Jump to content
The World News Media

James Thomas Rook Jr.

Member
  • Posts

    6,689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    153

Posts posted by James Thomas Rook Jr.

  1. 1 hour ago, JW Insider said:
    3 hours ago, BillyTheKid46 said:

    That red liquid is technically referred to as cow bovine, not blood.

    No. The red liquid is not technically referred to as cow bovine. It is bovine in the same way that a cow's hide is bovine, or a baseball glove is bovine, or a leather chair, or a kind of saliva, or a certain type of sound, or a kind of meat, or a specific kind of hoofprint in the mud, or a certain kind of "mudpie"/"patty"/"buffalo chip"/etc.

    In other words, the milk I drank this morning was bovine, but it did not contain any bovine. The meat I ate last week was bovine, but it did not contain any bovine. There is no such phrase as "cow bovine" as far as I know. 

    JW INSIDER IS EXACTLY CORRECT !

     

  2. On 10/21/2018 at 7:40 PM, Nicole said:

    There are strong rumors that this caravana is being financed by Sandinistas (Daniel Ortega-Rosario Murillo and their supporters, followers) to deviate attention to what is happening in Nicaragua as OAS is focused on it, and to desestabilize the region, as a revenge towards USA 

    What is the difference between a strong rumor, a regular rumor, and a weak rumor?

    I never repeat rumors ... so LISTEN CAREFULLY THE FIRST TIME!

     

  3. Just as serious as whether or not you are going to violate the Scriptural Admonition of "Abstain from blood" ... is the serious problem of semantics ... how words are put together to either reflect existing thinking .. or to try an influence other's thinking.

    Are JWs allowed to get Platelet-rich plasma?

    That QUESTION scares the hell out of me, as I know how insidious the "environment" has become that generated it.

    Allowed by WHO?

    God's admonition against his declared personal property, for which he is jealous and possessive, stated "blood" is not to be used except for two things .... sacrifice to God, as was done in ancient Israel, and pouring it out onto the ground, after slaughtering an animal for food or resources needed by humans, which was an acceptable way of "returning the blood to God".

    The ONLY reason blood fractions are allowed (ALLOWED!!) by the Governing Body is for better public relations spin, and to try for plausible deniability in today's cultures Earth wide so when sued, they will NOT LOSE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF MONEY.

    They had it right the first time .... but were overwhelmed by greed.

    How to have it BOTH ways    .jpg

  4. On 9/10/2016 at 12:47 PM, Nicole said:

    I made a donation on line at JW.ORG. Why are they using a Switzerland banking address?

    Nothing at all suspicious about that.

    Swiss banks then transfer the funds to the Cayman Islands, then the Captain Nemo Vulcania Offshore Treasury Banking System, Northeast of the American Samoan Islands in the Pacific Ocean, and then to the final recipients in the exclusive gated community of Colony Park, New York.

    Nothing at all suspicious.

    Completely normal.

    Nothing to see here.

    Move along.

  5. For YEARS I have been vigorously and persistently telling people that when they make a contribution ... even if it's only $20 ... to the B.L.F.M, that they are making the world a happier place, in a small way alleviating world hunger, and honoring God in an indirect way.

    After 35 years, I find this still to be true, and encourage all to donate what you can, and donate often! ... either at home, or at the office or place of work.

    You will be making the World a better place!

  6. 1 hour ago, JOHN BUTLER said:

    I think you are getting confused with John the Baptist who are locusts. 

    However you may see the reason for my comment if you look on other topics, and i did say IF it is true.  

    If you have an early Sunday Morning meeting, you know that you have to race away from the Kingdom Hall as soon as possible to get to the Golden Corral before the Baptists show up like a plague of locusts!

  7. BillyTheKid46:

    I presume that even with your pseudonym and avatar, you are not an infamous pistolero.

    Your sentence structure, cadence and the way you put ideas together has a certain style and flavor.

    May I be so presumptuous to ask what you do for a living ?

    Where you work ? (generally .. not specifically..)

    Never fear ... I do not think if you did tell me, it would supply enough information to target North Korean missiles to your home.

    Merely a courtesy to someone who is trying to understand you better.

  8. 2 hours ago, Judith Sweeney said:

    Just speaking for myself....on this Slanderous Topic....

    I think you used the wrong word here .... the topic is not slanderous .... and if any accusations made are true, that is the perfect defense to the CHARGE of slander.

    There are topics that are "sensitive", even "taboo" ... but that varies from culture to culture, and from time to time..... and from person to person.

     

  9. "STUFF HAPPENS"

    Less stuff happens to those with a reputation for killing people that wrong them.

    "Loving counsel" does not work nearly as well as fear of being duct taped to a chair, having your kneecaps and fingernails removed, or being neutered,  with Vise-Grip pliers.

    ViseGrip-12LC-2T.jpg

  10. 2 minutes ago, Witness said:

    Dear Billy.  I believe your answer is just as confusing as the WT’s.   Here is the info you wanted:  Pages 712-726, paragraph 29 

    Glancing briefly at how MUCH followed ... that's where my eyes glazed over and I faded out.

    I suppose you had something important to say, but if I am going to read THAT much, it will be a Patrick O'Brian novel.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.