Jump to content
The World News Media

TrueTomHarley

Member
  • Posts

    8,273
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    417

Reputation Activity

  1. Confused
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Nah. We'll find one when and if it becomes necessary. Probably he is mending his ill-mannered ways right now so as to fit in.
  2. Sad
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    As I recall, there was also something about the composition of the driveway, too. It was not the ordinary blacktop. 
    and......the house number.....was........607!
    Take it, guys! I'm off this thread!
  3. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from James Thomas Rook Jr. in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    As I recall, there was also something about the composition of the driveway, too. It was not the ordinary blacktop. 
    and......the house number.....was........607!
    Take it, guys! I'm off this thread!
  4. Like
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Well - I don't think he pretends to be a brother.
  5. Upvote
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    See how insulting this fellow is. It will be his undoing, most likely.
    The fact that he worships the Dawkins-Harris-Hitchens Trinity makes it even more interesting.
    Quick, someone find me a scripture of how a contemptuous person comes to ruin.
  6. Like
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Free AS28! Free AS28! Free AS28!
    He has done his time. He is repentant. And he manfully fights a disability. @The Librarian- The Americans With Disabilities Act compels you to act.
    Come now - he is flawed, but the Assyrian is at the gates, taunting (boy, does he ever!) godly interests. The forces of theocracy needs him! - I am too dumb to weigh in. Few Witnesses are up on this stuff.
    At least give him time for his glorious 'stache to grow back, then set him between the very pillars of peer-reviewed excellence, so he can bring down their house upon them.
  7. Like
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    GASP! Not you, too??! It wasn't because you made light of anyone, was it? hehehehe :))))))
    yeah, Alan is a bit of a hothead at times - no one would dispute that. But when he is on, he is on, and his input is both unique and valuable.
    I can join he and Nana to form a WNM Trinity for the infamous thread I was put in charge of where I was apparently expected to play nice with apostates and declined to do it and so the whole thread disappeared.
    Having said this, and as much as I rib @The Librarian (the old hen), she has a tough job, I think does she the best she can.  I would vacate - as I did on one other site - if people here were as steadfastly nasty as they were there. She prevents that from happening, so if I have to take a shot now and again, I'll go along with her wishes until I can't - and I doubt that situation will arise.
    I think a lot of ones here are unstable, and a few are downright crazy. I do not exclude myself from this statement - I am not without issues. They must be cut some slack. But to carry on too much about rebukes given is to be the same as those who bitch endlessly about the GB. Somebody has to drive. She has earned her seat. It is not for me to change her, but to go elsewhere if we absolutely can't get along. That is why I try to get along.
  8. Upvote
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Arauna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Sorry. He is busy helping me today
    If those greater minds are as unrelentingly unpleasant, condescending and just plain nasty as this fellow was, you frankly must wonder just how great can they be. 
    Definitions of 'wisdom' differ. I think he would gag on the one James supplies at 3:17, to say nothing of Proverbs 11:2. 
     
  9. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Malum Intellectus in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    See how insulting this fellow is. It will be his undoing, most likely.
    The fact that he worships the Dawkins-Harris-Hitchens Trinity makes it even more interesting.
    Quick, someone find me a scripture of how a contemptuous person comes to ruin.
  10. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from JW Insider in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Nah. We'll find one when and if it becomes necessary. Probably he is mending his ill-mannered ways right now so as to fit in.
  11. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Anna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Nah. We'll find one when and if it becomes necessary. Probably he is mending his ill-mannered ways right now so as to fit in.
  12. Upvote
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Anna in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Well - I don't think he pretends to be a brother.
  13. Upvote
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Nana Fofana in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    See how insulting this fellow is. It will be his undoing, most likely.
    The fact that he worships the Dawkins-Harris-Hitchens Trinity makes it even more interesting.
    Quick, someone find me a scripture of how a contemptuous person comes to ruin.
  14. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Anna in COULD NORTH KOREA BE THE KING OF THE NORTH?   
    It's Bolivia.
  15. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from DespicableME in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Free AS28! Free AS28! Free AS28!
    He has done his time. He is repentant. And he manfully fights a disability. @The Librarian- The Americans With Disabilities Act compels you to act.
    Come now - he is flawed, but the Assyrian is at the gates, taunting (boy, does he ever!) godly interests. The forces of theocracy needs him! - I am too dumb to weigh in. Few Witnesses are up on this stuff.
    At least give him time for his glorious 'stache to grow back, then set him between the very pillars of peer-reviewed excellence, so he can bring down their house upon them.
  16. Like
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from AllenSmith in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Free AS28! Free AS28! Free AS28!
    He has done his time. He is repentant. And he manfully fights a disability. @The Librarian- The Americans With Disabilities Act compels you to act.
    Come now - he is flawed, but the Assyrian is at the gates, taunting (boy, does he ever!) godly interests. The forces of theocracy needs him! - I am too dumb to weigh in. Few Witnesses are up on this stuff.
    At least give him time for his glorious 'stache to grow back, then set him between the very pillars of peer-reviewed excellence, so he can bring down their house upon them.
  17. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from JW Insider in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.   
    Plus I have acquired 87 cavities.
  18. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Anna in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.   
    I have only netted a couple hundred sales through that method. It sounds good, but the payoff is less than you might think.
  19. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from JW Insider in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.   
    I have only netted a couple hundred sales through that method. It sounds good, but the payoff is less than you might think.
  20. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Anna in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.   
    Well - not from the platform, I hope. Or, at least, not in public prayer.
     
  21. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from AllenSmith in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    I haven't had the pleasure of meeting those two, yet.
  22. Like
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from Nana Fofana in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    GASP! Not you, too??! It wasn't because you made light of anyone, was it? hehehehe :))))))
    yeah, Alan is a bit of a hothead at times - no one would dispute that. But when he is on, he is on, and his input is both unique and valuable.
    I can join he and Nana to form a WNM Trinity for the infamous thread I was put in charge of where I was apparently expected to play nice with apostates and declined to do it and so the whole thread disappeared.
    Having said this, and as much as I rib @The Librarian (the old hen), she has a tough job, I think does she the best she can.  I would vacate - as I did on one other site - if people here were as steadfastly nasty as they were there. She prevents that from happening, so if I have to take a shot now and again, I'll go along with her wishes until I can't - and I doubt that situation will arise.
    I think a lot of ones here are unstable, and a few are downright crazy. I do not exclude myself from this statement - I am not without issues. They must be cut some slack. But to carry on too much about rebukes given is to be the same as those who bitch endlessly about the GB. Somebody has to drive. She has earned her seat. It is not for me to change her, but to go elsewhere if we absolutely can't get along. That is why I try to get along.
  23. Haha
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from AllenSmith in 607 B.C.E. - Is it Biblically Supported?   
    Don't worry about it, Alan. There are many more numbers. Why - they go all the way up to 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000!
    I actually thought the @The Librarian's explanation of your ban was also a veiled rebuke to me, for she was annoyed that I had unnecessarily drawn some blowhard into the thread so as to demolish his schpiel. I decided to lay low for awhile. One can be caught up too much into things.
  24. Like
    TrueTomHarley reacted to Anna in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.   
    I think you'd get on really well. At the mid week meeting last week I asked him what was so outstanding about Bathsheba. He said she was out, standing under the shower.
  25. Thanks
    TrueTomHarley got a reaction from JayDubya in Women must not instruct men, even by singing a theocratic song.   
    You were not the one I had in mind, and I frankly think we overdo it on personal neat-as-a-pin dress and grooming. But that is how it is with any group of people. Not everything goes your way and one simply must avoid being the bull in the china shop.
    At times in my life I have been a little bit 'out there' in terms of grooming, yet I have never once had anyone call it to my attention, and I have enjoyed a few priviledges.  You may like the following story: one such time my wife and I came to a packed assembly hall where a branch committee brother was the speaker. He gave a very hard-hitting talk - the blunt sort with observations that would not appear in print, and if he had adopted the same tone as to dress and grooming, he could have pointed to me as Exhibit A. I was well overdue for a haircut and whenever that happens I will run product through my hair and sweep it back once with my fingers - I get freebee haircuts from a relative but sometimes I must wait for him to fit me in and neither he nor I get around to it.
    Because we arrived down to the wire, if not slightly over it, the attendants put us in one of the few seats available - up front and directly in front of the branch brother. I didn't particularly want to speak with him - I am not one of those who goes for selfies with the speaker - but after prayer I turned about and I was face to face with him. So I said some genuine pleasantry, thanking him for coming and such, and he said "I wasn't too hard on you folks, was I?"
    "We'll adjust," I told him.
    You are a better person than I am.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.