's topic in Jehovah’s Witnesses's Topics
Oh boy! CAT FIGHT! If it wasn’t my nap time, I would stay to watch! -
EXJWs Are Going to the U.S. Capitol
Pudgy replied to Witness's topic in Jehovah’s Witnesses's Topics
Scott Adams is not disfellowshipped. …. when your arguments and perspective are agenda driven, you are always wrong. -
EXJWs Are Going to the U.S. Capitol
Pudgy replied to Witness's topic in Jehovah’s Witnesses's Topics
No one really needs to “misrepresent the Watchtower”. All the “New Light” that has come out in the last 50 years speaks for itself that even the WTB& TS ….. with dozens of supporting scriptures for each previous doctrine espoused …. got it wrong. Spiritual “New Light” is an admission that previous teachings were in fact wrong. When you DON’T realize that, it’s misrepresentation. -
I envision Armageddon to be the Nations being led, as if with hooks in their jaws to Global Thermonuclear War …. Where the elements being intensely hot will melt. But hey! You say “ … that would kill Jehovah’s people tOoooo!”. Not necessarily …. did not Jehovah protect the three Hebrew men in the blast furnace with personal “force fields”? They came out not even smelling of smoke! Otherwise …. What else could common sense tell you about what that scripture about “… the elements being intensely hot will melt” actually mean? uh….. in context.