Chioke Lin

I merely suggested if you wish to use the correction pronunciation in the Jewish language, it has always been YHVH, and Jesus is Y'shua. There is no call to get offended or to be offensive with your reply. 
In the English form, yes, YHWH and Jesus would be appropriate. I did not recommend the usage of Yahovah for the English language.
There is no need for hostilities commentator. As I mentioned above, there is no need for these kinds of distractions.
I had not down voted you before today. I see, that is your pattern of disapproval. So, I will use your method from this point on.

In my view I don't think you are as genuine as you pretend to be. You are possibly someone using more than one user name. But have a good day anyway.  
JWs taught YHWH from way back.  And the Watchtower had written in one of their reference books that God's name was probably Yahweh but they used Jehovah because it was more well known at the time. 
I am quite happy to use YHWH and to use Yeshua, as they seem correct and genuine. 
And even JWs on here have now admitted that it is not Jehovah but Yehovah.
So I will continue to be Patiently Waiting For Truth from the True Anointed ones, because only the True Anointed ones will be inspired of God's Holy Spirit and therefore know God's thoughts through Yeshua. 
Meanwhile people on here continue to pretend to know much more than others. I will not fall into that trap. I am not Anointed and I will not pretend to understand deep scripture. And if people think that i am foolish, then remember that it is the foolish ones that God uses. 
Berean Study Bible  1 Corinthians 1:27
But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong.

Rainbow colours, how sweet, but we know what those rainbow colours mean in this world don't we ? 
So its well suited to that particular Org. Have a nice day PC. 

A JW seems to be trying to prove something to himself here. It seems he is of such little faith that he needs these pictures to lean on. Maybe he sould learn that spiritual things are of much more importance than materal things. Remember it was the wicked Jewish religious leaders that requird a sign. 

those on the right side of the coming events will enjoy the clean humor of a rightous people
Yes i fully agree. The True Anointed will help True Christians to serve YHWH through Yeshua. 
The false Christians will be removed and organisations destroyed. 

Do prostittutes wear high heels ? I wouldn't know. Have a good day James. 

You quote me because you know I'm under 'warning' from @The Librarian and there fore I will not be led into your trap. 
but I do wonder if it was you that actually reported me   Have a most wonderful day Mr Carroll. 
I note that your comment is still quoting from MEN though. God's word is so much more reliable. 

BUT,
True Christians would NOT tell lies pretending to know when Armageddon is going to happen.
True Christians would NOT insult and degrade the True Anointed ones.
True Christians would NOT hide Pedophiles in their organization.
True Christians would NOT cast out Victims of Child Sexual Abuse, nor call those children liars.
True Christians would NOT allow people to become collateral damage within their Organization, just to keep the outside of that Org looking 'nice' and 'clean'.
In fact, True Christians wound NOT be Jehovah's Witnesses. 
 
 

Keep playing your game and keep pretending that you have superior knowlwdge. 
My love of YHWH and of Yeshua is known to whom it matters, and i will be judged on it. 
As for you, you too will be judged on the things you say and write. 
Be educated here :- 
The English term Jew originates in the Biblical Hebrew word Yehudi, meaning "from the Kingdom of Judah"
Or,
“Jew” and “Judean” are the English words most often used to translate the Greek term ioudaios
 
Ioudaikos   Ioudaismos The NAS New Testament Greek Lexicon  
Strong's Number: 2453 Browse Lexicon Original Word Word Origin ioudaioß from (2448) (in the sense of (2455) as a country) Transliterated Word TDNT Entry Ioudaios 3:356,372 Phonetic Spelling Parts of Speech ee-oo-dah'-yos Adjective Definition Jewish, belonging to the Jewish nation Jewish as respects to birth, origin, religion Have a good day, and may you have peace.
     

Dear readers. It would appear that there is as much deciet and lies told here on this forum as there is deciet and lies in that organisation run by the Watchtower, and that is a lot. 
Hence I will continue to wait for the True Anointed to be inspired of God's Holy Spirit through Yeshua. Only the True Anointed will be the spiritual Jew, and only True Christians will be guided by them. 
We can see here that even if people are sincere, if they are not of the True Anointed then they have no True understanding of God's word. Of course some scripture is very basic and a good guideline for living our daily life, but the deeper things of God are for those of the True Anointed only. 
May you all have peace, but also have patience, mercy and love. 

The correct form would then be YHVH and Y'shua, if anyone wishes to follow the ancient form. Even Yeshua is a modern Jewish form. If that's the case, then, Yehovah would be appropriate in Jewish form. If you use grammar correct for Yeshua, it will point you to the correct English change of Jeshua. The same English correction we get with Yehovah. 

 
In my view, I don't think, God's personal name should be a point of contention. 
 

Please! Please! Please! I'm enjoying this discussion. Can we keep it civil and without distractions?
 

A commentator has given the bible a discrepancy with what is written in Matt 5:43-58. The meaning behind our actions should reveal a good state of mind while being an imperfect creation. Jesus sacrifice gave man the opportunity to regain a state without sin before God. We as God's slaves are not without sin at the present time.
If we are as indicated by the commentator, there would have been no need for Jesus sacrifice, and God is apparently playing games with his creation. This changes the passage significantly.
Once again, this passage cannot be linked to the 1000-year reign of God’s kingdom.
The commentator also references Heb 4:12. I agree that God is the living word for his creation, We as his creation should understand there is nothing we do that can be hidden from God.
This passage cannot be linked to the 1000-year reign, either. But it does illustrate the sacrifice of Christ as our High Priest.
Matthew 4
15 For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who was tempted in every way that we are, yet was without sin. 16 Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need.
Once again, is God’s creation without sin in our present time?
So, the 1000-year reign is not of judgment but a state of reconciliation of a sort back to perfection. After the 1000 years, there will be a final judgment for God's creation that will include Satan and his followers.

A commentator concludes the earthly survivors should have no role in the development of the resurrected. This commentator, then, has to agree, there will be daily visits from the heavenly priesthood on earth, after those priests have been cleansed by the blood of the high priest, and will be perfect men among the imperfect. 
This seems out of focus on what the bible indicates. I will agree, we should not make the bible to be confusing or deceptive. The survivors do play an important role to the resurrected by their experience after Armageddon.
My apologies. I was knocked offline by a power surge for some reason.
My final thought, relates to the difference between, apostle, minister, priest, father, Elder, royal priest, preacher, etc.? Does everyone proclaim God's kingdom?
 
*** w95 11/15 p. 20 par. 21 Stay in the “City of Refuge” and Live! ***
21 Unintentional manslayers in the ancient cities of refuge had to be productive workers. Similarly, the anointed “sons of Israel” have set a fine example as harvest workers and Kingdom proclaimers. (Matthew 9:37, 38; Mark 13:10) As ‘alien residents’ and ‘settlers’ in today’s refuge city, Christians with earthly prospects are privileged to do this lifesaving work alongside anointed ones still on earth. And what rewarding work this is! Those working faithfully in the antitypical city of refuge will escape eternal death at the hands of the Avenger of blood. Instead, they will derive eternal benefits from his service as God’s great High Priest. Will you stay in the city of refuge and live forever?
 
 
*** w91 12/15 p. 12 pars. 15-16 Rejoice in the Kingdom Hope! ***
15 Concerning the great crowd, Revelation 7:17 says: “The Lamb . . . will shepherd them, and will guide them to fountains of waters of life. And God will wipe out every tear from their eyes.” Though this prophecy has a spiritual fulfillment now, the Armageddon survivors will see it literally fulfilled. How so? Well, what did Jesus do when he was on earth? He healed the maimed, made the lame walk, opened the ears of the deaf and the eyes of those blind, and he cured leprosy, paralysis, and “every sort of disease and every sort of infirmity.” (Matthew 9:35; 15:30, 31) Is that not what Christians today need? The great crowd will carry old-world disabilities and infirmities over into the new world. What do we expect the Lamb to do about that? The needs of the Armageddon survivors will be very different from the needs of those who will be resurrected. The resurrected ones will likely be recreated with whole, sound, healthy bodies, though not yet having human perfection. Because of the miracle of resurrection, they will evidently not thereafter need repair of any former disabilities by the miracle of healing. On the other hand, because of their unique experience of surviving Armageddon, miraculous repair is what many of the great crowd will need and will receive. Apparently, a major intent of Jesus’ healings was to portray for the encouragement of the great crowd the joyous prospect that they will not only survive but be healed thereafter.
16 Such miraculous healing will logically take place among Armageddon survivors relatively soon after Armageddon and well before the resurrection begins. (Isaiah 33:24; 35:5, 6; Revelation 21:4; compare Mark 5:25-29.) Then people will throw away eye glasses, canes, crutches, wheelchairs, dentures, hearing aids, and the like. What a cause for rejoicing! How well such early restorative action by Jesus comports with the role of the Armageddon survivors as the foundation of the new earth! Disabling maladies will be moved out of the way so that these survivors can move forward with zest, looking eagerly to the marvelous activity of the Millennium stretching ahead of them, not dragged down by the afflictions that the old world may have brought upon them. And all during the Millennium, they will be rejoicing in the hope of reaching the very fullness of perfect human life by the end of those thousand years.
 

Wow, I don't even remember reading such a thing in the Wt.  But I do know that the elders who "represent the royal priesthood" right now, are said to be the "princes" on the earth in the Kingdom.
This is the truth about where the anointed will rule with Jesus Christ; which is both in "heaven" - a spiritual state - and on the earth.  2 Cor 5:17
 
Said from a man who has created multiple identities on this forum, to hide who he really is.  
Why?

Allen, (yep, it's you) @BroRando has written many times about who comprise the Temple on the Body of Christ, as the anointed priests.  I am wondering why he isn't upholding his own belief.
1 Pet 2:5 - you yourselves, as living stones, are built up as a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood and to offer spiritual sacrifices that are acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.
Eph 2:20-22 - "because you have been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the cornerstone. 21 In him the whole building, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord, 22 in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling place of God in the Spirit."
Biblical history shows that only chosen priests have ever been approved by God to serve Him in His Temple.
2 Chron 23:6 - "But no one is to enter the house of the LORD except the priests and the ministering Levites; they may enter, for they are holy. And all the people are to keep the command of the LORD."
Num 18:7 - "But you and your sons with you are responsible for your priestly duties, for everything at the altar and within the curtain. And you must serve. I give you the priesthood as a gift for service, but the unauthorized person who approaches must be put to death.”
Many religions formulate the meaning of the spiritual temple built on the body of Jesus, as including all believers.  There was an initial reason for the priesthood, to teach all God's people His decrees for their benefit.  Mal 2:7  But, the Wt. is changing this truth into a lie, by saying the same as all religions, that the heavenly temple now comprises all JWs. 
It sounds like they want to be like the nations; and in a sense they are, by serving "wood and stone", an earthly organization.  Ezek 20:32
The anointed priests only, are the "saints"/chosen that Revelation 20:9 is referring to.
You can't change the message of the word of God, and get away with it.  🙂

Jesus the Chief Cornerstone is Jehovah's Faithful Witness. 
Revelation 1:5
and from Jesus Christ, “the Faithful Witness,” “the firstborn from the dead,” and “the Ruler of the kings of the earth.” To him who loves us and who set us free from our sins by means of his Own Blood—

Once again, I don’t believe the bible has discrepancies. I believe we are the ones that make those discrepancies manifest. A commentator used 1 Corinthians 3:16 as a point of reference. This particular passage refers, not only to the anointed, but to all those that become slaves of God.
Romans 6:16, Romans 8:9, 1 Corinthians 3:9, 1 Corinthians 3:17, 2 Corinthians 6:16.
This passage refers to a point in time when we all exist as humans. It would be inappropriate to use this passage to mean when the saints are ruling in heaven with Christ.
In my understanding, this passage cannot be linked to the 1000-year reign, mentioned in Revelation 20:7-8. So, I would avoid such a man-made discrepancy.
If autocorrect incorrectly places a comma where it shouldn’t be, I’m not the developer of this software.
If anyone has a better suggestion on a good English grammar software, please advise me, thanks.
I also find no need to discredit those that apply the bible correctly. I will accept BroRando’s explanation and the illustration of the commentator Peter Carrol. Thank you.

Sorry, BroRando.
I have become a distraction from your post. That wasn't my intention. You are doing a wonderful job explaining what the bible actually says. 

It only saddens me to know your apology was not sincere. I will take BroRando's advice and stay away from such insincere people that target others they disagree with, with animosity and suspicion. Sorry to have bothered you and the other commentator that carries the same unwillingness to help.

Sorry, I didn't mean to irritate you. I won't ask again. Thanks for being honest. 

Hello, commentor.
Why would others believe the 1000-year reign is symbolic even though the book of revelation speaks of it as it being literal? A time for humanity to experience perfection once again.
What does Gog of Magog, Satan's deceit have in connection while that 1000 years while it is happening? Isn't Satan supposed to be locked up, or is that deceit discussion, after his release? 
I don't want to directly ask, that commentor, there seems to be some animosity and suspicion, that's why I ask you. I don't wish to offend a fragile person.

Okay, thank you. You seem to be more civil and respectful than that other commentator that agreed with you. 

Once again, I don’t believe the bible has discrepancies. I believe we are the ones that make those discrepancies manifest. A commentator used 1 Corinthians 3:16 as a point of reference. This particular passage refers, not only to the anointed, but to all those that become slaves of God.
Romans 6:16, Romans 8:9, 1 Corinthians 3:9, 1 Corinthians 3:17, 2 Corinthians 6:16.
This passage refers to a point in time when we all exist as humans. It would be inappropriate to use this passage to mean when the saints are ruling in heaven with Christ.
In my understanding, this passage cannot be linked to the 1000-year reign, mentioned in Revelation 20:7-8. So, I would avoid such a man-made discrepancy.
If autocorrect incorrectly places a comma where it shouldn’t be, I’m not the developer of this software.
If anyone has a better suggestion on a good English grammar software, please advise me, thanks.
I also find no need to discredit those that apply the bible correctly. I will accept BroRando’s explanation and the illustration of the commentator Peter Carrol. Thank you.

Once again, I don’t believe the bible has discrepancies. I believe we are the ones that make those discrepancies manifest. A commentator used 1 Corinthians 3:16 as a point of reference. This particular passage refers, not only to the anointed, but to all those that become slaves of God.
Romans 6:16, Romans 8:9, 1 Corinthians 3:9, 1 Corinthians 3:17, 2 Corinthians 6:16.
This passage refers to a point in time when we all exist as humans. It would be inappropriate to use this passage to mean when the saints are ruling in heaven with Christ.
In my understanding, this passage cannot be linked to the 1000-year reign, mentioned in Revelation 20:7-8. So, I would avoid such a man-made discrepancy.
If autocorrect incorrectly places a comma where it shouldn’t be, I’m not the developer of this software.
If anyone has a better suggestion on a good English grammar software, please advise me, thanks.
I also find no need to discredit those that apply the bible correctly. I will accept BroRando’s explanation and the illustration of the commentator Peter Carrol. Thank you.