TrueTomHarley

That old hen.
hehehe :)))))
You’re joking! She’d rather be dead forever?

That old hen.
hehehe :)))))
You’re joking! She’d rather be dead forever?

That old hen.
hehehe :)))))
You’re joking! She’d rather be dead forever?

Only ‘dodo.’ And only when it is appropriate. Which, admittedly, occurs frequently.

I don’t hate you. I consider you a dodo. There’s a difference. 

Only ‘dodo.’ And only when it is appropriate. Which, admittedly, occurs frequently.

The phrase you are looking for is: ‘a lie.’
Headline of your story reads: “Coroner blasts Jehovah’s Witnesses for not stopping....”
Whereupon the coroner himself, who has other things to do but is annoyed at being misrepresented, must set the record straight:
“We would like to state that at no time did the Coroner find that opportunities existed and/or were missed by any individual or group to prevent the murder.”
One might even say the phrase you are looking for is: “an apostate lie.” Who else would turn the Coroner’s statement inside out?

Furthermore, since the coroner has since made clear that no way did any other party (JW or otherwise) fail to pick up on signals, this next statement of the story must be completely made up:
”And Mr McGovern warned that similar deaths could happen in the future if lessons were not learned from this incident.”
And his “shock” is overstated, since his clarification makes plain that he was not shocked at all: 
‘But to the shock of the county's coroner, Sean McGovern, it was revealed that the pensioner had earlier informed a senior church member of his murderous plan.’
And, as stated previously, I am even suspicious of the phrase ‘devout Jehovah’s Witness.’ How many reporters, in this secular age, use the word ‘devout?’ It smacks of a hit job—a Witness-bashing writer pulling out all the stops, be they valid or not, to connect a painful human tragedy, someone snapping under the stress of seeing a loved ones health dissipate and vanish, even a misguided ‘mercy killing,’ with a religious group he detests, to pursue his own vendetta.
And if this is the case, it is more than “an apostate lie” that ‘Patiently Sitting on My Hands’ champions. It is “a despicable apostate lie.”
 

It won’t go to trial because there is no complaint. It is just PSoMHs puffing up the griping of one of his friends.

I don’t hate you. I consider you a dodo. There’s a difference. 

Only ‘dodo.’ And only when it is appropriate. Which, admittedly, occurs frequently.

It won’t go to trial because there is no complaint. It is just PSoMHs puffing up the griping of one of his friends.

Furthermore, since the coroner has since made clear that no way did any other party (JW or otherwise) fail to pick up on signals, this next statement of the story must be completely made up:
”And Mr McGovern warned that similar deaths could happen in the future if lessons were not learned from this incident.”
And his “shock” is overstated, since his clarification makes plain that he was not shocked at all: 
‘But to the shock of the county's coroner, Sean McGovern, it was revealed that the pensioner had earlier informed a senior church member of his murderous plan.’
And, as stated previously, I am even suspicious of the phrase ‘devout Jehovah’s Witness.’ How many reporters, in this secular age, use the word ‘devout?’ It smacks of a hit job—a Witness-bashing writer pulling out all the stops, be they valid or not, to connect a painful human tragedy, someone snapping under the stress of seeing a loved ones health dissipate and vanish, even a misguided ‘mercy killing,’ with a religious group he detests, to pursue his own vendetta.
And if this is the case, it is more than “an apostate lie” that ‘Patiently Sitting on My Hands’ champions. It is “a despicable apostate lie.”
 

The phrase you are looking for is: ‘a lie.’
Headline of your story reads: “Coroner blasts Jehovah’s Witnesses for not stopping....”
Whereupon the coroner himself, who has other things to do but is annoyed at being misrepresented, must set the record straight:
“We would like to state that at no time did the Coroner find that opportunities existed and/or were missed by any individual or group to prevent the murder.”
One might even say the phrase you are looking for is: “an apostate lie.” Who else would turn the Coroner’s statement inside out?

I think this is a good way to put it. It accounts for “extremism” being extended into things that never used to be thought extremist at all—quirky, perhaps, but not “extremist”—like the “preaching of the good news” or any suggestion that one should be “no part of the world.”

I think this is a good way to put it. It accounts for “extremism” being extended into things that never used to be thought extremist at all—quirky, perhaps, but not “extremist”—like the “preaching of the good news” or any suggestion that one should be “no part of the world.”

Why do I have the irresistible urge to start a new account?
”Patiently sitting on my hands until God gets himself in gear and sends the true anointed.”

Oh, come now! It is not possible for anyone to be so obtuse! You are putting me on! 
Look, Witness, and KickedFace, and Matthew4 5784, and Shwiiiiiiiiii and Sreckohehehe ))))), and several others all want what you want—the destruction of the JW organization. They all are using the CSA issue to that end. But they are all smart enough not to provide proof positive of it. None of them are so stupid as to say:
“I am only interested in the CSA within the W/t, CCJW, JW Org, and their other orgs / titles.  The reason being that the GB et al keep spouting that 'God and Christ trust them' and that JWs have the ONLY true religion / way of serving God.”
Is it any wonder that, in my moments of weakness, I yield to that weakness and call you a dodo. This is my greatest persecution—right here. 

You consistently wear such a huge “Kick Me” sign on your behind that I find it hard to resist.
But I am trying. You remember this line from the other thread?
“Is it possible for you not to notice that you exactly validate what [Holly Folk] says?”
It was originally: “Is it possible that you are so stupid so as not to notice that you exactly validate what she says?”
I changed it (trust me on this) not because my assessment of your brightness had increased. I changed it so as to be instructed by several here who are better than I at “not paying back injury with injury.”
 

In all probability, the reporter saw a Watchtower in the trash, and that was enough for them to be “devout Jehovah’s Witnesses.”
Within the last few weeks, 4Jah (who for some inane reason, has changed his name—perhaps because “jah” now offends him) has posted a lawyer’s trolling for clients as though it was cutting edge reporting. And Witness heralded some rumor about Watchtower and the ARC and almost immediately had to take it back as it proved false.
No one has time to unravel them all, but this will prove to be something similar. Or it may be just as you said, an end case of dementia or a mate who could no longer see the other suffer. As to somehow it becoming the fault of elders, we routinely hear of atrocities committed today and it turns out that the persons had been reported previously to police. But they receive so many of these reports, from so many persons, that they can’t possibly keep up, and such reports fall through the cracks. There is at most a quick visit by a social worker to pronounce counsel was given & all is now okay, and then a mass shoot-em-up occurs. 
Charles Manson’s greatest contribution to society—some would say his only contribution, was to say: “It used to be that being crazy meant something. Nowadays, everyone is crazy.”

The phrase you are looking for is: ‘a lie.’
Headline of your story reads: “Coroner blasts Jehovah’s Witnesses for not stopping....”
Whereupon the coroner himself, who has other things to do but is annoyed at being misrepresented, must set the record straight:
“We would like to state that at no time did the Coroner find that opportunities existed and/or were missed by any individual or group to prevent the murder.”
One might even say the phrase you are looking for is: “an apostate lie.” Who else would turn the Coroner’s statement inside out?

Preparing to conduct a Bible study later. So much is packed into these videos to show death is not a launching pad into heaven or hell. I like this one about Lazarus raised after 4 days. Wouldn’t he have been annoyed to be hauled out of heaven? (or cool his tush in a bucket of water had he gone to the other place.)
https://www.jw.org/finder?srcid=jwlshare&wtlocale=E&lank=docid-502017858_1_VIDEO

@Anna@ThinkingThere is an update on this. Turns out there was no censure at all, and it took the coroner himself to set the record straight. 
”We would like to state that at no time did the Coroner find that opportunities existed and/or were missed by any individual or group to prevent the murder.”
https://redditchstandard.co.uk/news/clarification-of-coroners-findings/?fbclid=IwAR1YUsWpy38RFhiS4mBvYA8f_oHJ-z95XSLSMHMXv2YFunyMEKwS5ipX2yM
Once again, the story was posted here by a dodo who presents his wishful thinking as though it was fact.
 
 
 

Hopefully when the TA appears, he will say: “Sorry I took so long. Sorry about there being no guidance whatsoever for the sheep while I was waking up. Thanks for trying to keep certain yo-yos in check while I was delaying.

For similar reasons, I swore off badminton