Can JW Television (digital news) be trusted?

[Pudgy]

So… you start.

You know …. you CAN BUY a yellow highlighter to check your own fantasies before you publish them.

[Srecko Sostar]

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/495802/jehovah-s-witness-elder-alleges-order-to-destroy-evidence-in-child-sex-abuse-cases

Jehovah’s Witness elder alleges order to destroy evidence in child sex abuse cases

[Srecko Sostar]

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/in-depth/495727/rnz-investigation-reveals-11-alleged-paedophiles-active-within-the-jehovah-s-witnesses

RNZ investigation reveals 11 alleged paedophiles active within the Jehovah's Witnesses

[Matthew9969]

16 minutes ago, Pudgy said:

So… you start.

You know …. you CAN BUY a yellow highlighter to check your own fantasies before you publish them.

Maybe he thinks yellow highlighters are for mak8ng snow yellow?

[Pudgy]

The Yellow Fogball Rules Of Debate:

1. Participants must recite their arguments in iambic pentameter to enhance the elegance of discourse.
2. Every point made must be accompanied by interpretive dance to emphasize its gravity.
3. Rebuttal arguments must be delivered while wearing an oversized prop hat for added credibility.
4. Participants must incorporate at least one random word from the Klingon language to showcase linguistic prowess.
5. Points can be countered with the power of interpretive mime, as long as it's conducted in complete silence.
6. If a debater quotes Shakespeare, opponents must reply in rhyming couplets for the remainder of the debate.
7. The use of airhorn sound effects is permitted only during particularly compelling arguments.
8. A gong will be struck to signal the end of a participant's turn, creating an air of ritualistic finality.
9. A designated "metaphor meter" will gauge the complexity of metaphors used, awarding extra points for obscurity.
10. During the final statements, participants must whisper their conclusions to convey an air of introspective wisdom.

And most important,

11. It’s not permitted to put rocks in the fogballs.

 

[Pudgy]

Good diversion, expertly done.

Also irrelevant what “other folks” do or don’t do.

[Srecko Sostar]

8 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

Does RNZ have information on the number of active pedophiles in other religious institutions and government centers, as well as globally? What about this place?

Who should care what happens in the rest of "Babylon the Great"?

Clean things up in your house, then take care of your neighbors.

Just suggestion  

 

By the way, RNZ focus is not on WTJWorg only, as you can inform yourself on their web.

[Pudgy]

Because if you are in a forum discussing “all things about open water SCUBA diving”, the fact that one of the contributors is a farmer, and goes into a dissertation about hog management may safely be considered  extraneous fluff.

Unless the hogs SCUBA dive ….. and perhaps not even then.

[Srecko Sostar]

2 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

why not publish all the RNZ claims made by other religions that they focus on?

What is holding you back from publishing the desired information? Is someone forbidding you? No commentators has anything against you posting news about Catholics, Mormons, Adventists, etc.

[Matthew9969]

4 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

It seems that the commentator is narrow-minded, as they solely concentrate on one particular religion and overlook the significance of Babylon the Great, which they themselves are a part of. Instead of manipulating the comments to support the arguments of the commentators, why not publish all the RNZ claims made by other religions that they focus on? This clearly demonstrates the lack of sound judgment among former members and those who still support them despite being disfellowshipped.

I was never disfellowshipped.

[Pudgy]

when someone makes a point, instead of just “downvoting” it, which is silly … and when you downvote straight facts is both sad and ludicrous … why not reply with comprehensive counterpoints?

If you do not like what someone is saying, refute it with what you think should have been said.

Acting like a grumpy undervoltage A.I. sure makes you think you are scholarly and profound, but to everyone else except your doppelgänger shills it looks stupid.

[Pudgy]

whooo Dick Tracy, ya think?1