Pudgy

…. Marker to hold this spot until I finish my nap ….

When people are afraid of the government there is tranny, and the government is afraid of the people, there is freedom.
Australia has been disarmed, and is galloping toward totalitarianism.
 

Is this to benefit them, or to satisfy the governments needs for privacy. Each country determines their privacy laws. That's why in the USA, they have the "freedom of information act" to give people access to information that is keep from public view.
In the UK,
 Privacy in the UK There is no freestanding right to privacy in the UK, with the courts repeatedly stating that “English law knows no common law tort of invasion of privacy.” [10] As an alternative, the cause of action for breach of confidence has been extended to encompass misuse of wrongful dissemination of private information. 
In Australia, the Data protection act.
Australia regulates data privacy and protection through a mix of federal, state and territory laws. The federal Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) (Privacy Act) and the Australian Privacy Principles ("APPs") contained in the Privacy Act apply to private sector entities (including body corporates, partnerships, trusts and unincorporated associations) with an annual turnover of at least AU$3 million, and all Commonwealth Government and Australian Capital Territory Government agencies.
Information Privacy Act 2014 (Australian Capital Territory) Information Act 2002 (Northern Territory)
Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (New South Wales)
Information Privacy Act 2009 (Queensland)
Personal Information Protection Act 2004 (Tasmania), and
Privacy and Data Protection Act 2014 (Victoria)
The Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment (Assistance and Access) Act 2018 (Cth) (“AA Act”) provides law enforcement agencies with access to encrypted data for serious crime investigation and imposes obligations on "Designated Communications Providers". However, the AA Act may inadvertently have a much broader remit with limited judicial oversight, and has been the subject of much criticism from local and global technology firms which have stated the legislation has the potential to significantly impact security / encryption solutions in Australia.
In Canada,
 
Revised : January 2018
There are several laws in Canada that relate to privacy rights. Enforcement of these laws is handled by various government organizations and agencies.
Several factors determine which laws apply and who oversees them. Among them:
The nature of the organization handling the personal information Is it a federal government institution? Is it a provincial or territorial government institution? Is it private sector? Is it engaged in commercial activities? Is it a federally regulated business? Where is the organization based? What type of information is involved? Does the information cross provincial or national borders? Therefore, no former Jehovah's Witness is going to tell that institution how to break government laws to suit their personal agenda of misinformation.
It's an earthly organization that is governed by secular authority also. Just like in the times of Jesus, or have you forgotten that.

Since you can only down vote once, I'll give you this one. A woeful fool needs all the encouragement from Satan to please him. 😏

Another woeful fool making his descent by a down vote. Typical ignorance. When the observation is obtuse, the only response is, reject.

This means you object to the information held by the Government? Do you usually give your private information, such as your address, social security number, phone number, to a stranger or anyone asking you for it?
Can I have your address, Date of Birth, and social security number, since you object to databases?
With this assumption you just made, can I have Pearl Doxsey's home address, phone number, social security number, DOB, etc.?
I assume, since personal data is a stumbling block to the 4Woman Group, you have that info.
Or are you going to renege and refuse to give me the information I'm asking for? If so, Why?
Do you have a database of all former Jehovah's Witnesses, or how about the database of the Vatican that you can share, since you OBJECT to private information held by ANY institution?
I must warn you, in the USA, it's against secular law to make such a breach of private information. But, I'm confident with your resolve, you won't mind spending 10 years in prison. Even for people convicted of murder. So, can I have that info? For internet access, it's called HACKING when someone obtains confidential or private information. They will give any person up to 30 years.
Maybe you, @Patiently waiting for Truth and all other former Jehovah's Witnesses, can band together and enjoy a good prison sentence for the greater good. 
That way we can finally have dirt on people that have fornicated, committed adultery, have homosexual tendencies, spousal abuse, have past convictions of rubbery, arson, assault, etc. Once again, your imprisonment would be for the greater to obtain certain information that is NONE of your business according to the bible 1 Thessalonians 4:11-12 and secular law.
Also, reference, John 21:20-22, Romans 14:4, 1 Peter 4:15
Now information that secular authority contends is for public safety, then you need to reference secular authority protocols, like finding the information of a person placed on probation for child porn. In the USA, States determine how certain information is given. For sex offenders, a database is collected and posted. With your argument, that database would be problematic for you.
Ironically, being placed on probation for CHILD PORN is NOT considered good enough to be placed in a sex offender database in some States. 

I suspect, Dmitar, that you STILL HAVE NOT READ THE ARTICLE, or in calling someone a liar, you would have attached a screenshot of the article  to disprove my contentions, and prove your contentions.
You did not indicate you read that SPECIFIC  1st Issue article, and so now the question remains about who of the two of us is a fraud and a liar.
I know the answer, as do you …. And a screenshot of the Article in the first issue of the Watchtower about “What is Truth” will document which one.
 

I suspect, Dmitar, that you STILL HAVE NOT READ THE ARTICLE, or in calling someone a liar, you would have attached a screenshot of the article  to disprove my contentions, and prove your contentions.
You did not indicate you read that SPECIFIC  1st Issue article, and so now the question remains about who of the two of us is a fraud and a liar.
I know the answer, as do you …. And a screenshot of the Article in the first issue of the Watchtower about “What is Truth” will document which one.
 

When people are afraid of the government there is tranny, and the government is afraid of the people, there is freedom.
Australia has been disarmed, and is galloping toward totalitarianism.
 

Something we Truthers talked about for years. Welcome to the Dystopia. Germany, Israel, United Kingdom, some most of the EU will succumb to come form of Authoritarianism. The Aussies also claimed New World Order, and attempt to make their own fact check of the term when all of us know what it entails.
When it hits the United States, all hell will break loose. Things we see today such as violence, stealing, sex abuse, rape, bribery, greed, etc will be amplified due to the various groups on the left and the right that roam.
The media such as Guardian, NYT, CNN, ABC, etc will play a role in influence, and before we know it, the United Nations may once again attempt to dent specific freedoms as they had attempted to do so twice already.
Truthers are always ready for these things, however, I can't speak for the rest of the people who are not.
Currency and Religion will eventually be on the menu for Authoritarianism, granted religious exemptions are under attack, which has and can break people of faith if not careful.

"In the very first issue of the watchtower magazine there was an article written by Russell under the initials CTR where and he stated with perfect logic and reasoning that if Satan himself tells you the truth, it’s still the truth."
"As usual, Dimitar, your understanding is agenda driven, and demonstratively faulty.
Charles Taze Russel was not speaking favorably about Satan …. He was speaking favorably about TRUTH."
@Pudgy As usual, This character plays with words, or he doesn't understand what he just wrote. 
Pastor Russell's' understanding of Satan was not as you indicate, "if Satan himself tells you the truth, it's still the truth." Your words, not pastor Russell's understanding of Satan as indicated by the majority of his literature.  Therefore, don't hide the fact you are a woeful, foolish liar. I guess being obtuse is a daily habit for you, just like the rest of the former Jehovah's Witnesses here.

Oooh! Ooooh! Oooh! 
( … sits on haunches and waves front paw for attention!) I have one simple question for Dmitar.
Of the several hundred, perhaps thousands of questions Dmitar has asked, most calling for Essay length responses, how many have actually been answered?
I don’t recall any.
Unless he pays ten cents a word for reply’s, with a $5,000 advance retainer, I suspect this trend is what I shall label “Dmitar Normal”.
Canines, as some may know, are a big fan of nuanced satire.
 

Things are so absolutely nutty nowadays, that I’m beginning to wonder if Gog of Magog it’s not a specific personality, and the name Joe Biden comes immediately to mind.
I wish I knew.

As usual, Dimitar, your understanding is agenda driven, and demonstratively faulty.
Charles Taze Russel was not speaking favorably about Satan …. He was speaking favorably about TRUTH.
Scanned copies of the first issue of the Watchtower are almost instantly available on the Internet. If memory serves, the article title is “What Is Truth?”.
As usual, you gave your disassociative diatribe BEFORE you read the article, and as usual were wrong and blusterous.
You could at least TRY to be funny. Occasionally that in itself is  inadvertently funny.
If sad and pathetic is what you were looking for ….. you NAILED it!
 

Things are so absolutely nutty nowadays, that I’m beginning to wonder if Gog of Magog it’s not a specific personality, and the name Joe Biden comes immediately to mind.
I wish I knew.

As usual, Dimitar, your understanding is agenda driven, and demonstratively faulty.
Charles Taze Russel was not speaking favorably about Satan …. He was speaking favorably about TRUTH.
Scanned copies of the first issue of the Watchtower are almost instantly available on the Internet. If memory serves, the article title is “What Is Truth?”.
As usual, you gave your disassociative diatribe BEFORE you read the article, and as usual were wrong and blusterous.
You could at least TRY to be funny. Occasionally that in itself is  inadvertently funny.
If sad and pathetic is what you were looking for ….. you NAILED it!
 

Is the Bible a book with a linear text or a non-linear one?
People who, after many centuries, and after various written Old and New Testament texts, came up with the idea to collect writings and try to arrange them in chronological order left us a book as we know it today.
Various Bible scholars, as well as other ordinary people, have sought to find the hidden meanings of literal or prophetic or symbolic words. That would mean trying to understand the Bible in a non-linear way. That is why there are various footnotes, links and other non-biblical and secular texts that interpret Biblical texts and enable the reader to "explore".
Because the Bible does not contain information or clues as to what was before Adam and Eve in heaven and whether angels were also subjected to a test of faithfulness like the people of Eden, we can only assume.
Eternity and immortality, are there any differences? Maybe only linguistically (semantic), because these values do not exist experientially in people's lives, and are therefore in some way meaningless to discuss. Except in a philosophical sense. What part of religious belief (doctrine) is the philosophical part in the lives of JW believers? It is similar with the use of the terms perfect, imperfect, sinful and sinless.
And so. It is now clearer why GB thinks they are acting flawlessly (blamelessly) in various actions.
They can err but such errors are not for reproach. 
 

Jehovah's Witnesses have a secret database in their online library full of questionable material they wrote. They "have nothing to hide" but keep access to this portion of the website under lock and key. What could be so bad that it needs to be hidden from their millions of followers?
 
 

Here's the link:  https://4womaninthewilderness.blogspot.com/
I've never heard of a secret portal only accessible for supposed elite "members" who read at a blog.  
There is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known.  Luke 12:2
 

Yet you are not of government or a bank/firm but you hold your word as bond? Hypocritical. One does not have to be of a faith community or some institution to understand a YouTube video with an opinion which can be murky with information based on such; as with all videos in association, people who have their own say, even in disagreement, their silenced/marked as spam (keeping the narrative one sided), so much so they are accused of being one of JWs prior - we've been down this road before, and even recently in the other thread, use legitimate sources.
Opinions anyone can have, but you have to understand, facts are everything.
That being said, this isn't the first time you did this, and you continue to do this all the time, so you can and will be called out on it.
Again, there are 2 types of JWs, the normal formers, and the disgruntled, both sides do not agree with each other on a number of things just because he is a former member turned disgruntled, does not mean everything should be accepted as truth without legitimately looking into it, i.e. a Former Bethel member who did nearly the same thing only because JWs do not fancy Pansexuals (there is a video on that). The irony here in this regard, you essentially discouraged yourself from doing research.
Clearly one does not have to be a JW to realize that God made 2 sexes/genders - male and female.
Again, at least do the research instead of simply looking a few seconds of an video and brand it as arbiter of truth.
The JWs are not perfect, they are as imperfect as can be, but one needs to understand facts outweighs falsehood and opinions, granted in regards to facts, there is evidence to claim.

"riddled with opinions", said by a man who was never a JW, unlike the narrator of this video who happens to also be a past member of Bethel as well.  His first-hand exposure to the facts, is eye-opening.  
We are each allowed our opinions, but this video can be understood by any exjw, as evidence of hypocrisy by an organization that has kept its complete data base out of sight and access, from the general JW population.  This enables the organization to safely rewrite their history, which they have accomplished.  JWs are discouraged from seeking non JW material, but on the deeper layer of the online library, there is a list of "Non JW" material for the "elite" class to reference.  Does this mean that those individuals with access, are better in some way than the general JW?  No, It only feeds into their power over the lower class of JWs.  
Isa 29:15 - Woe to those who go to great depths to hide their plans from the LORD, who do their work in darkness and think, “Who sees us? Who will know?”
Being a JW, was like swimming in murky water, never clear of truth. (Ezek 34:18 ) These leaders have chosen to build their own cistern, not holding the living water of God and Jesus Christ, but based on the doctrine of men. (John 7:37,38; Eph 4:14; 1 Tim 1:3,4; 2 Tim 4:3,4; Mark 7:7) Their teachings, their "water", is not only poison, but cannot be held in a cracked cistern for very long, and the video has assisted in exposing  just one of its many cracks.  (Heb 12:15; Rev 8:10,11; Jer 2:12,13; 9:3-6,15)
The "secret" online library is nothing but the doctrine of men - of false teachers/false prophets, who have deceived the "elect".  (Matt 24:24,25)
 
Mark of Slavery
 
 

No disrespect, but a single YouTube video riddled with opinion isn't much of a bombshell. As mentioned before, you cannot rely on YouTube videos if you are not too knowing of what the video was professing. You were told this in the last thread, in regards to murkying the water.

…. Cool in the summertime, and protection against Covid-19 !
 

I think the way “selection by God” is usually determined is what kind of costume they wear.
The Popes are always bent over at a thirty degree angle because they are wearing 25 pounds of clothes, lots of gold, and a very tall 15 pound hat.
I think those having God’s approval should wear striped bermuda shorts, and a welder’s helmet with a red clown nose.
Considering the outfits the Jews used to wear in the Temple, it would be a step up!

As usual, Dimitar, your understanding is agenda driven, and demonstratively faulty.
Charles Taze Russel was not speaking favorably about Satan …. He was speaking favorably about TRUTH.
Scanned copies of the first issue of the Watchtower are almost instantly available on the Internet. If memory serves, the article title is “What Is Truth?”.
As usual, you gave your disassociative diatribe BEFORE you read the article, and as usual were wrong and blusterous.
You could at least TRY to be funny. Occasionally that in itself is  inadvertently funny.
If sad and pathetic is what you were looking for ….. you NAILED it!