Dmitar

I would say, how can we draw a parallel from the characters of Moses and Aaron. WTJWorg is considered the successor of all of God’s organizations that have emerged throughout history, to use their logic. Noah's Ark = God's Organization, Nation Israel = God's Organization, First Assembly = God's Organization, WTBTS = God's Organization.
However, each of the above had "Earth Representatives", so Moses would be the archetype of GB, and Aaron would be the representative of today's Helpers.
Both of today’s classes at WTJWorg feel that they are inspired (guided) by God and that their instructions should be followed without discussion.
As with Moses and Aaron, who made compromises to please the people, so today’s religious leaders are making changes in theology and practice. Sometimes they are a relief to the people, and sometimes an additional burden.
So, enough about the alleged "spirit guidance". Because the comment provided by Thinking proves this setting or thesis.
Like other leaders of the people, GB and Helpers = Administration, monitor the beats and pulse of their people. When the pressure in the “body” of the assembly becomes too high something must be done. In other words, there are changes in interpretations. You who are permanent members of the JW Assembly are better informed about the new changes, bigger and smaller. Sometimes they have to come because of changes in the “outside world,” and most come because of internal events.
It is unfortunate that you, JW members, who see the reality within WTJWorg, are still trying to defend what is indefensible. Because if a certain theology still lives in WTJWorg, and you are willing to support and defend it, how will you feel when it is changed, and you knew something was wrong?
Some of you are already resisting the "nonsense" that comes from GB, while at the same time you are watching some of your spiritual brothers and sisters stumble under the burden of theology that you are aware has failed. ............. Don't you feel sad? Don't you want to help them not be afraid of man?

Can you expand on your thought here. What you people? Certainly, no one here has a clear understanding. 
Since it's reasonably clear, you do so here, can you explain your attitude?
You can speak for yourself. I don't believe including others in your doomsday outcome is legitimate for anyone else. However, I will agree, no one here is certainly not better than your kind of fellow man. Your kind is intuitive as quarrelsome, rude and obnoxious, unless you can quote that behavior through scripture, as to why one should as a Christian. 
The other would be, your view of spiritual leaders. Why would anyone follow a person's, personal assumption, that would lead the aggressor into more darkness?

Can you explain how that can be, since that individual just stated I don't get along with anyone here? What part of that comment sways your argument.

When you accuse an organization about being one without proof; other than individuals acting on their own corrupt lust, is no proof that organization is consumed by that fault. Yet, you want proof of a person that is on probation for that same corrupt lust. Your demeanor is inconsistent with your personal lust for vengeance. You stated, you have officially denounced your association with that organization. Move on to a better pastor.
You contradict yourself too much here be arguing with the same people, and then you agree with the same people. What does that say by defending the same people?
The presumption comes from you. That seems to bother you.
Yet, you have no clear understanding in the interpretation or linguistics of it, worth making a distinctive argument about it.
As do you by your support of an individual here. Your argument has lost its value. That's means you are no better than the GB and that organization you disparage. Look first in the mirror before you attempt to cast out the demons of others.

Can you explain with rational why should I, here? What benefit would I receive to have an association here? I don't find being corrupted by individuals here a plus, do you?

nYAH nYAH NYAH NYAH!
So Dmitar ... you don't get along with ANYBODY!
Is that THEIR fault?
"... methinks he doth protest too much ..." - Shakespear
 

Can you explain how, when it's clear, you show yours at every turn of your uneducated mission? You think your mission has value when you yourself have condemned yourself before God, and you proudly wrote about it. Have you stopped to think, your actions are an affront to God?
You speak of Greek language when you don't have the knowledge of it. This is another indicator of what you show. It seems you're more comfortable being rude and obnoxious and yet you identify yourself as a Christian like these poor souls here.
The other thing that lingers is what you commented on with @TrueTomHarley post about he and James, like each other. Then you comment you have not heard about the evidence. More conjecture and it's clear of what more it shows; what you are willing to accept, and what your foolish thoughts are about. Now, that's your choice, don't make it someone else's. 

@PudgyMuch of what you post is irrelevant, with a false premise, and is driven by a clueless agenda that comes from a meaningless individual. People think too much of themselves here. This is why God made man, to tame animals. 
However, just like @Patiently waiting for Truth, @Srecko Sostar, @xero, being a rabid dog should be a concern for individuals that think rabies is just a joke.

When you make an assumption without thought, then your word should follow with the word "possibility" in front of other people as though the evening meal was something more than a "presentation" that should be observed until Christ return in his memory and God's promise. Why would it matter if the apostles continued that presentation? Why would it matter, if Christ followers continue that now?
The word "rigid" should be used with your idea of that religious teaching and presentation. That makes your commentary, as your own word under quotation marks, indicates. That makes your response rude and obnoxious as anyone else with poor manners here. Therefore, your ideology and remarks are presented under a false tongue, since you are saying it.
How does that argument go against your perceived bible interpretation?

Isn't that what you did? You seem convinced, your input is the only one that should matter here. Why not stick to scripture or none at all. Don't use scripture to convince yourself you're in a mission, when its clear, vengeance is the only thing you seek. 

Reading Tom's or Pudgy's replies to noise makers is like watching a movie w/all the really crappy parts cut out when you've got the noise makers on mute.

PERFECT!
Perfect example of what I am talking about Dmitar.
Warning people to be afraid of rabies in a a two dimensional cartoon Dog ..... in all seriousness.
This is where a less calm person would be screaming obscene vulgarities about the utter insanity of your ....whatever it is.
Me, I am just going to drink some cartoon dog water out of my cartoon dog dish, and go into the next panel, and bite Garfield the Cat.
 

When you make an assumption without thought, then your word should follow with the word "possibility" in front of other people as though the evening meal was something more than a "presentation" that should be observed until Christ return in his memory and God's promise. Why would it matter if the apostles continued that presentation? Why would it matter, if Christ followers continue that now?
The word "rigid" should be used with your idea of that religious teaching and presentation. That makes your commentary, as your own word under quotation marks, indicates. That makes your response rude and obnoxious as anyone else with poor manners here. Therefore, your ideology and remarks are presented under a false tongue, since you are saying it.
How does that argument go against your perceived bible interpretation?

@PudgyMuch of what you post is irrelevant, with a false premise, and is driven by a clueless agenda that comes from a meaningless individual. People think too much of themselves here. This is why God made man, to tame animals. 
However, just like @Patiently waiting for Truth, @Srecko Sostar, @xero, being a rabid dog should be a concern for individuals that think rabies is just a joke.

I think between wondering who, who, who ...who wrote the Book Of Love, and the Cowboy Code, Volume 2, there is a paragraph in one of them that says that it is entirely permissable, yea, almost a requirement that rudeness and obnoxiousness be shown a person that continuously asks irrelevant questions, based on false premises and agenda driven cluelessness. 
... just sayin'.

I didn't know that I was 'associating with a known one'. I await your proof of this.
But be careful or you will be giving away your AKAs.  

How can you ask me such "stupid" question. TTH mentioned Jesus ’words in which he invites people around him to eat his body and drink his blood. I only expanded the possibility that the apostles and other followers repeated Jesus ’words in front of other people. If they were “rigid” in preaching such “religious teachings,” my conclusion was in the commentary. So I really don’t understand how you don’t understand the context within which my remark is.  

Can you explain if the Jews and Gentiles thought, it was a literal process? Can you give me a biblical text where the apostles turned into cannibals, for the sake of Jesus?

How can you. Do you need to be rude an obnoxious that you can't control your false tongue?

https://www.waheagle.com/story/2021/12/23/sheriffs-report/sheriffs-report-december-23-2021/20219.html
Sheriff's Report, December 23, 2021
December 14 — 12:02 p.m. A caller, concerned that a person in the Elochoman Valley area had been using drugs and was not himself, requested a welfare check. A deputy responded and reported that the individual did not appear to be under the influence of drugs. 2:40 p.m. A caller reported that someone was riding a dirt bike around Glengate without a helmet. A deputy responded and spoke to an individual who admitted he had been riding without a helmet. He said he wouldn’t do it again. 5:56 p.m. A caller said a woman in Cathlamet had been screaming at her daughter. She wanted the woman to leave her family alone. 6:40 p.m. A caller reported three suspicious men, including one man in a wheelchair, going door to door in Cathlamet. He later said they were Jehovah’s Witnesses. 8:22 p.m. A caller said she had lost her phone, and that the “Find

Ha Ha, I was just going to ask yo if you were so angry that you needed to post it 4 times  
That comment was funny however. 
I leave the sleeze to your JW org thanks. The place where Pedophiles roam free to harm young children.  

It only fails with BLIND JWs, because YOU want it to fail for YOU.
Truthful Christians would see the truth in what I've written and would see the sly way you try to hide truth about your Leaders and your Org. 
But what you seem to be saying is your Leaders and your Org are no better and no different to the rest of the 'world' that belongs to the Devil. 

Hey, are you sure you weren't a writer for the Mirror once? Or some other sleezy tabloid? I remember reading a big bold red headline once in a local paper, can't remember the name of it, but can't forget the headline: "woman raped by a head of cabbage". 
People actually buy those papers, and believe that stuff...
 

How can anyone be so obtuse? Of course I know what the subject is. What anyone else instantly realizes is being said is that the tactic fails anywhere—and it fails just as much with WT personnel as anywhere else.

You are the one playing the 'fool's game' by living in that Org that is run by 8 men that pretend to be the Faithful and Discreet Slave.  You are a slave to the ones you serve, and those ones are the Governing Body of the Org. 
For over 100 years the Leaders of that Org have deliberately told lies. The Watchtower writers, Leaders, helpers, then the JW set up, JW Org, all telling lies about what they pretended to know.  We don't need to write details here of the lies as it's all been written here before. BUT you and others blind yourselves deliberately from all those things. Things which have been proven, not just made up stories. 
You crafty way of writing only fools those who want to be fooled. For instance this sentence of yours above.
"It is a fool’s game to base judgments on the flaws of those taking the lead anywhere,...." 
We are not talking about ANYWHERE, we are talking about 8 men that say they are the Faithful and Discreet Slave.
We are talking about 8 men that say "God and Christ trust us, so all JWs should trust us" 
We are talking about a GB that have told the Anointed 'not to gather together because if they do gather together those Anointed ones would be working against the Holy Spirit.
This is who you follow. These are Your Leaders. Those wicked men who do not serve God through Christ but serve themselves and make slaves of you all.  How can i say that ?
Well for instance, on the ministry (when it was street work and carts) JWs didn't often go out with Bibles. JWs didn't often speak from their hearts. JWs handed out magazines and tracts. JWs stood by carts / trollies full of the GB's written words. It was all the GBs / helpers written words. It was not the Word of God... And so called Bible studies, were really a book study which might possibly include a very few scriptures. 
Remember that your JW Org is all based on the teachings which come from those ones you say 
"It is a fool’s game to base judgments on the flaws of those taking the lead anywhere,.
Because those taking the lead are the ones you follow.