Watchtower's 1914 Chronology - Ad Nauseum

[JW Insider]

23 minutes ago, BTK59 said:

What's another correction to add to the extensive list of errors spanning over a decade? It's ironic how even a six-year-old can possess greater knowledge than the people here, don't you think?

Sorry @Thinking. I was taking a guess that he was closer to age 65 than to 120. But I have now been corrected. I think he's now claiming that he is closer to 6. 

If you have followed his past claims under some of those other names, you'd know that he has a bigger and more expensive sniper rifle than @Pudgy could ever dream about, plus 2 PhD's in Theology. Quite the combination. That's quite a feat for a 6-year-old! 

I'm super impressed.

[BTK59]

It is not unusual for adults who behave like children, particularly in a spiritual sense, to lack knowledge in many areas. It is important to rely on professionals and those who genuinely appreciate God's laws. Christianity is not meant for conformists who are attached to other unrepentant sinners and then claim to be Christian.

Tom, what has become of the Israelites and Jews? If your commentary implies that I should allow my brothers to be destroyed on judgment day due to their current foolishness, then so be it. However, that wish of yours should not be forced upon others.

[Thinking]

On 6/24/2024 at 1:43 AM, TrueTomHarley said:

He did say it. He also made it clear that the DFing was on this own insistence, that his elders didn’t want to, and they acquiesced only after he badgered them repeatedly. Seems he had a little legal matter coming up and he didn’t want it to reflect badly upon God’s name should it not turn out well. Odd, really, to fall on his own sword in that way, when no one asked it of him.

It is due to these circumstances that I and some others have had as much to do with him as we have. Alas, I can picture BTK walking out of the KH in discuss after that recent update advocating civil treatment of disfellowshipped ones.

 

 

 

On 6/24/2024 at 1:43 AM, TrueTomHarley said:

He did say it. He also made it clear that the DFing was on this own insistence, that his elders didn’t want to, and they acquiesced only after he badgered them repeatedly. Seems he had a little legal matter coming up and he didn’t want it to reflect badly upon God’s name should it not turn out well. Odd, really, to fall on his own sword in that way, when no one asked it of him.

It is due to these circumstances that I and some others have had as much to do with him as we have. Alas, I can picture BTK walking out of the KH in discuss after that recent update advocating civil treatment of disfellowshipped ones.

 

it has always been my understanding that the elders would not disfellowship him even tho he asked to be. No matter  of the confusion …I would still talk with him as I have done previously and I wish the man well…

He fell on his sword for the sake of others and peace..

[Thinking]

On 6/25/2024 at 6:27 AM, JW Insider said:

BTK can correct me if I'm wrong, but a person who remembers Russell's time in a meaningful way would have to have been born at least around 1904 just to be 12 years old when Russell died. That would make him 120 years old this year. My conversations with @BTK59, @George88, @AllenSmith35, etc., have led me to believe that he is closer to 65 years old. This might not be true, but it's based on a couple of things he has said. 

That said, he does without a doubt have knowledge about Russell and early Bible Students.

Yes yes I know..I did the maths too…I was trying to be nice…..one is dealing with “ One flew over the Cookoo’s nest”…..here…

[Thinking]

On 6/24/2024 at 9:37 AM, Miracle Pete said:

You really do have a monstrous ego.

 

What a joy you must be to those in your congregation. Although I still do not believe you are a real witness. 

No nor do I…..but he keeps the forum active I suppose.

[Thinking]

On 6/24/2024 at 9:37 AM, Miracle Pete said:

You really do have a monstrous ego.

 

What a joy you must be to those in your congregation. Although I still do not believe you are a real witness. 

That spirit had nothing holy about it…more like a dark entity..

[BTK59]

Your behavior seems to be in line with the very behavior you criticize. It is hypocritical to speak out against others while failing to recognize your own abusive conduct and resorting to personal insults. Your actions contradict your outspokenness. Perhaps it is time to reflect on the inconsistency of your behavior, "thinking."

You still claim to be a witness, even as you persist in defending yourself with your own deceitful words against scripture. It's ironic and amusing.

[BTK59]

Consider this, Tom. The individual who was disfellowshipped claimed that he pressured the Elders to address his atrocious crime, which he is still being pursued for under secular law. This is a case of CSA at its worst, and you are suggesting that James/Pudgy had to pressure the Elders to take action? If those Elders were racist like he is, any other group of Elders would have acted appropriately and purged him from that congregation without hesitation upon learning of the charges. That is not a baseless and dismissive allegation as you people here are trying to downplay it. However, "thinking" is defending a person who is accused of CSA as a Jehovah's Witness. We could argue the same thing for apostate Srecko, who defended James, but at least he had a motive as an apostate. So, she thinks I'm crazy? I'm not the one who fled from the mental institution with that mindset, lol!

If he was found "not guilty" of the state charge despite strong evidence with electronic surveillance, it is important to emphasize that his age and medical condition should not cause the jury to overlook that evidence in a trial for that charge. It is highly doubtful that he will be acquitted of the 2 remaining charges out of the initial 8. It is very likely that he has already been placed under house arrest or on probation due to his condition. If he has been placed under house arrest, he will not be allowed to have any visitors other than family, including members of his congregation. Additionally, he will not have access to electronic devices with internet connection, as this would contradict the purpose of the felony charges against him.

So, unless he has wealth like "Weinstein," he won't be getting out of that one. I am truly perplexed as to why JWI, who purportedly has an attorney in his family, has not clarified that concept to that person "thinking."