Pudgy

You have already been provided solid proof of what happened, and when.
 

..
 

What really bothers you? Former members or so-called "negative comments"?
And what do you think are "negative comments"? Are the "negative comments" something that is incorrect or is it what exposes religious hypocrisy?

..
 

..
 

Most jw's i know personaly watch fox news or news nation. I was in the house of a jw once who wanted to watch CNN, that was a twilight zone episode.

… and anticipating accusations of “racism”, I assure you I am not, as my three children are mixed race, by deliberate design.
…. and may I remind you that the Roman Centurion Army Officer Cornelius, sworn to the service of the RomanEmpire, was described as a man of exceptional faith inJesus, and as a man specifically approved by God.

…. reminds me of three negro elders at the congregation I attended were talking about politics after a meeting, and I walked up and mentioned to them some stupid thing Obama did, and one of the elders absolutely BLEW UP, that I would DARE speak despairingly of Barak Hussein Obama!! The instantaneous and intense defense truly surprised me.
I concluded he was a “closet democrat”, as     many JWs are, as I was disappointed to learn over time.
Very sad.  Very, very sad.
I had the Elders confront me en banc when they learned I was a registered Republican, and I replied that in Finland Jehovah’s Witnesses are allowed to vote without any congregational sanctions whatsoever, and I was merely going by the rules Jehovah’s Witnesses go by in Finland.
They were stunned and made no further inquiry, so I got up and left.
I suspect, and it is just a guess, Georgie that you too, are a negro “closet democrat”.
 It’ a stereotype for sure, but you do fit the stereotype on so many, many points.

You really should refrain from political subject discussions, Georgie.
It merely emphasizes your distorted agenda driven view of the Universe in every aspect of thought.
…. and that you are wrong.
What you have shown is that YOU have a highly visible political perspective, while trying to claim you don’t.
… and that you are wrong.
Therefore, I hereby declare April 4, 2024,  “George88Vicar of Warwick Closet Democrat Visibility Day”  !
 

3 reserved
 


The below proclamation quoted verbatim PROVES everything you said above IS A BALD FACED LIE.
(The "Transgender Day of Visibility" (TDOV) was started by transgender activist Rachel Crandall in 2009. NOT BARACK OBAMA. It was created to celebrate the transgender community and raise awareness about transgender rights and issues.)
 

Speaking of insights …. have you ever wondered why you have NEVER seen a picture of Ernest Borgnine and Elizabeth Taylor, in the same picture?

He is just trying to get more votes because he's loosing to Trump.

Everything you have just said, Georgie, is based on false premises, and personal delusion, and predilection for irrelevancy.
Do you even READ this stuff after you write it?
 

I also studied the truth book in 1969 and got babtised in 6 months. I was a 20 year old strong Catholic who had gone to Catholic school all through grade school & high school. I taught Catchism for several years. I had many questions for 8 years that no priest would even try to answer. I was about to give up when my husbands grandparents sent us the truth book along with a number of other ones. As soon as I read the truth book it was as if a light went on in my head. Every thing made perfect sense! All my questions were answered.

Over the years, I bought several hundred of these at only a nickel apiece. Placed them for 25 cents apiece. Every two placed was another gallon of gas for pioneering. Only have about 2 left.
I was baptized the year before it was released.
Since this came out in 1968 it pushed the 1975 date in a couple of places, as a time when the world would reach a peak of crises and catastrophes.  The book was updated in 1981 to get rid of the 1975 date.
This was an excellent style for studying. We didn't spend too long on any subject, and there were a lot of scriptures packed into the material that were just cited and not quoted. So a study could go long or short and still cover the material depending on the preference of the person we were studying with. Millions became Witnesses based on this book, especially former Catholics. But I think it had about equal appeal to people of many backgrounds.

I hate to say it, but I think of the TV series "Breaking Bad" every time I hear that song.
But I pioneered with a good friend during the years 1973-1976 when this book (1968 edition) reached its peak circulation. The brother was a Led Zeppelin fan, to the consternation of most of us who shared a car group with him. He always tried to convince people that their 1971 song "Stairway to Heaven" was written because someone from the group knew about the "Truth" book. The only words that partly fit were the following, assuming that the book was the "piper" and that "soon" there would be a "new day dawn" and there's still time to "change the road you're on" and get on the road that leads to eternal life, to paradise earth when "forests will echo with laughter."
Quite a stretch, imo, because I figured the song was completely unrelated to "truth."
And it's whispered that soon if we all call the tune
Then the piper will lead us to reason
And a new day will dawn for those who stand long
And the forests will echo with laughter
. . . 
Yes, there are two paths you can go by, but in the long run
There's still time to change the road you're on
 

This is what I was told when I was younger and I think about it every time I hear this song.....
".... peace and good, brotherhood...."
Agape
The Librarian

Everything you have just said, Georgie, is based on false premises, and personal delusion, and predilection for irrelevancy.
Do you even READ this stuff after you write it?
 

My observation refers to;
- court cases in which "tactics" of deliberate "deception" are applied that are unworthy of those who claim to be bearers of the Divine Light,
-some theological "nonsense" that GB produces as "errors", but many of which have very serious consequences,
- other theological moves as an attempt to justify and support what is "unbiblical teaching", but trying to maintain "reputation",
etc.

JWs members are media dependent on only one source and that is WTJWorg. This means that they are  subject to the influence of one (only) current opinion (read misinformation) that occurs within the WTJWorg Information Department (superior to them is the Ministry of Truth managed by the GB).
As for "fake news" or misinformation (and sometimes disinformation), WTJWorg is full of it. What to call all abandoned dogmas, changed theses and teachings? Simply. Misinformation! (.., and occasionally disinformation)

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
(… that really is pushing the limits of absurdity, but it’s  standard salutation …)
Please note that Georgie was challenged to PROVE his assertions …. or by default, prove that he himself was lying and deceitful by not being able to show where ex-witnesses or the Norwegian Government were deceitful.
NOT A SINGLE EXAMPLE.
That makes HIS status for credibility self evidently ZERO.

Posting three completely unrelated links about Covid and elections, etc. is only an attempt to be deceitful, assuming your audience is stupid, gullible, and easily hypnotized by many words.
It is EXACTLY the same thing as DELIBERATELY LYING.
It assumes Georgie thinks he is lying to idiots and fools, who will never catch him in his lies.

… if you cannot supply specific examples of ex-witnesses AND the Norwegian Government using deceptive practices, then it is YOU Georgie, who is using deceptive practices.
 

What deceptive practices?
Specifically?

What deceptive practices?
Specifically?

… if you cannot supply specific examples of ex-witnesses AND the Norwegian Government using deceptive practices, then it is YOU Georgie, who is using deceptive practices.