Jump to content
The World News Media

New Light on Beards


JW Insider

Recommended Posts

  • Member
1 hour ago, Thinking said:

Miles and you are the biggest Judges here….if you have made your mind up to...

There's a difference between judging someone's personal choice and what they say. If you say something in a public forum then expect it to be challenged. If you're not looking for response then why are you sharing? I don't care what choices you make. Your life is yours. I do hope you have a good life though. I do care about people.

When I share it is to share. If someone challenges what I share it gives everyone watching an opportunity to learn and grow, and me in particular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 17.6k
  • Replies 402
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

A lot of speculation there. I think this is about unity. I always say there is strength in numbers. It's apparent that HQ received many "complaints" (they said so) from people who were argui

I think the current GB realizes it has a compilation of messes on its hands that can only accrue problematically. It's trying to dig itself out. But the fear is the pile is too deep. Ultimately the 19

My speculations aren't worth the time to read them, but I'm guessing a timeline like the following:  2024: No more Circuit Overseers. (The reason that the District Overseers were let go was not b

Posted Images

  • Member
58 minutes ago, Thinking said:
5 hours ago, Many Miles said:

I/2 is a fraction. Right? Is 1/2 the parts that constitute "soul" soul?

Oh, and cryosupernatant is, as a fraction, MORE than 1/2 the circulating blood in your veins this very moment. Is cryosupernatant "blood"?

Oh, and white cells are, as a fraction, about 1/100 of the circulating blood in your veins this very moment. Is white cells "blood"?

Crazy talk…all you do miles is try to confuse with false intellectual talk…your very good at it …..i think your a straight out stirrer…that lacks even common sense…. I shall be blocking you as I think you are a very sly man……you came on here with one purpose in mind…..so I’ll leave you too it,

Well I suppose you won't see this. But who knows? If crazy talk is putting falsifiable information out there then call me crazy. Otherwise you've just left questions unanswered. Which is fine too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
1 hour ago, JW Insider said:

I'm not even sure exactly where MIles is coming from on this topic.

MM is just responding to what's put in front of him. If there's a specific question, ask away.

Generally, and maybe this is what you're looking for,

I'd say if a person uses anything from the donor blood supply then they have failed to abstain from blood someone else donated.

To suggest we can eat [cryosupernatant] [water, minerals and fat comprising more than 50% of fruit from the tree of knowledge] and say we've abstained from eating of [donor blood] [fruit of the tree of knowledge] is pure folly.

A personal uncoerced choice to refuse anything or everything from blood for transfusion is of no concern to me whatsoever.

People writing things that are false or unsound concerns me if those things could present a danger to readers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
20 minutes ago, Many Miles said:

Oh, and cryosupernatant is, as a fraction, MORE than 1/2 the circulating blood in your veins this very moment. Is cryosupernatant "blood"?

Oh, and white cells are, as a fraction, about 1/100 of the circulating blood in your veins this very moment. Is white cells "blood"?

I'm assuming that these fractions refer to the fraction of the total volume. Is it the fraction after water has been removed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
19 minutes ago, JW Insider said:

I'm assuming that these fractions refer to the fraction of the total volume. Is it the fraction after water has been removed?

The percentages I cited are of what was donated, which was circulating blood. So, yes, the percentage includes whatever water is party to that blood product. And, by the way, a red cell is mostly water too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member
25 minutes ago, George88 said:

I was going to laugh until you added Eddie Murphy. Now, who is the comedian? Ha! Ha!

It is hard to go wrong with an Eddie Murphy movie. Unless it is too foul to watch.

I feel a duty to screen movies for Many Miles who hasn’t seen that many.  The Amazon Eddie Murphy movie ‘Candy Cane Lane’ is okay and pretty funny, assuming you don’t spaz out over Christmas.

There is about a 20 year period of my life where I saw almost no TV, my ‘righteous years.’ There are shows that everyone speaks about of which I’ve never seen an episode, though a few I’ve caught up with afterwards, such as Psych.

Public television was unlimited and free for my kids, but for commercial TV they had to redeem ‘TV tickets’ we issued them weekly, and it didn’t allow for much. To be sure, I believe they found a way to counterfeit them, but the practice still served to shield them from much rubbish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Service Confirmation Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.