September 2023 brings a “global campaign” for the Jehovah’s Witnesses

[Pudgy]

I know what the term “baby” means.

I know what the term “enemy” means.

I know what the term “God” means.

I know that babies are NOT ENEMIES OF GOD.

…. a point you, Fausto Hoover, et al, cannot see because you have absolutely no common sense whatsoever.

You are defending an insane, stupid, and indefensible position.

You SPECIFICALLY agreed with Lett’s opinion, and now are trying to rationalize your way out of it.

 

…and no, these are NOT jawbones, even if the most celebrated media dentist in the world says they are. 

[Pudgy]

The only questions I have after reading the previous attempts at hypnotic tomes, is which one of you two is the puppetmaster, and which one of you two is the sock puppet?

 

[Pudgy]

1 hour ago, Errikos Tsiamis said:

Brother, it is a truly unfortunate situation that such negative influence has surfaced due to a simple mistake in word selection.

It was not a simple mistake.

This was NOT a live broadcast. 

It was a pre-recorded broadcast that was reviewed by many “helpers”, and the entire Governing Body before being approved for broadcast.

 

[Pudgy]

6 minutes ago, Pudgy said:

It was not a simple mistake.

This was NOT a live broadcast. 

It was a pre-recorded broadcast that was reviewed by many “helpers”, and the entire Governing Body before being approved for broadcast.

 

 

[Pudgy]

7 hours ago, Pudgy said:

I know what the term “baby” means.

I know what the term “enemy” means.

I know what the term “God” means.

I know that babies are NOT ENEMIES OF GOD.

…. a point you, Fausto Hoover, et al, cannot see because you have absolutely no common sense whatsoever.

You are defending an insane, stupid, and indefensible position.

You SPECIFICALLY agreed with Lett’s opinion, and now are trying to rationalize your way out of it.

 

…and no, these are NOT jawbones, even if the most celebrated media dentist in the world says they are. 

 

[Pudgy]

THAT … Fausto Hoover is YOUR direct quote, agreeing with the Lett video clip.

Weasel out of THAT!

I will post it again, “… just to rub it in “. 

[Pudgy]

By the way, Freddie,  if you intend to try to weasel way your way out of your own words by saying I took you out of context, I have a screenshot of your entire post.

[Pudgy]

My antics are meaningless?

HAHAAHAhahahaa.!!

[Pudgy]

.

 

 

[Srecko Sostar]

10 hours ago, Errikos Tsiamis said:

We, as believers, grasped the profound meaning behind Brother Lett's words when he stated at the outset that our imperfections make us all enemies of God. Indeed, it is a fact that we are still unable to elude imperfection.

Is this statement in any context? Be that as it may, it gives the message that GB members, who according to your own words and their own are imperfect, are ultimately enemies of God. So the enemies of God run WTJWorg?

 

Commentary through the question about materialized angels. Are their children, the Nephilim, evil because they were born of angelic fathers and earthly women? Or because they were not well raised by their parents?
If Jesus had children with an earthly woman, would his children be evil from birth, because he is of angelic origin as well (I say angelic because WTJWorg considers him to be the angel Michael)?

[Pudgy]

Perfect common sense rebuttal!

And the logic and reasoning is theologically sound, reasonable, and the logic is solid, Srecko Sostar.

[Srecko Sostar]

Did David and Bathsheba give birth to the enemy of God? Did their son die because he was an enemy or did God punish David and Bathsheba by killing their baby? Adulterers were spared life, and the price for keeping them alive was the death of a newborn child? That child must have been a real danger to David's Kingdom. A dangerous little enemy. Perhaps the fate of that child would have been better if it had been a female child.