Jump to content
The World News Media

Can JW Television (digital news) be trusted?


Srecko Sostar

Recommended Posts


  • Views 10.3k
  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

It's very difficult to make a presentation without showing bias. The things that are important to one person or group or religion are the thing reported, not the things that are much less important. T

(1 Corinthians 5:1) . . .Actually sexual immorality is reported among you, and such immorality as is not even found among the nations—of a man living with his father’s wife.  Well, I agree that t

This is the JW legal team attempting a very weak "negotiation" defense. It's easy to see that the data doesn't bear out the claim, however. With 221 of the 1,006 perpetrators, the data provided by "Je

Posted Images

  • Member

The Yellow Fogball Rules Of Debate:

1. Participants must recite their arguments in iambic pentameter to enhance the elegance of discourse.
2. Every point made must be accompanied by interpretive dance to emphasize its gravity.
3. Rebuttal arguments must be delivered while wearing an oversized prop hat for added credibility.
4. Participants must incorporate at least one random word from the Klingon language to showcase linguistic prowess.
5. Points can be countered with the power of interpretive mime, as long as it's conducted in complete silence.
6. If a debater quotes Shakespeare, opponents must reply in rhyming couplets for the remainder of the debate.
7. The use of airhorn sound effects is permitted only during particularly compelling arguments.
8. A gong will be struck to signal the end of a participant's turn, creating an air of ritualistic finality.
9. A designated "metaphor meter" will gauge the complexity of metaphors used, awarding extra points for obscurity.
10. During the final statements, participants must whisper their conclusions to convey an air of introspective wisdom.

And most important,

11. It’s not permitted to put rocks in the fogballs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
8 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

Does RNZ have information on the number of active pedophiles in other religious institutions and government centers, as well as globally? What about this place?

Who should care what happens in the rest of "Babylon the Great"?

Clean things up in your house, then take care of your neighbors.

Just suggestion :) 

 

By the way, RNZ focus is not on WTJWorg only, as you can inform yourself on their web.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

Because if you are in a forum discussing “all things about open water SCUBA diving”, the fact that one of the contributors is a farmer, and goes into a dissertation about hog management may safely be considered  extraneous fluff.

Unless the hogs SCUBA dive ….. and perhaps not even then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
2 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

why not publish all the RNZ claims made by other religions that they focus on?

What is holding you back from publishing the desired information? Is someone forbidding you? No commentators has anything against you posting news about Catholics, Mormons, Adventists, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
4 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

It seems that the commentator is narrow-minded, as they solely concentrate on one particular religion and overlook the significance of Babylon the Great, which they themselves are a part of. Instead of manipulating the comments to support the arguments of the commentators, why not publish all the RNZ claims made by other religions that they focus on? This clearly demonstrates the lack of sound judgment among former members and those who still support them despite being disfellowshipped.

I was never disfellowshipped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member

when someone makes a point, instead of just “downvoting” it, which is silly … and when you downvote straight facts is both sad and ludicrous … why not reply with comprehensive counterpoints?

If you do not like what someone is saying, refute it with what you think should have been said.

Acting like a grumpy undervoltage A.I. sure makes you think you are scholarly and profound, but to everyone else except your doppelgänger shills it looks stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.