Errikos Tsiamis

If you were not a naturally evil person, you would have phrased that differently.

If Jesus did not have the ability to father a child, he would have been defective.

Based on the above, we can accept other possibilities of conclusion. The idea "that we have the capacity to become enemies of God" was realized by the very act of God's creation of angels and the first humans.
The possibility and capacity to be an enemy does not arise from the fact that someone is born/created perfect or imperfect, but from the fact that all of them have the freedom to decide that all of them  have free will, which they received from God. So, God is the cause of this possibility for someone to become his enemy. And what are we going to do now?
Free will exists only when we can realize it in reality. Before that it is just a fantasy of the mind. When can a baby realize, exercise its free will? 

Is this statement in any context? Be that as it may, it gives the message that GB members, who according to your own words and their own are imperfect, are ultimately enemies of God. So the enemies of God run WTJWorg?
 
Commentary through the question about materialized angels. Are their children, the Nephilim, evil because they were born of angelic fathers and earthly women? Or because they were not well raised by their parents?
If Jesus had children with an earthly woman, would his children be evil from birth, because he is of angelic origin as well (I say angelic because WTJWorg considers him to be the angel Michael)?

Perfect common sense rebuttal!
And the logic and reasoning is theologically sound, reasonable, and the logic is solid, Srecko Sostar.

Until the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, the United States faked “neutrality” toward the Nazis, and loudly proclaimed its “neutrality” about the war in Europe … while at the same time shipping enough supplies to England to “sink the Island”.
As a Conscientious Objector during the Vietnam War, it took me a long time to realize that being against war in general resonates and is in fact a political stance, and that NOT doing something IS POLITICAL AND BEING INVOLVED IN POLITICS.
That is REALITY.
The only time in the entire history of humanity that there was no politics was before Eve was created!

The process of self-condemnation should be more pronounced with WTJWorg GB persons and JWs as a whole. Self-condemnations for believing in the vanity of human teachings. Self-judgments due to constant circling around hypotheses and theology.

As always,Fausto, when you fail at proving your agenda driven revisionist historical points, you rely on trying to accuse “apostates”, attempting to divert your failure to prove your point or points with evidence … with ad hominem attacks.
As C. T. Russel correctly stated in the very first issue of the Watchtower, “If Satan himself tells you the Truth, it is still the truth…” (paraphrased).
HE ws considered to be the premiere “apostate” of his day.
So … the form you posted … where is the last page, the signature page?
And from when to when was this particular form used?
And WHEN AND WHERE DID YOU GET THAT FORM?
 

Responding to "public accusations", WTJWorg claims that it had to apply as an NGO for access to the UN Library. However, the UN document shows that you do not have to be an NGO to get a Library pass.
 

Watchtower komentira NGO status_ChairmansCommitteeletter 2001.docx

So, Fausto, why don’t YOU supply the “first letter”, and tell us what’s on it and on the basis of THAT LETTER, why the others “lack significant meaning” ?
Ontherwise your protest has NO meaning!

God’s will is laid out in the Bible, read in context.
Anything that PRESUMES to go beyond that is just for the money.
 

You astonish easily.
You should get out of the basement more.

A statement that the stupid find profound.
It is completely meaningless liberal snowflake drivel.
Ignorance is bliss … and your silly self evident statement is orgasmic.

Your absence of knowledge is very noticeable.

..

…. I am having trouble visualizing who you are talking to with this canned buzz word generated script.
 
 
 

When simple, straightfoward explanations are treated like secret military intelligence … “We would tell you, but we would have to kill you, hahahaha” is met with nervous laughter and whirlwinds of rumors. 
When cover stories have cover stories, and “New Light” causes history to be “revised”, who can you trust?
 

Pudgy is of course going to put me on equal footing with God, I can give him treats which with my dogs I am God since I feed them and show them affection and I am their sustainer of life. 
I remember the days when the Hoover vacume was all the rage....it would suck and suck and suck and suck, until the belt broke and it wouldn't suck any more until you sunk more money into it buying another over priced belt, then it would suck again and again and again, better then any other vacuum on the market.
Are you a Hoover vacuum salesman trying to suck every one into believing the governing body is the dust bag that holds all sucked up particles in place?

JW theologians...please provide their names and credentials.

“…. Meaning, apostates are correct while the faithful are mistaken.”?
“You extrapolate from your agenda driven fantasies things not written. 
That’s why “overlapping generations”makes sense to you.

….. well, it’s a good thing that what is being done here is debate, not a quarrel, although it is rather interesting that you spend as much time as you do here “debating“, exclusively with Apostates.
A point you seem to have missed is that if you disagree with what the Bible says and who God is, and the Christ, after having learned the Truth, you would be an apostate.   
if you agree with what the Bible says, and the truth about God in Christ, and disagree with current “new light” as advanced by the Governing Body, you would NOT be an apostate.
You would be a heretic.
…. there is a very real difference.
A person who is NOT a heretic, when he SHOULD  be … ignoring hard real world facts …. is an idol worshipper of the Governing Body.
Which brings up the question, “Who then is the real apostate?”

As Pogo once famously lamented, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”

Everything I have stated is a historical, independently checkable hard fact.
Everything you have stated, Eric, is agenda based opinion.
That’s why you cannot defend it if you separate fact from opinion.
That’s why your bloviating rebuttals are only fogballs.
…. as close to nothing that can be.