A simple Question for Trinitarian apologists

[Guest Kurt]

The Dotcrine of Confusion!

Which of is God?

QUESTION: Why do Trinitarian apologists no longer appeal to their favorite proof-text, 1 John 5:7?  Is it because everyday people are now aware this verse is proven to be completely fraudulent?

ANSWER:  1 John 5:7 has been tampered with in Worldly Translations of the Bible, claiming it to be God's Word.  If you had someone trying to convince you to believe in something and you found out it was a lie, would you still bet your SOUL on that doctrine?

Therefore, 1 John 5:7 was CHANGED, remember the "truth" never changes.  The "truth" was Altered by Trinitarian apologists who stooped to LIE by deception knowing all well that changing this verse by adding a man-made doctrine was nullifying God's Word.
 

A simple Question for Trinitarian apologists

Maybe we should be calling Trintiarians False Prophets, for they speak as God's mouthpiece in spreading man-made doctrine?

 

 

[Guest Kurt]

Trinity Doctrine NAMELESS

Whose will shall we do?

QUESTION: If the doctrine of the Trinity is so fundamental to Christianity, as Trinitarians claim, why is there a complete failure on the part of Jesus and his apostles to articulate it anywhere?

ANSWER: Jesus nor any of his apostles articulated the belief in a trinity.  The Christian Trinity is actually an Apostate teaching which denounces Jesus as the Christ, for the fact of the omission.  Simply put, the teachings of the trinity is simply not the teachings of Christ. 

Matter of fact, the scriptures states, "Everyone that pushes ahead and does not remain in the teaching of the Christ does not have God." (2 John 1:9)

The man-made Trinity doctrine does just that, it does not remain in the teaching of the Christ.  Christ is not even named or mentioned in the entire doctrine. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are NAMELESS. The doctrine is generic in it's form and non specific. You would not be able to find a scripture that states the Father, the Son, and Holy Spirit are coequal.      

The teaching of Christ is that “the Father is greater than I” (John 14:28)   So we have Christ teaching that the Father is Greater than he is and the Trinity is teaching a different doctrine or gospel that the son is equal to the Father.  The Trinity doctrine actually rejects the teachings of Christ and this is the AntiChrist.

Jesus Christ taught that, “God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that everyone exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.” (John 3:16)

Yet the Trinity doctrine teaches another doctrine that God became flesh, it teaches the son of man is God.  No where in the Bible does it say God is a man or that the son of man is God.  The scriptures actually say the OPPOSITE of Trinitarian Beliefs.  So which is Inspired?  The Holy Trinity or the Holy Bible?

Numbers 23:19 says, "God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent:.”  The Trinity opposes this Inspired Scripture and some even go to blaspheme God's Word by stating that God’s Word has changed.  Well folks, “the truth” never changes.

The “Trinity” was a way to control people, and if they rejected the Holy Trinity, they were branded by the Pagan Roman Emperor.  Today, people are still being controlled and branded by accepting this doctrine.  

To insure that people would be forced into accepting the trinity, shortly after the 381 council, Emperor Theodosius’declared:

   …let us believe in the one diety of the father, Son and Holy Spirit, in equal majesty and in a holy Trinity. We authorize the followers of this law to assume the title Catholic Christians; but as for the others, since in out judgment they are foolish madmen, we decree that the shall be branded with the ignominious name of heretics, and shall not presume to give their conventicles the name of churches. They will suffer in the first place the chastisement of divine condemnation an the second the punishment of out authority, in accordance with the will of heaven shall decide to inflict...(Theodosian Code XVI.1.2. Cited in Bettenson H, ed., Documents of the Christian Church, London: Oxford University Press, 1943, p. 31).

Part of the problem of the trinitarian view of one God who manifests Himself in three modes is that it demands that God could not have different wills.  Yet Jesus taught, Father, if it is Your will, take this cup away from Me; nevertheless not My will, but Yours, be done (Luke 22:42).

Jesus is clearly stating that on this point He had a different will than the Father. If Jesus was part of the trinity, He could not have a different will than the Father.  Clearly then, the trinity doctrine is not a teaching of the Christ for if Jesus was God, he wouldn’t have the need to PRAY or ask for permission.

 

[Queen Esther]

I am glad, you changed the words from  "the Ghoust"  to the 'Holy Spirit' ... Thank you Kurt