Pudgy

Because if you are in a forum discussing “all things about open water SCUBA diving”, the fact that one of the contributors is a farmer, and goes into a dissertation about hog management may safely be considered  extraneous fluff.
Unless the hogs SCUBA dive ….. and perhaps not even then.

when someone makes a point, instead of just “downvoting” it, which is silly … and when you downvote straight facts is both sad and ludicrous … why not reply with comprehensive counterpoints?
If you do not like what someone is saying, refute it with what you think should have been said.
Acting like a grumpy undervoltage A.I. sure makes you think you are scholarly and profound, but to everyone else except your doppelgänger shills it looks stupid.

What is holding you back from publishing the desired information? Is someone forbidding you? No commentators has anything against you posting news about Catholics, Mormons, Adventists, etc.

Good diversion, expertly done.
Also irrelevant what “other folks” do or don’t do.

Who should care what happens in the rest of "Babylon the Great"?
Clean things up in your house, then take care of your neighbors.
Just suggestion  
 
By the way, RNZ focus is not on WTJWorg only, as you can inform yourself on their web.

Good diversion, expertly done.
Also irrelevant what “other folks” do or don’t do.

The Yellow Fogball Rules Of Debate:
1. Participants must recite their arguments in iambic pentameter to enhance the elegance of discourse.
2. Every point made must be accompanied by interpretive dance to emphasize its gravity.
3. Rebuttal arguments must be delivered while wearing an oversized prop hat for added credibility.
4. Participants must incorporate at least one random word from the Klingon language to showcase linguistic prowess.
5. Points can be countered with the power of interpretive mime, as long as it's conducted in complete silence.
6. If a debater quotes Shakespeare, opponents must reply in rhyming couplets for the remainder of the debate.
7. The use of airhorn sound effects is permitted only during particularly compelling arguments.
8. A gong will be struck to signal the end of a participant's turn, creating an air of ritualistic finality.
9. A designated "metaphor meter" will gauge the complexity of metaphors used, awarding extra points for obscurity.
10. During the final statements, participants must whisper their conclusions to convey an air of introspective wisdom.
And most important,
11. It’s not permitted to put rocks in the fogballs.
 

It’s a joke, the book doesn’t really exist, and if you were anything but a humorless stain on the soul of humanity you would know that intuitively.
…. and yes, it is ad hominem, but it is not an attack,  merely an observation, and not a rebuttal to any debate statement you might have advanced.

So… you start.
You know …. you CAN BUY a yellow highlighter to check your own fantasies before you publish them.

The Yellow Fogball Rules Of Debate:
1. Participants must recite their arguments in iambic pentameter to enhance the elegance of discourse.
2. Every point made must be accompanied by interpretive dance to emphasize its gravity.
3. Rebuttal arguments must be delivered while wearing an oversized prop hat for added credibility.
4. Participants must incorporate at least one random word from the Klingon language to showcase linguistic prowess.
5. Points can be countered with the power of interpretive mime, as long as it's conducted in complete silence.
6. If a debater quotes Shakespeare, opponents must reply in rhyming couplets for the remainder of the debate.
7. The use of airhorn sound effects is permitted only during particularly compelling arguments.
8. A gong will be struck to signal the end of a participant's turn, creating an air of ritualistic finality.
9. A designated "metaphor meter" will gauge the complexity of metaphors used, awarding extra points for obscurity.
10. During the final statements, participants must whisper their conclusions to convey an air of introspective wisdom.
And most important,
11. It’s not permitted to put rocks in the fogballs.
 

Maybe he thinks yellow highlighters are for mak8ng snow yellow?

Everything I have stated is a historical, independently checkable hard fact.
Everything you have stated, Eric, is agenda based opinion.
That’s why you cannot defend it if you separate fact from opinion.
That’s why your bloviating rebuttals are only fogballs.
…. as close to nothing that can be.

Everything I have stated is a historical, independently checkable hard fact.
Everything you have stated, Eric, is agenda based opinion.
That’s why you cannot defend it if you separate fact from opinion.
That’s why your bloviating rebuttals are only fogballs.
…. as close to nothing that can be.

What happened Eric, dog ate your yellow marker?

Commentators, whoever “they” are, know what are hard facts and what is agenda driven opinion.  
If not immediately clear THEY have a printer and a yellow highlighter to separate what is fact from what is fiction.
It is very easy to do, and painfully obvious.
That is why you will not do it.

Everything I have stated is a historical, independently checkable hard fact.
Everything you have stated, Eric, is agenda based opinion.
That’s why you cannot defend it if you separate fact from opinion.
That’s why your bloviating rebuttals are only fogballs.
…. as close to nothing that can be.

What happened Eric, dog ate your yellow marker?

Commentators, whoever “they” are, know what are hard facts and what is agenda driven opinion.  
If not immediately clear THEY have a printer and a yellow highlighter to separate what is fact from what is fiction.
It is very easy to do, and painfully obvious.
That is why you will not do it.

.The problem when asked to highlight irrelevant crap in your rebuttal ( no pun intended ….) is it may take a LOT of highlighters!

The reasoning presented here nicely shows that GB's claim that they are led by HS has nothing to do with reality, but is a fantasy of GB and JW members.
Thanks.

If you read the above post, line by line, and Word by Word, you will see the ambiguity and hopelessness of the argument that they’re overlapping generations as promoted by BROTHER Splaine.
What is actually stated does not support the argument at all.
It’s just smoke and mirrors to distract and confuse with bluster and massive “word fatigue” from reading all that buzz word crap. Most of it is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.
Want to prove it?
 Print it out and get a yellow highlighter and go through the post and highlight all the ambiguities and qualifying statements. 
Highlight the irrelevant, too.
Be a sport … actually do it.
Then post the rest as several sentences and bullet points … if that.
But the bottom line is … when it gets down to the nitty gritty, when all the extraneous crap is filtered out, where the rubber meets the road, the bird’s eye low down on this caper this issue is very, very straightfoward and extremely simple.
And it is this:
Jesus Christ DID NOT teach his Apostles about any “Overlapping Generations”.
It is a pathetic and transparent attempt to cover up failures of prophesy as interpreted badly by the Watchtower Bible an Tract Society.

If you have the ability to “connect the dots” … connect the above 16.

When because your thinking is agenda driven, you are incapable of “connecting the dots”  …. become incapable of admitting that there are dots.

it’s fascinating to observe those incapable of a rational rebuttal use ad hominim attacks, thinking that is a rational rebuttal.
It isn’t. 
It’s the first resort of the agenda driven incompetent, as they know they have NOTHING ELSE.

Whatzamatter?
Don’t have a printer and a yellow highlighter?
Other people do.

If you read the above post, line by line, and Word by Word, you will see the ambiguity and hopelessness of the argument that they’re overlapping generations as promoted by BROTHER Splaine.
What is actually stated does not support the argument at all.
It’s just smoke and mirrors to distract and confuse with bluster and massive “word fatigue” from reading all that buzz word crap. Most of it is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT.
Want to prove it?
 Print it out and get a yellow highlighter and go through the post and highlight all the ambiguities and qualifying statements. 
Highlight the irrelevant, too.
Be a sport … actually do it.
Then post the rest as several sentences and bullet points … if that.
But the bottom line is … when it gets down to the nitty gritty, when all the extraneous crap is filtered out, where the rubber meets the road, the bird’s eye low down on this caper this issue is very, very straightfoward and extremely simple.
And it is this:
Jesus Christ DID NOT teach his Apostles about any “Overlapping Generations”.
It is a pathetic and transparent attempt to cover up failures of prophesy as interpreted badly by the Watchtower Bible an Tract Society.

If you have the ability to “connect the dots” … connect the above 16.

Rather than the vague, meaningless “word salad”  that is worthy of a Kamala Harris, ET, and sounds very profound and scholarly…. but isn’t …. how about commenting specifically on the illustrations that illustrate the complete absurdity that what the Apostles understood from Jesus was OVERLAPPING generations?
Hmmmmmm?