Jack Ryan
-
Posts
2,744 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
World Wiki
Events
Posts posted by Jack Ryan
-
-
-
-
They kept a database of doctors who do bloodless surgery/medical care. Under EU, that's not legal - in EU opinion.
- Srecko Sostar and Foreigner
-
1
-
1
-
Según la resolución de la Agencia de Protección de Datos, la información se usó para otros fines que los autorizados
La directora de la AEPD, Mar EspañaLa Agencia de Protección de Datos ha impuesto una multa de 10.000 euros a Testigos Cristianos de Jehová por recopilar datos de médicos y pacientes sin disponer de una autorización previa.
La institución religiosa tiene unos Comités de Enlace en los Hospitales (CEH) en cada provincia que realizan visitas a los hospitales para conocer el grado de colaboración del personal facultativo sanitario con arreglo a las creencias de los Testigos de Jehová, "que es únicamente realización de cirugías sin transfusiones", se recoge en la resolución de la Agencia a la que ha tenido acceso Redacción Médica.
A la hora de recopilar estos datos, según demuestra la resolución, los miembros de los Comités se extralimitaban de sus funciones, recabando información sin pedir el permiso pertinente que estipula la ley. Los Testigos de Jehová han presentado un recurso tras el fallo pero no ha sido aceptado.
En el documento se relatan como fundamentos de derechos la existencia de datos que han sido "almacenados y conservados, y suponen el tratamiento de datos sin consentimiento que se imputa, estimándose que forman parte de un fichero". Además, la resolución relata ciertas imprecisiones de miembros de los Comités: "Las manifestaciones del miembro del CEH de que la base de datos había sido destruida carecen de veracidad al comprobarse la pervivencia de los mismos, que a 2014 existían y en 2017 -cuando se hizo la inspección- siguen existiendo".
Sobre la alegación de la denunciada respecto a si los datos obtenidos de los facultativos que se encuentran en sus ficheros están o no incluidos en el ámbito de aplicación de la LOPD, la Agencia concisa que se trata de médicos "que prestan servicios en un hospital público, y se trata de datos históricamente procedentes de entrevistas personales y su disposición a colaborar con la denunciada. Las notas de colaborador/consultor se añaden al facultativo que consta en sus bases de datos, que no es un dato propio del médico sino una creación de la denunciada".
Según consta en la información a la que ha tenido acceso este medio, los datos recopilados en las bases de datos analizadas "no buscan contactar con la empresa/hospital sino que lo hacen con todas y cada una de las especialidades en las personas de sus médicos, integrantes de los ficheros, incluyendo varios facultativos dentro de la misma especialidad en algunos casos, apreciándose que en el origen y traspaso de los datos vienen de la labor de los CEH de los que se nutren los ficheros". Por tanto, argumenta la Agencia, "no se aprecia sino una relación directa con los facultativos, en modo alguno con el Hospital. No se puede calificar de datos incidentales cuando a los facultativos se les ha clasificado en colaboradores, consultores".
De este modo, añade la AEPD, "no puede considerarse que la inclusión de los datos del facultativo sea meramente accidental en relación con la finalidad que justifica el tratamiento, sino que es precisamente la identificación de cada uno de los profesionales de la Medicina el objeto de las bases de datos creadas y la finalidad que motiva su creación". Por tanto, "los facultativos cuyos datos se hayan en los ficheros de la denunciada deben considerarse incluidos en el ámbito de aplicación de la LOPD ya que el hecho de ser médico y ejercer la Medicina, en sí mismo, no supone el desarrollo de una actividad empresarial, máxime cuando dicha actividad médica se desarrolla en un hospital público perteneciente al Servicio de Salud de la CCAA de Cantabria en el que se presta servicio por cuenta ajena".
En definitiva, la Agencia considera que finalidad era "la confección de una base con datos de facultativos para conocer su postura en relación con la medicina sin sangre o disponibilidad a estas intervenciones. En cuanto a la alegación de que los datos de los médicos figuran en fuentes de acceso público, más en concreto en la página web del Hospital, se debe indicar que no es que consten solo los datos de los Médicos, sino que aparecen clasificados en carpetas, como colaborador o consultor, datos que no están en el Hospital". -
Here is the actual legal document of his declaration
-
-
-
-
-
It's better to HIDE it and take your chances than to end up a statistic:
-
it gets worse folks...
@James Thomas Rook Jr. might want to download this video LOL.... it won't last for long...
-
They are trying to steal the thunder from the Chinese.... literally hours before....
history repeating itself...
I think we are back in a space race...
-
Just want to point out that there were two criminals. One who mocked Jesus and the other who chastised the mocker. The criminal who chastised the other criminal asked Jesus to be remembered. Jesus' following words can be directed at the 'good' criminal or both, but that is ambiguous. That's to say its unclear if Jesus forgave the criminal who mocked him
-
For today's WT study w18 December par. 16
Before dying, one of them acknowledged that Jesus was a king and made the request: “Jesus, remember me when you get into your Kingdom.” (Luke 23:39-42) Your future is involved in Jesus’ reply, found at Luke 23:43. Some modern scholars give this word-for-word rendering: “Truly I say to you, today with me you will be in Paradise.”
If a criminal who deserves to die, and mocks Jesus to his face even during the crucifixion itself (read the whole passage), only has to profess he wants to be remembered by Jesus at the very last minute, then the whole purpose of needing to get people baptised and dedicated as JW's is rubbish.
This passage suggests belief in Jesus is enough and that even as late as your dying breath you can be redeemed! So works are not what saves you, being baptised is not what saves you, being identified with a certain church is not what saves you. Belief and faith in Jesus is what saves you and even mocking Jesus can't kill you if you have a last minute change of heart.
Reading this properly has serious consequences for the validity of WT theology, and I always had trouble with this passage when I was in as I couldn't understand why we had so much pressure to go door to door as much as possible and strong arm people in bible studies. The passage suggests Jesus only required we spread the good news so they could believe and not fanatical pestering of people to beome part of a fundamentalist religion.
- Srecko Sostar and Shiwiii
-
2
-
Reminder: This topic is about ATTEMPTED SUICIDE. If you want to comment on SUICIDES COMPLETED please see the link in my post above.
-
Jehovah's WItnesses = Sinners judging sinners for sinning differently. (Sometimes the sin is just getting caught)
-
@Randy Lee Manning There is no better religion. Stay one of JW publicly.
Just realize you will never live up to the standards the elders are professing to live by.
The secret to being a successful, "happy" JW is all in appearances.
See for example how your local elders (once they reach high positions) are able to stay in power:
All religion is show in the end. The secret is being a good actor:
Above all... remember....
DON"T GET CAUGHT!!! And by all means don't be so stupidly sheepish so as to confess and give them power over you to ruin your life
Everyone can now relax and go back to wanking off to your porn and feeling guilty at your next elder's meeting.
😀
I personally would also add that the current elders should think about this before deciding to disfellowship the next sinner sitting in front of them. The two other elders on both sides of you probably spent last with a hooker and just aren't talking. (or haven't got CAUGHT!)
-
So the real answer is then.... similar to how sinning elders stay in power....
the key to "The Best Life Ever" is DON"T GET CAUGHT!!!
Even in suicide....
you'd better be successful at your attempt OR you will be disfellowshipped by the Elder's who will then tell all other JW"s they are not allowed to even pray for you anymore.
once disfellowshipped there is no future resurrection hope for you
-
So the answer is MAYBE... unless the Watchtower elders are able to disfellowship them first for attempted suicide. Because "what is sealed on earth, will be sealed in heaven"... for more on JW's and ATTEMPTED SUICIDE:
-
It looks like I repeated myself:
-
And if they can conceal a sin long enough they can still judge other's repentance while staying in their positions!
Sort of like Senators who can make laws that don't pertain to them as long as they can keep them concealed!
-
I didn't see your previous post before posting the following thread:
-
Dear brother Judas Iscariot,
Your assignment as Apostle will be maintained due to Jehovah's new light (Pr 4:18). You had been serving faithfully for many years and there's a lot of evidence of God's blessing your life.
Please, be sure to deposit the 30 pieces of silver to the worldwide work as proof of your repentance.
Please accept our christian love,
Kenneth E. Cook, Jr. Samuel Frederick Herd Geoffrey William Jackson Mark Stephen Lett Gerrit Lösch Anthony Morris III D. Mark Sanderson David H. Splane -
The governing body believes the following to be true:
-
Three months later = dfd; six years later = no problem
-
Someone might say "I'm glad I waited to tell on myself"
-
Confessing is optional, he might just get busted and still be in the clear.
-
"Serving faithfully" can include covering over serious sin for years
-
God blesses those that are covering over serious sin
-
The congregation can telepathically detect secret sins and will not respect you.
-
Former U.S. Cardinal McCarrick defrocked for sex crimes || He was found guilty of sexual crimes against minors and adults.
in Topics
Posted
Former U.S. Cardinal Theodore McCarrick has been expelled from the Roman Catholic priesthood after he was found guilty of sexual crimes against minors and adults, the Vatican said on Saturday.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-abuse-mccarrick/former-us-cardinal-mccarrick-defrocked-for-sex-crimes-idUSKCN1Q508L