Pudgy

No moderator added this. It's an artifact of your own editing. You evidently started out "i smell" when you were writing "i smell a troll . . ." But when you were editing your post to change the "i" to "I" and use highlighting and color, you had moved that original line too far down in the editing window, and forgot to edit it back out, because you probably couldn't see it.
I think I can edit people's posts, but I won't do it. I know I can delete a post entirely. Although, in the past, instead of deleting posts (when I have no request to delete) I merely move them to a new topic. But I think you would prefer this gets deleted. So, unless you say otherwise in the next few minutes, I will try to delete the whole post. To clean it all up, I think I should then clean up a few of the other remarks that were part of this, including one from Anna and perhaps others.
I think that most people who post here regularly are already aware that you ARE the same person behind the accounts: Allen Smith, Billy The Kid, NoisySrecko, Dmitar, Leander H McNeely, etc., etc., etc. There is no real question about that for many of us. But that fact has already been brought up elsewhere.

I bet you're fun at parties! 

Huh! This new guy doesn’t like JWI. Who would have thunk it?

As an example, I did notice that you tried to divert the fact that you DID NOT even ATTEMPT to answer the incredibly simple and direct question, and instead responding with an ad hominem attack.…. an obvious and standard response of someone who realizes his premises are not valid, but is determined to win an argument based on arrogance, alone, knowing he is wrong.
 
 

And actually, the Universe was specifically designed to run COMPLETELY by itself. That is why there is a Planck Constant and a specific Planck Number that never changes that is the DNA of sub-atomic quantum reactions that make the Universe EXACTLY PREDICTABLE, and allows us to make stuff that ALWAYS behaves EXACTLY the same, and allows us to make things like the phone or computer we type on, and send messages around the world, and back from Voyager 1 Space Probe, launched in 1977, and still transmitting from interstellar space.
So far, Peter Carroll, you have been wrong about everything you have said, because your thinking is agenda driven, based on repeating other people’s feel-good Ill-thought out theology ….. and woefully short on facts.
It would serve you well to get a detailed Periodic Table of the Elements, and learn what all those numbers mean, so you will understand that the Universe was actually designed to operate all by itself, without any maintenance or oversight whatsoever.
….. become an expert on understanding what a Planck Constant and Number is, and why it’s important.
You will be much happier, and MUCH more credible.
AND … lose the need to try and denegrate others as a compulsive reflex.

And actually, the Universe was specifically designed to run COMPLETELY by itself. That is why there is a Planck Constant and a specific Planck Number that never changes that is the DNA of sub-atomic quantum reactions that make the Universe EXACTLY PREDICTABLE, and allows us to make stuff that ALWAYS behaves EXACTLY the same, and allows us to make things like the phone or computer we type on, and send messages around the world, and back from Voyager 1 Space Probe, launched in 1977, and still transmitting from interstellar space.
So far, Peter Carroll, you have been wrong about everything you have said, because your thinking is agenda driven, based on repeating other people’s feel-good Ill-thought out theology ….. and woefully short on facts.
It would serve you well to get a detailed Periodic Table of the Elements, and learn what all those numbers mean, so you will understand that the Universe was actually designed to operate all by itself, without any maintenance or oversight whatsoever.
….. become an expert on understanding what a Planck Constant and Number is, and why it’s important.
You will be much happier, and MUCH more credible.
AND … lose the need to try and denegrate others as a compulsive reflex.

No sorrow means the “New Scrolls” that are opened will explain. 
Perhaps the New System is ALSO the Rainbow Bridge, and God never mentioned it before, because dogs get in free.
Just a guess……

Here I know I will garner Pudgy’s sincere sympathy—one dog lover to another—when I reveal my own friend took that route not three weeks ago: 

It was the young birds counting as one year each that cracked me up ….
A truly magnificent piece of almost real, almost believable.

Me too. But then I remembered JWI said he was trying to be good. Would he really create a whole post showing himself to be "bad" I wondered...Or is he just bored...
This is funny, here we are debating the intentions of the writer instead of the contents, lol.
But you must admit, the title of the post sounds a bit tongue in cheek....

I know where I’d like to point your A…..

I tried to follow all of that, but my eyes glazed over, and my fur caught on fire.

Wow! Well here's me fussing over whether the "slave" has all the scriptures interpreted correctly and all the while we had a prophet among us! 
Of course Tom has to make a joke of all this lest he was struck down by lightning if he admitted that this is ingenious. 
Seriously though, I will have to re-read this properly tomorrow!

I tried to follow all of that, but my eyes glazed over, and my fur caught on fire.

Cartoon dogs are completely lacking in rear end “equipment”. Oh sure! … we eat, and drink, but after that nothing happens. 
This became the norm after the defeat that ended the 1870’s French Poodle Cartoonists Rebellion.

I tried to follow all of that, but my eyes glazed over, and my fur caught on fire.

Cartoon dogs are completely lacking in rear end “equipment”. Oh sure! … we eat, and drink, but after that nothing happens. 
This became the norm after the defeat that ended the 1870’s French Poodle Cartoonists Rebellion.

WHAT!!?? After I have overhauled my entire theology?!
Thanks a lot, bub! I’m sending Pudgy over to pee on your leg.

I tried to follow all of that, but my eyes glazed over, and my fur caught on fire.

So here in Genesis 15 we have a verse of the Bible, which in context is about the Abrahamic Covenant and is also a very clear discussion of chronology. It points out the time, the actual number of years, when the heirs of Abraham would inherit the land promised to him and his seed. It not only speaks to the chronology in years, but mentions the number of generations that would overlap until the time had reached its full measure!
Note first of all that the number of years of age of each animal is mentioned, so it must be important. 3 years + 3 years + 3 years. The age of the birds is not so specified, but the word "young" is mentioned indicating that they are about 1 year old each. So we have 3 + 3 + 3 + 1 + 1 = 11 years of age total. 11 times 360 prophetic days in each year is a total of 3,960 days, therefore 3,960 years.
So when did this covenant with Abraham's go into effect? The Insight book gives us the starting point:
*** it-1 p. 29 Abraham ***
Sojourn in Canaan. Now 75 years old, Abraham began to move his household out of Haran to the land of Canaan, where he lived out the remaining hundred years of his life in tents as an alien and migratory resident. (Ge 12:4) It was following the death of his father Terah that Abraham went out from Haran in 1943 B.C.E. and crossed the Euphrates River, evidently on the 14th day of the month that later became known as Nisan. (Ge 11:32; Ex 12:40-43, LXX) It was at that time that the covenant between Jehovah and Abraham went into effect, and the 430-year period of temporary residence until the making of the Law covenant with Israel began.—Ex 12:40-42; Ga 3:17.
So we start with the year 1943 BCE. But we also make a necessary adjustment, the same one made by C.T.Russell, as mentioned in our book "God's Kingdom of a Thousand Years - Has Approached!" (ka):
*** ka chap. 11 pp. 206-208 “Here Is the Bridegroom!” ***
THE CORRECTING OF A MISUNDERSTANDING
…  The above chronology followed the suggestion that was made in Wilson’s The Emphatic Diaglott, in its footnote on Acts 13:20, which verse read: “And after these things, he gave Judges about four hundred and fifty years, till Samuel the prophet.” The footnote on this reading of the verse said:
A difficulty occurs here which has very much puzzled Biblical chronologists. The date given here is at variance with the statement found in 1 Kings 6:1. There have been many solutions offered, but only one which seems entirely satisfactory, i.e., that the text in 1 Kings 6:1 has been corrupted, by substituting the Hebrew character daleth (4) for hay (5) which is very similar in form. This would make 580 years (instead of 480) from the exode to the building of the temple, and exactly agree with Paul’s chronology.
51 Accordingly, on page 53 of the book entitled “The Time Is at Hand,” author C. T. Russell wrote, referring to 1 Kings 6:1:
It evidently should read the five-hundred-and-eightieth year, and was possibly an error in transcribing; for if to Solomon’s four years we add David’s forty, and Saul’s space of forty, and the forty-six years from leaving Egypt to the division of the land, we have one hundred and thirty years, which deducted from four hundred and eighty would leave only three hundred and fifty years for the period of the Judges, instead of the four hundred and fifty years mentioned in the Book of Judges, and by Paul, as heretofore shown. The Hebrew character “daleth” (4) very much resembles the character “hay” (5), and it is supposed that in this way the error has occurred, possibly the mistake of a transcriber. I Kings 6:1, then, should read five hundred and eighty, and thus be in perfect harmony with the other statements.
Thus, by inserting 100 years into the Bible chronology during the period of the Judges, man’s creation was pushed back 100 years . . .
So there we have it: 1945 BCE + 100 years = 2045 BCE. 3,960 years from 2045 = 1915 and since there was no zero year, that brings us exactly to 1914.
Please let me know what you think. Let me know if I have made any mistakes or false assumptions.

Hanging out with Quaid at a Martian beach resort?

Whew!
It seems we both agree, but my explanation is only three words:
BELIEVE NO ONE
(…. easier to remember ….)

It's click "bait".