-
Posts
4,676 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
93
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
World Wiki
Events
Posts posted by Pudgy
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
My best guess is that the Scripture in Genesis was talking ONLY about events of that time, and see nothing to indicate otherwise.
My best guess is that the Scripture in Matthew was talking ONLY about events of that time, and see nothing to indicate otherwise.
My best guess is that EBP is conflating two entirely different things, like trying to force a relationship between a hippopotamus, and a brick.
-
I took a look again at the yellow signs posted above just to make sure, and I did not see anything about any dates whatsoever.
I believe it is you who are missing the point, conflating at least two or more completely different ideas.
I would say but let’s say that the number is 120, OK well you can use the formula “a year for a day“ and multiply the 120 x 365 days in a year. Then you take that number and multiply by 1000 because “ A day with the Lord is as 1000 years and a 1000 years is a day“, and what do you get?
You get 43,800,000 YEARS!
AND HERE IS THE PROOF, PRODUCED ON THE FINEST CALCULATOR THE EARTH HAS EVER PRODUCED!!!!!!!!!
so, looking at the above absolute proof verified by the finest calculator ever made, what does it all mean?
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING !
-
48 minutes ago, BroRando said:
… and why not add 220, 320, or 420 years? Why not say the year 2525, and work backwards?
-
I read your article, and I did not see anything about 2034. What’s with that?
Why not add 220 years to 1914, and be just as ambiguous about 2134?
-
Two more promotions, and I can be a Nemesis!
-
1 hour ago, TrueTomHarley said:
Hate to say it but grinding extra coffee this morning, I absentmindedly put it in the waiting coffee press, rather than the spare jar, resulting in 10X normal strength coffee. Nothing to be done about it but throw the mess out.
I did that several weeks ago, but don’t like to waste coffee. When I blinked it punched holes in the end of my socks!
-
10 hours ago, Patiently waiting for Truth said:
Oh dear again. It's now gone from politics to racism.
Oh and of course the continuing of name calling.
Wally seems concerned about what visitors to this forum might think, what with all us deplorables hanging out.
I shudder to think what Dana Carvey, the SNL “Church Lady” would see …….
-
-
Tanks for da memories …..
-
The first step in being able to never go crazy is to be determined never to go crazy, and do what is necessary for that to happen.
Arauna is correct.
As the Black Knight said in the movie “Monty Python’s Search for the Holy Grail”, in a sword fight with the King of England, when the Knight got his arm cut off up to the shoulder ….
”Merely a flesh wound …”.
A great theological discussion was alluded to in the third chapter of “I, Robot” which has some profound real world applications.
Well worth the effort (and fun) to read, and I have attached a PDF file below……
-
And THAT, Wally, is what a civil discussion looks like!
-
-
-
39 minutes ago, WalterPrescott said:
Good question. Who are these people, that come here to distort scripture and weaponize politics? It's bad enough to subject oneself to the garbage ExJW's have to offer like Pudgy, we have to read the same from actual pretend witnesses. What is TTH thinking of. He "demands" respect, but not from a dog! Go, figure how the mentally ill work.
Who is this “we” you speak of Wally ….?
It seems VERY clear that your above stated expectation that TTH should demand respect from a 2D cartoon dog makes it very clear how the mentally ill work.
-
-
From the Cartoon Network I understand that Caleb dropped out of High School and went to Bethel, and Sophia is married to a Marine at Fort Bliss in ElPaso, Texas, and is expecting twins.
-
……. “Call the Cops.”
HahaHaahaahaha!
-
Just “for the record”, Wally has once again grabbed a “buzz word”, completely misconstrued what was said for his own Evil Agenda, spun it into a presumptuous web of false premises, and turned it into a nasty gram.
My sole statement was about the MORAL considerations of self defense, and his absurd castigation was about the LEGAL concept of the “Castle Doctrine”, which had no application to my presented scenario.
Remember ….. this was an illustration to illustrate why Russia MIGHT be justified in invading Ukraine, to knock out their biological warfare research and production facilities.
The “Castle Doctrine” is a USA LEGAL principle that says you can defend your home with deadly force … at home. (simplified version …..)
Extreme arrogance and belligerence typical, actually, of almost every post Wally makes.
-
I think Wally is trying to tell us something about his racial persuasion …. I never gave it any thought before, but “methinks he doth protest too much”.
Bible Prophecy and 2034. Will you gain spiritual discernment to become a Survivor of the Last Days?
in Topics
Posted
I don’t presume to answer for Arauna or anyone else, Wally, but by whatever name you have assumed as camouflage over the years you have always been the exact same insulting, denigrating bully, always trying to exalt yourself by putting others down.
No one here is defending me for real or imagined sins, it’s just that they are not jumping onto the “Let’s Have A Witch Hunt Wally Bandwagon”.
You have excused your observable nastiness by saying (paraphrased) “What would visitors to this site think ? …” about my presence here.
They may observe directly that you are angry, belligerent, a liar and a slanderer (proven here by your own words), you call fine people here fools, stupid, and ignorant, and tell them to shut up when they don’t agree with you, and on and on and on.
By direct observation you have shown you are incapable of having a civil conversation without trying to put someone down, for your own aggrandizement.
You are entitled to your viewpoints, whether they be valid, or loony tunes, but you are NOT entitled to be mean, nasty and insulting, as everyone here has continually and directly observed.
Please correct me if anything I have said is wrong, or unfair.
To be taken seriously, be SPECIFIC (or “SPRESIFIC”, if you prefer …).