Pudgy

JW members (the vast majority of them) are lost in their illusions they have accepted from WTJWorg. Because they consider all the people around them, who are not JWs, “enemies” and only themselves the only righteous and honest people, who are, as they say, the only true worshipers of God, it brings them into one of the most dangerous situations one can find oneself; proclamation of self-righteousness.

And I also happen to know that, growing up, his family did Chinese fire drills but neglected to do actual fire drills, thus putting lives in danger!

This is exactly the kind of issue juggling I mentioned earlier. It keeps people from even taking the time to look at the details of any one single issue, because it's too easy to say, in effect: "Oh, you think I should look at the evidence about Taiwan? I don't have to. Just look at the Hong Kong issue." If the issue was Hong Kong, the same persons can say: "Oh, you think I should look at the evidence about Hong Kong? I don't have to. Just look at the Taiwan issue."

Point by point rebuttal:
1.) I think I AM funny ... it's just that dog humor is often unappreciated by youth.  ( Most times, my jokes are just for me, anyway ...)
2.) Who cares who Dmitar really is, or his predecessors? A matter of momentary casual curiosity, forgotten in any other context.
3.) Referring to item No. 2, some people will downvote everything, completely irregardless of value, to TRY and be relevant ... without any success whatsoever.
4.) It's just you.
     ...... well, except that Joe Biden and his bat-crap crazy associates are successfully destroying civilization.
 

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/when-herbivores-arent-poor-chicken-got-eaten-cow-180951115/#:~:text=Lal the cow’s behaviour might be motivated by,of behaviour that we’re only beginning to document.
Do cows ever eat meat? Herbivores eat plants and carnivores eat meat, and then there are a few oddball omnivores that eat both. Cows are probably the best-known ruminants (and have been witnessed eating birds). Yet even animals from this highly plant-specialized group will eat meat when given the chance.
The answer you seem to draw your remark from is with the word accidental. This just means, as you imply, low IQ when it comes to not understanding a simple question. However, I noticed you draw your strength from being rude and obnoxious. Is this a Jehovah Witness trait? Or have you recently be removed from that organization you adamantly disparage to a point, you don't care what people think of your organization. Is this your intent?

Scriptures have their advantages, but they also have their disadvantages. It is not a book on natural sciences, geology, biology, zoology, etc. For many of the things we are discussing we will never find a biblical quote. Or do you think it's possible?
If possible, then let’s say, who in this JW Open Club can quote some biblical passage that supports the thesis of JW Christians that blood components and fractions are that what they are not, or that they are not what they are? 
Many have a problem with WTJWorg, not just me. Loyal members have a bigger problem, because they are inside and I am outside :)) The fact that we are in the JW Open Club and that we are developing various discussions under this platform shows that you are not quite right in that assessment.
 

According to the WTJWorg interpretation, Adam and Eve along with their descendants lived long after their expulsion from Paradise. So they did not die the day they sinned. Various ideas about how long a biblical "day" lasts add to the confusion. We might speculate that their long life is a legacy of the remaining traces of “perfection”.
WTJWorg’s next idea is that Adam and Eve were aware of each of their actions. If so, then at the time of creation they already knew what to eat and what not. Or do you think that by being expelled from Paradise they became demented and forgot what could be eaten.  
It is difficult to understand God, especially after so many interpretations of him generated by religious leaders.  
 

What Lassie?
Timmy fell into the well AGAIN ... and you want me to get a rope and come with you?
Sigh ... why don't we just fill in the well and be done with it?
Be sure to get Timmy out first?

Why would ANYONE choose a dog?
.... because Gog of Magog probably has something to do with cats?

I can do better than THAT!
Being a Cartoon Carnivore I can authoritatively state as an expert that Cartoon Herbivores such as artists' renditions of Cartoon Rabbits, that they can be caught in an elevated upside down box trap baited with a photograph of a carrot.
...... moral of the story is this:
.... silly questions may be legitimately answered with silly answers.

The Catholics disavowed the _ews?
 

Coprolite
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   (Redirected from Corprolite)     Jump to navigation Jump to search For fossilized feces in archaeological contexts, see Paleofeces. Part of a series on Paleontology   Fossils   Natural history   Organs and processes   Evolution of various taxa   Evolution   History of paleontology   Branches of paleontology Paleontology Portal
Category v t e   A large coprolite of a carnivorous dinosaur found in Harding County, South Dakota, USA. Photo courtesy of the Poozeum   A large Miocene coprolite from South Carolina, USA.   A large coprolite (fossilized feces) from South Carolina, USA.   Age: White River Oligocene; Location: Northwest Nebraska; Dimensions: Varies (25 mm X 20 mm); Weight: 8-10 g; Features: Many small inclusions and one has a complete toe bone from a small deer called a leptomeryx. A coprolite (also known as a coprolith) is fossilized feces. Coprolites are classified as trace fossils as opposed to body fossils, as they give evidence for the animal's behaviour (in this case, diet) rather than morphology. The name is derived from the Greek words κόπρος (kopros, meaning "dung") and λίθος (lithos, meaning "stone"). They were first described by William Buckland in 1829. Prior to this they were known as "fossil fir cones" and "bezoar stones". They serve a valuable purpose in paleontology because they provide direct evidence of the predation and diet of extinct organisms.[1] Coprolites may range in size from a few millimetres to over 60 centimetres.
Coprolites, distinct from paleofeces, are fossilized animal dung. Like other fossils, coprolites have had much of their original composition replaced by mineral deposits such as silicates and calcium carbonates. Paleofeces, on the other hand, retain much of their original organic composition and can be reconstituted to determine their original chemical properties, though in practice the term coprolite is also used for ancient human faecal material in archaeological contexts.[2][3][4]
Contents
1 Initial discovery 2 Research value 3 Recognizing coprolites 4 Coprolite mining 5 See also 6 Notes 7 References Initial discovery
British fossil hunter Mary Anning noticed as early as 1824 that "bezoar stones" were often found in the abdominal region of ichthyosaur skeletons found in the Lias formation at Lyme Regis.[5] She also noted that if such stones were broken open they often contained fossilized fish bones and scales as well as sometimes bones from smaller ichthyosaurs. It was these observations by Anning that led the geologist William Buckland to propose in 1829 that the stones were fossilized feces and name them coprolites. Buckland also suspected that the spiral markings on the fossils indicated that ichthyosaurs had spiral ridges in their intestines similar to those of modern sharks, and that some of these coprolites were black with ink from swallowed belemnites.[6]
Research value
By examining coprolites, paleontologists are able to find information about the diet of the animal (if bones or other food remains are present), such as whether it was a herbivore or a carnivore, and the taphonomy of the coprolites, although the producer is rarely identified unambiguously,[7] especially with more ancient examples.[8] In some instances, knowledge about the anatomy of animal digestive tracts can be helpful in assigning a coprolite to the animal that produced it, one example being the finding that the Triassic dinosauriform Silesaurus may have been an insectivore, a suggestion which was based on the beak-like jaws of the animal and the high density of beetle remains found in associated coprolites.[9] Further, coprolites can be analyzed for certain minerals that are known to exist in trace amounts in certain species of plant that can still be detected millions of years later.[10]
Conclusion by Pudgy the 2d Cartoon Dog
Animals have been herbivores, Omnivores and Carnivores since the very beginning, BILLIONS of years ago, or at the very least, many hundreds of millions of years ago, and there is HARD evidence to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that this is true ....
UNLESS, of course your neurons are agenda driven programmed to the contrary, or you are as deliberately and willfully stupid as ...uh... Coprolite.

The Catholics disavowed the _ews?
 

BroRando is Billy!!?
That would make him Bro. Billy Rando?
I used to know a Bro. Billy Rando in Tallequah, Oklahoma.
Had one eye (I forget which) about an inch higher than the other,
His perspective on life was TOTALLY screwed up, in every way possible.
Same guy?
 

You are a strange one billy. But go careful how far you push as you might get d/fed from the forum again. 

…. As is usually the case, the book was much better than the movie.

In the interests of clarity, I can authoritatively tell you that all canine teeth were DESIGNED to eat meat ..... although I have been known to clean my teeth with an occasional raw carrot.

...you are thinking about history.
It is not news that the thief comes when not expected. You are in full expectation that it will come at an unknown time .... not that it is coming, or not coming at all.
On a related note, I have been thinking about using news of the "Brandon" administration as fuel for a FTL (Faster Than Light) starship engine, for as we all know .... nothing travels faster than bad news.
 

I have noticed over a long period of time a pronounced consistency about your posts, after noticing over a long period of time a pronounced consistency about your reactions to other peoples' posts.
Your posts almost always end by asking one or several questions based on false premises, and
Your reactions (almost exclusively down votes) are completely without a rational basis, and ignore the actual post, and are based on who is posting.
You are a very skilled diversionist and intimidator, governed by your agenda.  Excellent qualities and skill sets for a criminal defense attorney with a naive and unsophisticated jury.
I think, (assuming you are not already a lawyer) you missed your calling in life.
 
 

The American comedian W.C. Fields, on his death bed in the hospital, was observed reading the Bible just before he died, and was asked by a visitor about that, and his reply was " .... just looking for loopholes.".

The American comedian W.C. Fields, on his death bed in the hospital, was observed reading the Bible just before he died, and was asked by a visitor about that, and his reply was " .... just looking for loopholes.".

Maybe Jesus just wanted to give a lesson about shunning.

Be more concerned with reading the bible because this cleanses the entire soul. 

His statement is ridiculous. Well, didn't Jesus establish and open the way when he was on Earth? Plus, the challenge of being right and clean never ends.

You, with no understanding at all.
Animals were taken aboard the Ark by twos ... AND BY SEVENS.
During the voyage, some of THE SEVENs were allocated to serve as food for those collected by twos, and by sevens., and even by Noah's Family.
When the Ark landed, there were NO ANIMALS outside the Ark for Noah and his family to eat, so Jehovah gave Noah and his family to eat the surviving subsets of seven unclean animals ON THE ARK.
Mankind had been eating animals since they were thrown outside the garden of Eden ... or do you think Able was a shepherd and hunter because he needed a hobby?
THINK ABOUT IT!!
Why do you think God ordered the UNCLEAN animals collected by sevens, and the CLEAN animals collected ONLY by twos?
BECAUSE Refrigerators had not yet been invented.
When you read the biblical accounts, you are SUPPOSED to use some basic common sense, visualizing what is reasonable and what is a rubber-band stretch .... but as always ... agenda driven thinking ... parroting the screwball ideas one of the Society's Lawyers dreamed up in the 1930's and repeated for 80 years , short circuits rational thinking.