Victims of Pedophile Priests Speak Out - Awake 1993, April 8, page 31

[Pudgy]

Reality has always been worrisome for those agenda driven theorists whose income depends on a carefully crafted  web of fantasy definitions of reality.

 

[Pudgy]

EVERY time you use the term “former members …” you assume homogenous thinking of both groups, and is a prima facia admission of ignorance of reality.

What makes it worse it that it is deliberate and premeditated ignorance, actively denying reality.

That is what agenda driven thinking ALWAYS does.

The PROOF of it is clearly shown here, when you spasm downvote historically straight simple facts.

[Pudgy]

10 minutes ago, Fausto Hoover said:

Are there any bloggers here who have plenty of time on their hands but lack anything worthwhile to offer? Could it be that the subject hits too close to home for the disfellowshipped, causing them to deflect from the topic?

To directly answer both of your questions which are self-evident deflections, the answer is no, and no.

[Pudgy]

2 minutes ago, Fausto Hoover said:

No! No! Come on, let's divert attention from the deflector!

Physician, heal thyself ….

[Srecko Sostar]

19 hours ago, Fausto Hoover said:

The commentator should, without hesitation, denounce God, as the poster persists in condemning the commentator with unjust ignorance. Have you ever come across the phrase "we are not infallible" used by the leaders of the Watchtower? I suggest that the commentator should embrace the concept of revision, which is an essential practice for educational institutions and governments to adapt to the ever-evolving knowledge and times. By embracing these revisions, the commentator can truly experience the impact they have on our daily lives.

Sorry, but WTJWorg is not an educational institution. WTJWorg is not a scientific institution.
WTJWorg is a religiously colored corporation. Members are mostly naive in their honesty.

Science has a "right" to make mistakes because they do not claim to be "guided by the holy spirit". GB claims that they are the only ones in the whole world who are "HS driven" so such a claim disqualifies them from their own justification that they are prone to "inaccuracies" because they are not "perfect".

[Pudgy]

So, FH, why not give a point by point rebuttal instead of your valueless imaginary generalizations?

[Pudgy]

Could it be that is the best you can do?

 

[Srecko Sostar]

40 minutes ago, Errikos Tsiamis said:

the actual truth

The actual or present "truth" vs past and future "truth". Never ending story.  

[Pudgy]

2 hours ago, Srecko Sostar said:

The actual or present "truth" vs past and future "truth". Never ending story.  

… this is true about scientific discoveries, a good example is humanities concept of the Atom, and how it changed over time. Each period of time what was known was considered to be “the truth“ and it is understandable the massive errors that only surfaced through time and experience.

1. Ancient Greece (5th century BC):

   - The concept of the atom was first proposed by Greek philosopher Leucippus and his student Democritus. They believed that everything was composed of indivisible particles called "atomos," which means "indivisible" in Greek

2. Dalton's Atomic Theory (early 19th century):

   - In the early 19th century, English chemist John Dalton developed the modern atomic theory. He proposed that all matter is composed of indivisible atoms, each with a specific mass and chemical properties. This theory laid the foundation for the study of chemistry.

3. Discovery of Subatomic Particles (late 19th and early 20th centuries):

   - J.J. Thomson discovered the electron in 1897, demonstrating that atoms were not indivisible as previously thought. He proposed the "plum pudding" model, where electrons were embedded in a positively charged sphere.

   - Ernest Rutherford's gold foil experiment in 1909 led to the discovery of the atomic nucleus. He proposed the nuclear model of the atom, where electrons orbit a central nucleus.

   - Niels Bohr's model in 1913 introduced quantized energy levels for electrons in orbits, which explained the spectral lines of hydrogen

4. Development of Quantum Mechanics (early 20th century):

   - Quantum mechanics, developed by physicists like Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrödinger, revolutionized the understanding of atoms. It introduced the idea of electron wave functions and probabilistic behavior of particles at the atomic level.

5. The Standard Model (20th century):

   - The Standard Model of particle physics, developed in the mid-20th century, describes the fundamental particles and forces in the universe. It includes particles like quarks, leptons, and bosons and provides a comprehensive framework for understanding atomic and subatomic phenomena.

6. Modern Advances (late 20th century to present):

   - Advancements in technology, such as the development of particle accelerators, have allowed scientists to study atoms and subatomic particles with unprecedented precision.

   - The discovery of the Higgs boson in 2012 at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was a significant milestone in understanding the fundamental particles that make up atoms.

This history reflects humanity's continuous quest to unravel the mysteries of the atom, from the ancient Greeks' philosophical ideas to the development of sophisticated quantum theories and particle physics in the modern era. Our understanding of atoms continues to evolve as scientific research progresses.

…. and that’s OK …. because NONE of these men and women claimed their knowledge was based on, or dependent on a “Special Relationship” with the True God, who provided honest hearted people everywhere clear instructions of what it would take to become Jehovah’s Friend.

What if you got on an airplane flying from Miami to Los Angeles and the Pilots got it wrong six or eight times, and landed you in Montreal, then Santiago, then Houston, then Newark, then Honolulu, etc?

What confidence would you have … what confidence would ANY REASONABLE PERSON HAVE, that the pilots had any idea of how to navigate?

Even if they declared at each landing that they had “New Maps”, how much confidence would ANY non-agenda driven person have?

[Pudgy]

DUH !

[Pudgy]

Or what?

 

 

 

 

[Matthew9969]

On 9/5/2023 at 10:58 AM, Errikos Tsiamis said:

It seems that this disfellowshipped individual is intentionally trying to cause stumbling among faithful witnesses.

Thats not hard to do since jw's can be stumbled by a fortune cookie.