-
Posts
4,702 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
103
Reputation Activity
-
Anna got a reaction from James Thomas Rook Jr. in Charles Taze Russell: Was he recently "canonized"?
That Dr. Jackson writes some flattering bios! At least Russell didn't write it himself. I am having to write my own bio and refer to myself in 3rd person, that's always awkward and weird....
-
Anna reacted to James Thomas Rook Jr. in ONLY JEHOVAH CAN SAVE THE TURTLES! ~ ????
DATELINE JANUARY 10. 2018
WASHINGTON—In an attempt to ensure the federal benefit program is not taken advantage of, a new regulation announced Tuesday will require all organisms facing extinction to actively search for a new habitat in order to receive funding for their protection under the Endangered Species Act. “Effective immediately, America’s at-risk species must prove they are making an effort to find a different ecosystem to live in if they wish to obtain government assistance for their continued survival,” said Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, adding that endangered creatures such as the black-footed ferret and Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep should not be allowed to just sit back and live on public lands at taxpayer expense unless they agree to take steps to better their own situations. “An ‘endangered’ status isn’t a free pass, and it’s important we put forth policies that encourage a culture of personal responsibility among our nation’s plants and animals. We’re not doing the star cactus or the salt marsh harvest mouse any favors when we allow them to live on the government’s dime, which can create a disincentive for them to secure a place in another habitat and become self-sufficient.” At press time, the Department of the Interior announced further regulations capping the amount of time a species can remain on the endangered list at six months.
The Onion News
-
Anna reacted to James Thomas Rook Jr. in ONLY JEHOVAH CAN SAVE THE TURTLES! ~ ????
When people cannot stand the cold ... they move to Florida ..... when they cannot stand the heat, they move to Vermont. Turtles do the exact same thing.
It messes up your study you are getting paid to do ... but turtles have been around for many hundreds of millions of years, and during the Carboniferous Period, it was a LOT hotter than anything we have today, etc. .... FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS.
I have seen beaches from an airplane where fish were stranded on the sand by the hundreds of millions .... mile after mile, after mile, rotting in the sun.
99% of all life that has EVER EXISTED on the Earth is now extinct.
..........................................................................................................................
STUFF HAPPENS
GET USED TO IT.
As the famous line in Jurassic Park, the Movie pointed out "Life finds a way".
and......
...sometimes it doesn't.
-
-
Anna got a reaction from Melinda Mills in Fading
It depends very much on circumstances, so there is no one correct answer. If you have been drifting slowly by not going out in field service first, and then slowly missing meetings until you stop all together, and then avoid any contact with the congregation elders and other witnesses it could be anything from one to 5 years....
-
Anna reacted to Melinda Mills in Fading
It also shows that little shepherding is done. The shepherd is supposed to use his crook to rescue those who fall into a precipice. Seems that they are even afraid of these people.
-
Anna got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?
No, don't look because this thread is about 607, not about chastising strangers on the internet. I think @TrueTomHarley meant that suggestion to be purely rhetorical. Plus I don't think Alan F gives two monkeys bottoms.
-
Anna got a reaction from Malum Intellectus in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?
No, don't look because this thread is about 607, not about chastising strangers on the internet. I think @TrueTomHarley meant that suggestion to be purely rhetorical. Plus I don't think Alan F gives two monkeys bottoms.
-
Anna got a reaction from JW Insider in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?
No, don't look because this thread is about 607, not about chastising strangers on the internet. I think @TrueTomHarley meant that suggestion to be purely rhetorical. Plus I don't think Alan F gives two monkeys bottoms.
-
Anna reacted to TrueTomHarley in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?
Nah. We'll find one when and if it becomes necessary. Probably he is mending his ill-mannered ways right now so as to fit in.
-
Anna reacted to TrueTomHarley in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?
Well - I don't think he pretends to be a brother.
-
Anna got a reaction from Queen Esther in COULD NORTH KOREA BE THE KING OF THE NORTH?
Hey! We can speculate all we like!
-
Anna got a reaction from James Thomas Rook Jr. in COULD NORTH KOREA BE THE KING OF THE NORTH?
Hey! We can speculate all we like!
-
-
Anna reacted to JW Insider in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
Have you tried finding a forum where both Witnesses and non-Witnesses gather to discuss Witness-related subjects? Perhaps you could mention it there.
-
Anna reacted to JW Insider in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
What if you took a stack of coupons for the book(s) and attached them to small pieces of gum, and then surreptitiously stuck them to the bottom of every chair in the hall, repeating this process in 100 or 200 Kingdom Halls in the next year? Over the following year, the gum would lose its gumminess (Mt 5:13?) and then your coupon would be picked up by hundreds of different people over time. It'd be like a silent book tour where most of your effort is spent chewing and sitting down, and shifting your seat more often than most.
-
Anna reacted to TrueTomHarley in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
I have only netted a couple hundred sales through that method. It sounds good, but the payoff is less than you might think.
-
Anna reacted to JayDubya in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
It’s okay.  Your comments made me think of myself and my own experiences.  I take it all in stride now.  Thanks for sharing!!!Â
... now my problem is makeup. Â LOLOLOLOL #itsgoodtolaugh
??
-
Anna got a reaction from JW Insider in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?
@Ann O'Maly tried clearing the cache, and cookies and rebooting. Still the same. This is the only website that's giving me trouble @The Librarian. with firefox. Started a couple of days ago...
Just tried this website in chrome, and there's no problem. I was able to type this on my lap top right now..
-
Anna got a reaction from JayDubya in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
And then there's Europe -ya American prunes! I mean prudesÂ
http://www.inspiredtraveller.in/places-in-the-world-where-public-nudity-is-legal/
It doesn't mention the UK, where nudity is also legal, (unless it causes distress to the viewer. Makes sense. I just love British laws, lol)
-
Anna reacted to JW Insider in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
To be fair, the original version of this hymn was written by Frances Ridley Havergal (1836-1879) and originally played with music by Henri Abraham Cesar Malan (1787-1864). The original version also included the words "Take my silver and my gold." In 1966, we were still singing this song at the Hall with the words: "Take my silver and my gold."
(Frances Havergal was the wife of an Anglican preacher [Church of England] and her brother was a priest in the Anglican church.)
Our penultimate version included "take my:" heart, mind, feet, hands, voice, life, myself. Our current version now includes "take my:" heart, voice, feet, hands, silver, gold, life, myself.
So we had to lose "my mind" and raise "my voice" to accommodate "my silver and my gold."
As you can see below, the original Anglican version (right) had "take my:" life, moments, days, hands, feet, voice, lips, silver, gold, mind(intellect), will, heart, love, and myself. The ones we still include are highlighted in red, so we are now at 9 of 14. Starting in 1905 (Hymns of the Millennial Dawn) we sang it almost exactly as it is in the original. The 1905 version (left) was the way Russellites sang it and was very much like other versions of the original as sung in other churches.
 1 Take my life and may it be
Lord, acceptable to thee;
Take my hands, and let them move
At the impulse of thy love. Â Take my life, and let it be
Consecrated, Lord, to Thee;
Take my moments and my days,
Let them flow in ceaseless praise,
Let them flow in ceaseless praise. 2 Take my feet and let them be
Swift on errands, Lord for thee;
Take my voice and let it bring
Honor always to my King.
  Take my hands, and let them move
At the impulse of Thy love;
Take my feet and let them be
Swift and beautiful for Thee,
Swift and beautiful for Thee. 3 Take my lips and let them be
Moved with messages from thee;
Take my silver and my gold;
Nothing, Lord, would I withhold.
  Take my voice, and let me sing
Always, only, for my King;
Take my lips, and let them be
Filled with messages from Thee,
Filled with messages from Thee. 4 Take my moments and my days;
Let them flow in constant praise;
Take my intellect and use
Ev'ry pow'r as thou shalt choose.
 Take my silver and my gold;
Not a mite would I withhold;
Take my intellect, and use
Every power as Thou shalt choose,
Every power as Thou shalt choose. 5 Take my will and make it thine;
It shall be no longer mine;
Take my heart, it is thine own;
Thus in me thyself enthrone. Â Â Take my will, and make it Thine;
It shall be no longer mine.
Take my heart; it is Thine own;
It shall be Thy royal throne,
It shall be Thy royal throne. 6 Take my love, my God; I pour
At thy feet its treasure store;
Take myself-- I wish to be
Ever, only, all for thee. Â Â Take my love; my Lord, I pour
At Thy feet its treasure-store.
Take myself, and I will be
Ever, only, all for Thee,
Ever, only, all for Thee. We began singing a very pretty, shortened version of this song a couple decades later. We changed the name from Consecration to Dedication in 1950, and this was the way we were singing it up until 1966 (pictured below) -- with "take my:" life, voice, feet, hands, mind[intellect], moments, silver, gold, heart, myself -- still managing to fit 10 out of 14 points from the original.
-
Anna reacted to James Thomas Rook Jr. in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?
I don't even know what "Grammerly" is.
I am of course going to look it up ....
I find it embarrassing not to know everything.
-
Anna reacted to TrueTomHarley in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
Well - not from the platform, I hope. Or, at least, not in public prayer.
-
Anna reacted to JW Insider in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
I can imagine a situation where it was a sister's fault that the entire songbook had to be updated again. And, although it's pure speculation, it wouldn't be the first time something like this happened. They say it was a sister who got celebrating anniversaries approved. They say it was a sister who got the idea of approving multiple blood fractions. Ultimately it was a sister (Audrey Mock) who got the rule changed at Bethel that if a brother got married, he had to leave Bethel.
In this case, imagine a brother as high up in the hierarchy as the Governing Body itself who has a wife. Now every time this wife sees her husband glancing for too long at a younger sister she knows she can't say anything directly, so she just starts humming the tune of: "O Guard Your Heart, you . . . " After all, these songs have become the playlist of our lives, and I must have a thousand triggers that immediately get me to start humming any one of a hundred different Kingdom Songs.
-
Anna got a reaction from Srecko Sostar in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.
I think you'd get on really well. At the mid week meeting last week I asked him what was so outstanding about Bathsheba. He said she was out, standing under the shower.