Arauna

Your answers give that impression. So for once in recent history  I agree with JWI

It's immaterial to me that you're an apostate from Mommy Watchtower. But you know it, and everyone else knows it.
I've never seen such gross hypocrisy from any JW before!

You yourself said give to god what god requires..... but it seems that Caesar is more important to you because if Caesar requests you to disobey the law of god then you seem as though this carries more weight with you. 
Any case, it is discrimination if you target one group of people because of their religion. The government also has responsibility to uphold their own laws.  When Paul asked to go to Caesar - the governor did not decide  what he thinks is more important. No, he acted with fairness and saved Paul from the Pharisees by sending him to Caesar.
It is therefore not wrong to question if authorities are fulfilling the law accurately or being too lax on some people or too strict on others.

Whoa! It’s like hearing that the king of the north is now Bolivia!

Your answers give that impression. So for once in recent history  I agree with JWI

Look, moron: I just supplied you with some links that prove my point. You're no more my ally than you are a scientist.
LOL! Lame.
Look at the link I gave you, moron.
I don't care about your opinion.
Read my post, look at the links, and try to manage to understand, you moron.
Far from lame. You sound just like Republican senators excusing Trumpolini for inciting insurrection.
Meh. Just as lame as everything else you write.

Gasp!!
You don;t suppose Alan was that alien, do you? That would account for mankind’s inability to live together with civility on the planet.
Beats the pants off any evolution theory, methinks.

No..... you got it all wrong.... but I do not have the time now to explain.  I am on my way to bed it is late here in Albania

That sentence tells me you have NO understanding of the Nazi movement at all . LOL.  Hitler wanted anyone who did not agree with him or fight with him  -dead.  Hence if you did not go to war for the regime you deserved death...... not work on a beautiful rural farm in fresh air..... lol

Continuing the infantile comments.

Sounds like one of those independent alternative creatures one finds here on this forum.... 

Two nights ago a CBS News Special interrupted a perfectly fine program that I wanted to see. “Must be important,” I told myself. Instead, it was House politicians carrying the impeachment over to the Senate for their consideration, with much pomp and ceremony of being an ‘historical first,’ even though everyone knew it didn’t stand a chance of going anywhere. And it didn’t. They’re having wet dreams over there at CBS.
Rand Paul said Did anyone charge Bernie Sanders for inciting the shooting of that Congressman at the softball game? Did anyone charge Maxine Waters with inciting violence when she literally advised persons to confront Trump supporters? That was enough for an entirely predictable outcome to take place, leaving Alan de Fool shaking his head in dismay.

This doesn’t entirely make sense. If it is true, then the JW mentioned is an atypical outlier. The suit would certainly not have Branch support. The Witnesses overall consider alternative service laws a very good bargain and are appreciate of them. Typical of their responses is this:
https://www.jw.org/en/news/legal/by-region/taiwan/successful-alternative-service-conscientious-objectors/
As to individuals, I have never heard anyone speak against such laws. Instead, every instance I know of is people likewise appreciative of them and glad to cooperate. Like this Russian brother in the Heart and Soul broadcast: (It is one remark in a 30 minute program, probably not worth the time to search it out, but the program is worth streaming on its own merits.)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w3ct1659
The wording is odd: “The petitioner has been known as a believer of Jehovah's Witnesses, who was recognized by the Supreme Court as a conscientious objector last year.” Why the past tense? Probably he is ex-JW KickFace himself.

So gullible you are. A perfect illustration of confirmation bias combined with Dunning-Kruger ignorance.

Alan has already explained this, no doubt with many an insult. This was a trap that Poor Richard was led into, a trap that Alan himself would have been smart enough to avoid.
Well, you’re on to something there.

Just because that idiot thinks his wisdom is displayed by categorizing arguments and reasonings doesn’t mean that I have to. I don’t even know what arguments are “young earth” and what are not, nor to I care. It is like he is competing with The Librarian (that old hen), anal about her Dewey Decimal System. Me, I just try to deal with what makes sense.

Not to worry. Ever since Dawkins wussed out with the British atheist busses, with placards saying “There probably is no God”—the “probably” because he was jellified of the Truth in Advertising law—I have lost interest in him.
https://www.tomsheepandgoats.com/2009/10/atheists-buses-and-hellfire-buses.html
Yes. Of course.

I also have not yet made the comparison (for the sake of kindness, but kindness is utterly wasted of this fellow) that while he looks forward to his death, you and I awake looking forward to the day, in an atmosphere of overall joy. Maybe THAT is the ultimate assessment of what one’s beliefs do for a person.
He really really REALLY should have stayed where he was. He would have a more pleasant personality if he had.

The guy is a piece of work. Sometimes I fear his cherished evolution is true and that he is the final product. In that event, the end of all things will come far quicker than by any of the scenarios you have floated.

You are one strange bird to think that the purpose of life is to win or lose on a here today—gone tomorrow internet thread perhaps read by 20 people.

I lost nothing. I asked my mathematician friend, “What are the chances of life originating spontaneously?”
”Greater than that of all the atoms in the known universe,” he said.
I then followed up: “What are chances that Alan will leave his infantile personality behind and respond to disagreement like an adult?”
”Let’s take another look at that evolution question,” he said. “Maybe I was a little hasty,”

"the OLD guy"?     😉

Reminds me of the "goldilocks epochs" when there were no natural disasters for millions of years so that the "soup" was stable for the millions of mutations to lead to beneficial selections. Hitting the jackpot every time. 

I've already spit out my coffee a few times.
Arauna is a weird combination of ageing, obsolete JW and young-earth creationist. Even though Mommy Watchtower explicitly downgraded YECism as "unscriptural and unscientific" forty years ago, she's stuck in what she learned as a Watchtower drone sixty years ago. 

That is why I joke with you guys about your secular chronologies. The bible chronology is the best: 
Below is an excerpt of the biblical chronology as I copied it from the JW.org website. It puts the battle of carchemish at 625 BCE ..... same date as this "new propisal"...... lol.